Suppr超能文献

通过两种传统方法和超临界CO₂萃取获得的六种药用植物提取物的筛选,目标是香豆素含量、2,2-二苯基-1-苦基肼自由基清除能力和总酚含量。

Screening of Six Medicinal Plant Extracts Obtained by Two Conventional Methods and Supercritical CO₂ Extraction Targeted on Coumarin Content, 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl Radical Scavenging Capacity and Total Phenols Content.

作者信息

Molnar Maja, Jerković Igor, Suknović Dragica, Bilić Rajs Blanka, Aladić Krunoslav, Šubarić Drago, Jokić Stela

机构信息

Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Food Technology Osijek, Franje Kuhača 20, 31000 Osijek, Croatia.

Faculty of Chemistry and Technology, University of Split, R. Boškovića 35, 21000 Split, Croatia.

出版信息

Molecules. 2017 Feb 24;22(3):348. doi: 10.3390/molecules22030348.

Abstract

Six medicinal plants (Roth) G. Don, L., L., L., L., and L. were used. The aim of the study was to compare their extracts obtained by Soxhlet (hexane) extraction, maceration with ethanol (EtOH), and supercritical CO₂ extraction (SC-CO₂) targeted on coumarin content (by high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection, HPLC-UV), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH) scavenging capacity, and total phenols (TPs) content (by Folin-Ciocalteu assay). The highest extraction yields were obtained by EtOH, followed by hexane and SC-CO₂. The highest coumarin content (316.37 mg/100 g) was found in EtOH extracts, but its SC-CO₂ extraction yield was very low for further investigation. Coumarin was also found in SC-CO₂ extracts of , , , and . EtOH extracts of all plants exhibited the highest DPPH scavenging capacity. SC-CO₂ extracts exhibited antiradical capacity similar to hexane extracts, while SC-CO₂ extracts were the most potent (95.7%). EtOH extracts contained the most TPs (up to 132.1 mg gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/g from ) in comparison to hexane or SC-CO₂ extracts. TPs content was highly correlated to the DPPH scavenging capacity of the extracts. The results indicate that for comprehensive screening of different medicinal plants, various extraction techniques should be used in order to get a better insight into their components content or antiradical capacity.

摘要

使用了六种药用植物(罗氏)G.唐、L.、L.、L.、L.和L.。本研究的目的是比较通过索氏提取法(己烷)、乙醇浸渍法(EtOH)和超临界CO₂萃取法(SC-CO₂)获得的提取物,目标是测定香豆素含量(通过高效液相色谱-紫外检测法,HPLC-UV)、2,2-二苯基-1-苦基肼自由基(DPPH)清除能力和总酚(TPs)含量(通过福林-西奥尔特法)。乙醇提取法获得的提取率最高,其次是己烷和SC-CO₂。乙醇提取物中香豆素含量最高(316.37毫克/100克),但其SC-CO₂提取率很低,无法进一步研究。在、、和的SC-CO₂提取物中也发现了香豆素。所有植物的乙醇提取物表现出最高的DPPH清除能力。SC-CO₂提取物表现出与己烷提取物相似的抗自由基能力,而SC-CO₂提取物的效果最强(95.7%)。与己烷或SC-CO₂提取物相比,乙醇提取物含有最多的TPs(来自的高达132.1毫克没食子酸当量(GAE)/克)。TPs含量与提取物的DPPH清除能力高度相关。结果表明,为了全面筛选不同的药用植物,应使用各种提取技术,以便更好地了解其成分含量或抗自由基能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95ce/6155378/89164d4c2f80/molecules-22-00348-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验