Suppr超能文献

指定捐赠以提高研究参与度?来自一项实地实验的证据。

Earmarking donations to boost study participation? Evidence from a field experiment.

作者信息

Raff Andreas, Böhm Robert, Fuchs Christoph

机构信息

Faculty of Business, Economics, and Statistics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Sep 8;20(9):e0331498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331498. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

Charitable donations are often the most suitable available way to incentivize study participation, yet their optimal design remains unclear. In a preregistered field experiment, we invited 6,711 psychology faculty at top-200 universities to complete a survey in exchange for a US $5 donation to test whether allowing prospective participants to earmark the donation for a specific purpose increases study participation. Contrary to preregistered hypotheses derived from previous literature, the results showed no significant increase in study participation rates when participants could earmark their donation compared to a random allocation of funds. These findings suggest that while earmarking has been shown to enhance overall donation rates, its effectiveness may not extend to incentivizing study participation.

摘要

慈善捐赠往往是激励参与研究的最合适方式,但它们的最佳设计仍不明确。在一项预先注册的实地实验中,我们邀请了排名前200的大学中的6711名心理学教员完成一项调查,以换取5美元的捐赠,来测试允许潜在参与者指定捐赠用途是否会增加研究参与度。与先前文献得出的预先注册假设相反,结果表明,与随机分配资金相比,当参与者可以指定捐赠用途时,研究参与率没有显著提高。这些发现表明,虽然指定用途已被证明能提高总体捐赠率,但其有效性可能无法延伸至激励研究参与。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c4/12416732/a69c23cb483f/pone.0331498.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验