Skolarus Lesli E, Mazor Kathleen M, Sánchez Brisa N, Dome Mackenzie, Biller José, Morgenstern Lewis B
From the Stroke Program (L.E.S., M.D., L.B.M.) and Department of Biostatistics (B.N.S), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Meyers Primary Care Institute, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (K.M.M.); and Department of Neurology, Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL (J.B.).
Stroke. 2017 Apr;48(4):1020-1025. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015107. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
Stroke preparedness interventions are limited by the lack of psychometrically sound intermediate end points. We sought to develop and assess the reliability and validity of the video-Stroke Action Test (video-STAT) an English and a Spanish video-based test to assess people's ability to recognize and react to stroke signs.
Video-STAT development and testing was divided into 4 phases: (1) video development and community-generated response options, (2) pilot testing in community health centers, (3) administration in a national sample, bilingual sample, and neurologist sample, and (4) administration before and after a stroke preparedness intervention.
The final version of the video-STAT included 8 videos: 4 acute stroke/emergency, 2 prior stroke/nonemergency, 1 nonstroke/emergency, and 1 nonstroke/nonemergency. Acute stroke recognition and action response were queried after each vignette. Video-STAT scoring was based on the acute stroke vignettes only (score range 0-12 best). The national sample consisted of 598 participants, 438 who took the video-STAT in English and 160 who took the video-STAT in Spanish. There was adequate internal consistency (Cronbach α=0.72). The average video-STAT score was 5.6 (SD=3.6), whereas the average neurologist score was 11.4 (SD=1.3). There was no difference in video-STAT scores between the 116 bilingual video-STAT participants who took the video-STAT in English or Spanish. Compared with baseline scores, the video-STAT scores increased after a stroke preparedness intervention (6.2 versus 8.9, <0.01) among a sample of 101 black adults and youth.
The video-STAT yields reliable scores that seem to be valid measures of stroke preparedness.
由于缺乏心理测量学上可靠的中间终点,中风准备干预措施受到限制。我们试图开发并评估视频中风行动测试(video-STAT)的信度和效度,这是一种基于英语和西班牙语视频的测试,用于评估人们识别中风症状并做出反应的能力。
Video-STAT的开发和测试分为4个阶段:(1)视频开发和社区生成的反应选项;(2)在社区卫生中心进行预测试;(3)在全国样本、双语样本和神经科医生样本中进行测试;(4)在中风准备干预前后进行测试。
Video-STAT的最终版本包括8个视频:4个急性中风/紧急情况、2个既往中风/非紧急情况、1个非中风/紧急情况和1个非中风/非紧急情况。每个 vignette 后询问急性中风的识别和行动反应。Video-STAT评分仅基于急性中风 vignette(得分范围0-12分最佳)。全国样本包括598名参与者,其中438人用英语进行video-STAT测试。160人用西班牙语进行video-STAT测试。内部一致性良好(Cronbach α=0.72)。Video-STAT的平均得分为5.6(标准差=3.6),而神经科医生的平均得分为11.4(标准差=1.3)。在116名用英语或西班牙语进行video-STAT测试的双语参与者中,Video-STAT得分没有差异。在101名黑人成年人和青年样本中,与基线得分相比,中风准备干预后Video-STAT得分有所提高(6.2对8.9,<0.01)。
Video-STAT产生可靠的分数,似乎是中风准备的有效测量方法。