Li Dan-Dan, Xu Hui-Xiong, Guo Le-Hang, Bo Xiao-Wan, Li Xiao-Long, Wu Rong, Xu Jun-Mei, Zhang Yi-Feng, Zhang Kun
Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, No. 301, Yanchangzhong Road, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, No. 301, Yanchangzhong Road, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Eur Radiol. 2016 Sep;26(9):3290-300. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4163-8. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a new method of combined two-dimensional shear wave elastography (i.e. virtual touch imaging quantification, VTIQ) and ultrasound (US) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions.
From September 2014 to December 2014, 276 patients with 296 pathologically proven breast lesions were enrolled in this study. The conventional US images were interpreted by two independent readers. The diagnosis performances of BI-RADS and combined BI-RADS and VTIQ were evaluated, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity and specificity. Observer consistency was also evaluated.
Pathologically, 212 breast lesions were benign and 84 were malignant. Compared with BI-RADS alone, the AUROCs and specificities of the combined method for both readers increased significantly (AUROC: 0.862 vs. 0.693 in reader 1, 0.861 vs. 0.730 in reader 2; specificity: 91.5 % vs. 38.7 % in reader 1, 94.8 % vs. 47.2 % in reader 2; all P < .05). The Kappa value between the two readers for BI-RADS assessment was 0.614, and 0.796 for the combined method.
The combined VTIQ and BI-RADS had a better diagnostic performance in the diagnosis of breast lesions in comparison with BI-RADS alone.
• Combination of conventional ultrasound and elastography distinguishes breast cancers more effectively. • Combination of conventional ultrasound and elastography increases observer consistency. • BI-RADS weights more than the 2D-SWE with an increase in malignancy probability.
评估二维剪切波弹性成像新方法(即虚拟触诊成像定量分析,VTIQ)与超声(US)乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)联合应用在乳腺病变鉴别诊断中的诊断性能。
2014年9月至2014年12月,本研究纳入了276例经病理证实有296个乳腺病变的患者。由两名独立阅片者解读常规超声图像。评估BI-RADS以及联合BI-RADS和VTIQ的诊断性能,包括受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)、敏感性和特异性。还评估了观察者间的一致性。
病理检查显示,212个乳腺病变为良性,84个为恶性。与单独使用BI-RADS相比,联合方法对两位阅片者的AUROC和特异性均显著提高(阅片者1:AUROC为0.862对0.693,阅片者2:AUROC为0.861对0.730;特异性:阅片者1为91.5%对38.7%,阅片者2为94.8%对47.2%;均P<0.05)。两位阅片者对BI-RADS评估的Kappa值为0.614,联合方法的Kappa值为0.796。
与单独使用BI-RADS相比,VTIQ与BI-RADS联合应用在乳腺病变诊断中具有更好的诊断性能。
• 传统超声与弹性成像联合能更有效地鉴别乳腺癌。• 传统超声与弹性成像联合可提高观察者间的一致性。• 随着恶性概率增加,BI-RADS比二维剪切波弹性成像权重更大。