Suppr超能文献

超声弹性成像对乳腺乳头状病变的诊断有何帮助?

What Help Could Ultrasound Elastography Give to the Diagnosis of Breast Papillary Lesions?

作者信息

Li Lu-Jing, Yao Ji-Yi, Zhou Xin-Chuan, Zhao Xin-Bao, Zhong Wen-Jing, Ou Bing, Luo Bao-Ming, Hao Shao-Yun, Zhi Hui

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.

Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.

出版信息

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017 May;43(5):903-910. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Feb 27.

Abstract

On the basis of results of our previous studies and the findings of other scholars, the most common histologic type of false-positive diagnosis with strain elastography (SE) was papilloma. The objectives of our study were to evaluate whether SE could contribute to conventional ultrasound differentiation between benign and malignant papillary lesions and between papillary lesions and other common benign breast lesions. Data on 89 papillary lesions at our hospital, including 74 benign and 15 malignant papillary lesions, were included in our study. In addition, 198 non-papillary benign tumors were selected as the control group, including 126 fibroadenomas and 72 cases of fibrocystic mastopathy. All patients gave written informed consent. All patients with breast lesions underwent conventional ultrasound and SE examination. Breast Imaging Recording and Data System (BI-RADS) category and SE score were compared with respect to sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in differentiating between benign and malignant papillary lesions. We then explored the possibility of using BI-RADS combined with SE to differentiate papillary lesions from non-papillary benign tumors. For differentiating between benign and malignant papillary lesions, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of BI-RADS was 0.568, whereas the AUC values of SE score, strain ratio and BI-RADS combined with SE were 0.517, 0.584 and 0.509, respectively (p > 0.05). For differentiating between papillary lesions and non-papillary benign lesions, the AUC of BI-RADS combined with SE was 0.835, which was higher than the values for BI-RADS (0.775) and SE (SE score: 0.648, strain ratio: 0.661) (p < 0.001). The specificity and accuracy of BI-RADS combined with SE were significantly higher than those for BI-RADS alone without a decrease in sensitivity (p < 0.05). SE could not improve the diagnostic efficiency of BI-RADS in differentiating between benign and malignant papillary lesions. However, BI-RADS combined with SE could improve the specificity of BI-RADS without decrease in sensitivity for differentiating breast papillary lesions from non-papillary benign lesions.

摘要

基于我们之前的研究结果以及其他学者的发现,弹性应变率成像(SE)假阳性诊断中最常见的组织学类型是乳头状瘤。我们研究的目的是评估SE是否有助于在传统超声下鉴别良性和恶性乳头状病变,以及乳头状病变与其他常见的乳腺良性病变。我们纳入了我院89例乳头状病变的数据,其中包括74例良性乳头状病变和15例恶性乳头状病变。此外,选择198例非乳头状良性肿瘤作为对照组,包括126例纤维腺瘤和72例纤维囊性乳腺病。所有患者均签署了书面知情同意书。所有乳腺病变患者均接受了传统超声和SE检查。比较了乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)分类及SE评分在鉴别良性和恶性乳头状病变时的敏感性、特异性和准确性。然后,我们探讨了使用BI-RADS联合SE来鉴别乳头状病变与非乳头状良性肿瘤的可能性。对于鉴别良性和恶性乳头状病变,BI-RADS的受试者操作特征曲线(AUC)下面积为0.568,而SE评分、应变率以及BI-RADS联合SE的AUC值分别为0.517、0.584和0.509(p>0.05)。对于鉴别乳头状病变与非乳头状良性病变,BI-RADS联合SE的AUC为0.835,高于BI-RADS(0.775)和SE(SE评分:0.648,应变率:0.661)的值(p<0.001)。BI-RADS联合SE的特异性和准确性显著高于单独使用BI-RADS,且敏感性未降低(p<0.05)。SE不能提高BI-RADS鉴别良性和恶性乳头状病变的诊断效率。然而,BI-RADS联合SE可提高BI-RADS在鉴别乳腺乳头状病变与非乳头状良性病变时的特异性,且敏感性未降低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验