MacDonald Kerry, Bahr Roald, Baltich Jennifer, Whittaker Jackie L, Meeuwisse Willem H
Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway; Aspetar Injury & Illness Prevention Program, Aspetar, Qatar; Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
Phys Ther Sport. 2017 May;25:15-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.12.001. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
To validate the use of an inertial measurement unit (IMU) for the collection of total jump count and assess the validity of an IMU for the measurement of jump height against 3-D motion analysis.
Cross sectional validation study.
3D motion-capture laboratory and field based settings.
Thirteen elite adolescent volleyball players.
Participants performed structured drills, played a 4 set volleyball match and performed twelve counter movement jumps.
Jump counts from structured drills and match play were validated against visual count from recorded video. Jump height during the counter movement jumps was validated against concurrent 3-D motion-capture data.
The IMU device captured more total jumps (1032) than visual inspection (977) during match play. During structured practice, device jump count sensitivity was strong (96.8%) while specificity was perfect (100%). The IMU underestimated jump height compared to 3D motion-capture with mean differences for maximal and submaximal jumps of 2.5 cm (95%CI: 1.3 to 3.8) and 4.1 cm (3.1-5.1), respectively.
The IMU offers a valid measuring tool for jump count. Although the IMU underestimates maximal and submaximal jump height, our findings demonstrate its practical utility for field-based measurement of jump load.
验证惯性测量单元(IMU)用于收集总跳跃次数的有效性,并评估IMU相对于三维运动分析测量跳跃高度的有效性。
横断面验证研究。
三维运动捕捉实验室和基于现场的设置。
13名精英青少年排球运动员。
参与者进行结构化训练、进行一场4局的排球比赛并进行12次反向移动跳跃。
将结构化训练和比赛中的跳跃次数与录制视频中的视觉计数进行验证。将反向移动跳跃期间的跳跃高度与同步的三维运动捕捉数据进行验证。
在比赛中,IMU设备记录的总跳跃次数(1032次)比视觉检查(977次)多。在结构化练习中,设备跳跃次数的敏感性很强(96.8%),而特异性为完美(100%)。与三维运动捕捉相比,IMU低估了跳跃高度,最大跳跃和次最大跳跃的平均差异分别为2.5厘米(95%CI:1.3至3.8)和4.1厘米(3.1 - 5.1)。
IMU为跳跃次数提供了一种有效的测量工具。尽管IMU低估了最大和次最大跳跃高度,但我们的研究结果证明了其在基于现场的跳跃负荷测量中的实际应用价值。