• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用扩散张量成像和扩散加权成像鉴别头颈部良恶性病变

Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Head and Neck Lesions With Diffusion Tensor Imaging and DWI.

作者信息

Koontz Nicholas A, Wiggins Richard H

机构信息

1 Department of Radiology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT.

2 Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, 550 N University Blvd, Rm 0663, Indianapolis, IN 46202.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 May;208(5):1110-1115. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16486. Epub 2017 Feb 28.

DOI:10.2214/AJR.16.16486
PMID:28245145
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can be used to differentiate between benign and malignant head and neck lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with head and neck lesions who underwent clinical MRI at 1.5 or 3 T with DWI or DTI parameters. ROI analysis was performed, with lesion-to-medulla apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) ratios generated.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients with head and neck lesions were included (71 benign, 40 malignant). Twenty-one patients had multiple lesions. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) were seen in the mean ADC values ± SD of malignant and benign lesions (0.55 × 10 ± 0.14 × 10 mm/s vs 0.89 × 10 ± 0.29 × 10 mm/s, respectively) and in the mean ADC ratios of malignant and benign lesions (0.88 ± 0.21 vs 1.40 ± 0.44, respectively) with DTI parameters. DTI and DWI parameters produced similar mean ADC ratio values for malignant (0.88 ± 0.21 and 0.92 ± 0.54, respectively) and benign lesions (1.40 ± 0.44 and 1.79 ± 0.52, respectively). ADC ratio thresholds for predicting malignancy for DTI (ADC ratio ≤ 1) and DWI (ADC ratio ≤ 0.94) were also similar.

CONCLUSION

DTI is a useful predictor of malignancy for head and neck lesions, with ADC values of malignant lesions significantly lower than those of benign lesions. DTI ADC values were lower than DWI ADC values for all head and neck lesions in our study group, often below reported malignant DWI threshold values. Normalization of ADC values to an internal control resulted in similar ADC ratios on DWI and DTI.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定扩散张量成像(DTI)是否可用于鉴别头颈部良性和恶性病变。

材料与方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了接受1.5或3T临床MRI检查且具有扩散加权成像(DWI)或DTI参数的头颈部病变患者。进行了感兴趣区(ROI)分析,生成病变与延髓的表观扩散系数(ADC)比值。

结果

纳入65名头颈部病变患者(71个良性病变,40个恶性病变)。21名患者有多个病变。恶性和良性病变的平均ADC值±标准差(分别为0.55×10±0.14×10 mm²/s和0.89×10±0.29×10 mm²/s)以及恶性和良性病变的平均ADC比值(分别为0.88±0.21和1.40±0.44)在DTI参数方面存在统计学显著差异(p < 0.001)。DTI和DWI参数对恶性病变(分别为0.88±

相似文献

1
Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Head and Neck Lesions With Diffusion Tensor Imaging and DWI.利用扩散张量成像和扩散加权成像鉴别头颈部良恶性病变
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 May;208(5):1110-1115. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16486. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
2
Comparison of the diagnostic performances of diffusion parameters in diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging of breast lesions.扩散加权成像和扩散张量成像中扩散参数对乳腺病变诊断性能的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Dec;82(12):e801-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
3
Differentiation of benign and malignant lesions of the tongue by using diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 T.使用3.0 T磁共振扩散加权成像鉴别舌部良恶性病变
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(7):20140325. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20140325. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
4
Feasibility study of reduced field of view diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck tumors.头颈肿瘤中缩小视野扩散加权磁共振成像的可行性研究
Acta Radiol. 2017 Mar;58(3):292-300. doi: 10.1177/0284185116652014. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
5
Utility of diffusion tensor imaging in differentiating benign from malignant hepatic focal lesions.扩散张量成像在鉴别肝脏局灶性病变良恶性中的应用
Eur Radiol. 2023 Feb;33(2):1400-1411. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09091-w. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
6
Optimal b value in diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiation of abdominal lesions.扩散加权成像中用于腹部病变鉴别的最佳b值
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Sep;40(3):559-66. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24403. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
7
Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: comparison with conventional DWI.体素内不相干运动(IVIM)在评估乳腺病变中的应用:与常规 DWI 的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Dec;82(12):e782-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.08.006. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
8
Diffusion tensor imaging for characterizing tumor microstructure and improving diagnostic performance on breast MRI: a prospective observational study.弥散张量成像用于表征肿瘤微结构并提高乳腺 MRI 的诊断性能:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Breast Cancer Res. 2019 Sep 4;21(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13058-019-1183-3.
9
Comparison of accuracy of intravoxel incoherent motion and apparent diffusion coefficient techniques for predicting malignancy of head and neck tumors using half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging.使用半傅里叶单次激发快速自旋回波扩散加权成像比较体素内不相干运动和表观扩散系数技术预测头颈部肿瘤恶性程度的准确性
Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Sep;32(7):860-6. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 May 12.
10
Diffusion-weighted imaging in the head and neck region: usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient values for characterization of lesions.头颈部区域的扩散加权成像:表观扩散系数值在病变特征描述中的应用价值
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2015 May-Jun;21(3):208-14. doi: 10.5152/dir.2014.14279.

引用本文的文献

1
Using non-Gaussian diffusion models to distinguish benign from malignant head and neck lesions.使用非高斯扩散模型鉴别头颈部良性与恶性病变。
Front Oncol. 2025 May 29;15:1581637. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1581637. eCollection 2025.
2
The evolving role of MRI in dentomaxillofacial diagnostics: a comprehensive review.MRI在牙颌面诊断中不断演变的作用:全面综述。
Eur Oral Res. 2025 Jan 5;59(1):58-67. doi: 10.26650/eor.2024145664.
3
Lesion Volume Divided by ADC Measures Is an Independent Prognostic Marker in Colorectal Liver Metastasis Treated by Y90-radioembolization.
Y90 放射性栓塞治疗的结直肠癌肝转移中,病变体积除以表观扩散系数测量值是一个独立的预后标志物。
In Vivo. 2025 Jan-Feb;39(1):292-301. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13827.
4
Utility of diffusion tensor imaging in differentiating benign from malignant thyroid nodules.弥散张量成像在鉴别甲状腺良恶性结节中的应用。
Neuroradiol J. 2024 Dec;37(6):751-757. doi: 10.1177/19714009241260807. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
5
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient as treatment response markers of skull base osteomyelitis: a preliminary study.动态对比增强磁共振成像参数及表观扩散系数作为颅底骨髓炎治疗反应标志物的初步研究
Pol J Radiol. 2023 Jul 5;88:e319-e324. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2023.130383. eCollection 2023.
6
Comparison of image quality and quantitative parameters in intravoxel incoherent motion imaging at 3-T based on turbo spin-echo and echo-planar imaging in patients with oral cancer.基于 turbo 自旋回波和回波平面成像的 3-T 体素内不相干运动成像在口腔癌患者中的图像质量和定量参数比较。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2023 Nov 7;29(6):786-793. doi: 10.4274/dir.2023.221849. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
7
Usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient values for distinguishing between squamous cell carcinoma and malignant salivary gland tumor of the head and neck.表观扩散系数值在鉴别头颈部鳞状细胞癌和恶性涎腺肿瘤中的作用。
Neuroradiol J. 2023 Oct;36(5):548-554. doi: 10.1177/19714009231163561. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
8
Added value of histogram analysis of ADC in predicting radiation-induced temporal lobe injury of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy.鼻咽癌调强放疗患者中,表观扩散系数直方图分析在预测放射性颞叶损伤方面的附加价值。
Insights Imaging. 2022 Dec 17;13(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01338-w.
9
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Parameters and Normalized ADC Values Could Aid Differentiation of Skull Base Osteomyelitis from Nasopharyngeal Cancer.动态对比增强 MRI 参数和标准化 ADC 值有助于鉴别颅底骨髓炎和鼻咽癌。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2023 Jan;44(1):74-78. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7740. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
10
Interstitial Brachytherapy of the Liver for Renal Cell Carcinoma: ADC Measurements Do Not Predict Overall Survival.肝脏间质近距离放疗治疗肾细胞癌:ADC 值测量不能预测总体生存率。
In Vivo. 2022 Nov-Dec;36(6):2945-2951. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13037.