Comparison of strain and acoustic radiation force impulse elastography of breast lesions by qualitative evaluation.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic performance of conventional strain elastography (CSE) and acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) induced SE for qualitative assessment of breast lesions and evaluate the additional value of the two techniques combined with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) respectively for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.

METHODS

In a cohort of 110 women, the conventional ultrasound (US) features and the elasticity scores of CSE and ARFI induced SE were recorded. The diagnostic performances of BI-RADS, elastography and BI-RADS plus elastography were evaluated, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity and accuracy.

RESULTS

Pathologically, there were forty-eight malignant and sixty-two benign breast lesions in the final analysis. The AUCs for CSE and ARFI induced SE are similar (CSE, 0.807; ARFI induced SE, 0.846; p > 0.05), however, the specificity of the latter method was significantly higher than that of CSE (83.9% vs. 58.1%, p = 0.004) in differentiating breast lesions. The accuracy and specificity of BI-RADS plus ARFI induced SE (84.5%, 80.6%, respectively) were significantly higher than BI-RADS alone (73.6%, 54.8%, respectively) and BI-RADS plus conventional SE (72.7%, 56.5%, respectively), respectively (p < 0.05) without loss of sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that BI-RADS plus ARFI induced SE had a better diagnostic performance in the diagnosis of breast lesions in comparison with BI-RADS alone or BI-RADS plus CSE.