• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

远水难救近火:感知距离对慈善行为预期效果和可能性的影响。

Too far to help: The effect of perceived distance on the expected impact and likelihood of charitable action.

机构信息

Marketing Department, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University.

Behavioral Science Department, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Jun;112(6):860-876. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000089. Epub 2017 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1037/pspi0000089
PMID:28253000
Abstract

Fact: Holding force constant, a snowball thrown from 10 feet away will hurt more than one thrown from 50 feet away; it will have more impact. We show that people expect charitable donations-much like snowballs-to have more impact on nearby (vs. faraway) targets. Therefore, because making an impact is a powerful motivator of prosocial behavior, people are more willing to take action to help nearby (vs. faraway) causes-independent of social distance. Six studies, including lab and field experiments, and secondary data from fundraising campaigns support this prediction. Specifically, Study 1 shows that people expect charitable donations to have a greater impact on nearby (vs. faraway) recipients, and that these judgments stem from metaphorical thinking. In the context of alumni giving to their alma mater, the next two studies show that donations increase as real (Study 2) or perceived (Study 3) distances decrease. Study 4 extends these findings using a more conservative manipulation of distance perception (Study 4). Finally, Study 5 demonstrates the mediating role of expected impact on the effect of perceived distance on charitable action, whereas Study 6 shows that a motivational focus on making an impact moderates this effect. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

事实

在保持力不变的情况下,从 10 英尺远的地方扔出的雪球比从 50 英尺远的地方扔出的雪球更疼;它会有更大的冲击力。我们表明,人们期望慈善捐款——很像雪球——对附近(而不是遥远的)目标有更大的影响。因此,因为产生影响是促进亲社会行为的有力动机,人们更愿意采取行动帮助附近(而不是遥远的)的事业——而不受社会距离的影响。六项研究,包括实验室和现场实验,以及筹款活动的二次数据,支持了这一预测。具体来说,研究 1 表明,人们期望慈善捐款对附近(而不是遥远的)受赠者有更大的影响,而这些判断源于隐喻思维。在校友向母校捐款的背景下,接下来的两项研究表明,随着实际(研究 2)或感知(研究 3)距离的缩短,捐款会增加。研究 4 使用更保守的距离感知操纵进一步扩展了这些发现(研究 4)。最后,研究 5 证明了预期影响在感知距离对慈善行为的影响中的中介作用,而研究 6 表明,关注产生影响的动机调节了这种影响。

相似文献

1
Too far to help: The effect of perceived distance on the expected impact and likelihood of charitable action.远水难救近火:感知距离对慈善行为预期效果和可能性的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Jun;112(6):860-876. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000089. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
2
The Interactive Effect of Incentive Salience and Prosocial Motivation on Prosocial Behavior.激励显著性与亲社会动机对亲社会行为的交互影响。
Psychol Sci. 2024 Apr;35(4):390-404. doi: 10.1177/09567976241234560. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
3
Charity preferences and perceived impact moderate charitable giving and associated neural response.慈善偏好和感知影响会调节慈善捐赠行为及其相关的神经反应。
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Sep 17;160:107957. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107957. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
4
Maimonides' ladder: States of mutual knowledge and the perception of charitability.迈蒙尼德阶梯:相互知识的状态和慈善感知。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Jan;148(1):158-173. doi: 10.1037/xge0000507. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
5
Unobserved altruism: How self-signaling motivations and social benefits shape willingness to donate.未被观察到的利他主义:自我信号动机和社会利益如何塑造捐赠意愿。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2020 Sep;26(3):538-550. doi: 10.1037/xap0000261. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
6
The effects of wearing a costume on charitable donations.穿着戏服对慈善捐赠的影响。
Psychol Rep. 2011 Feb;108(1):167-8. doi: 10.2466/01.07.PR0.108.1.167-168.
7
The self-protective altruist: terror management and the ambivalent nature of prosocial behavior.自我保护的利他主义者:恐惧管理与亲社会行为的矛盾本质。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 May;34(5):666-78. doi: 10.1177/0146167207313933. Epub 2008 Feb 26.
8
Examining charitable giving in real-world online donations.考察现实世界中在线捐赠的慈善行为。
Nat Commun. 2019 Sep 3;10(1):3968. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11852-z.
9
Multivariate pattern analysis of electroencephalography data reveals information predictive of charitable giving.多变量模式分析脑电图数据揭示了预测慈善捐赠的信息。
Neuroimage. 2021 Nov 15;242:118475. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118475. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
10
The Influence of Proportion Dominance and Global Need Perception on Donations.比例优势和全球需求认知对捐赠的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 2;13:800867. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.800867. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Earmarking donations to boost study participation? Evidence from a field experiment.指定捐赠以提高研究参与度?来自一项实地实验的证据。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 8;20(9):e0331498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331498. eCollection 2025.
2
Older adults across the globe exhibit increased prosocial behavior but also greater in-group preferences.全球老年人表现出更多的亲社会行为,但也有更强的内群体偏好。
Nat Aging. 2021 Oct;1(10):880-888. doi: 10.1038/s43587-021-00118-3. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
3
Exploring the relationship between exposure to COVID-19 and donations during the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediating roles of emotions and risk perception.
探索新冠疫情期间接触新冠病毒与捐赠行为之间的关系:情绪和风险认知的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 4;14:1052531. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1052531. eCollection 2023.
4
Improving behavioural compliance with the COVID-19 precautionary measures by means of innovative communication strategies: Social experimental studies.通过创新沟通策略提高对 COVID-19 预防措施的行为遵从性:社会实验研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 28;17(7):e0272001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272001. eCollection 2022.
5
Using virtual reality to increase charitable donations.利用虚拟现实增加慈善捐赠。
Mark Lett. 2022;33(1):75-87. doi: 10.1007/s11002-021-09601-8. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
6
God Helps Those Who Help Themselves: How Recipients' Efforts Perception Affects Donation.自助者天助:受助者的努力认知如何影响捐赠。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 6;12:695332. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.695332. eCollection 2021.
7
Helping when the desire is low: Expectancy as a booster.当意愿低落时给予帮助:期望作为一种助推力。
Motiv Emot. 2020;44(6):819-831. doi: 10.1007/s11031-020-09853-3. Epub 2020 Sep 4.