Suppr超能文献

模拟根管预备前后往复式器械的锉尖尺寸

Flute and Shank Dimensions of Reciprocating Instruments before and after Simulated Root Canal shaping.

作者信息

Sampaio Felipe C, Brito Ana Pp, Veloso Heloisa Hp, de Alencar Ana Hg, Decurcio Daniel de A, de Figueiredo José Ap, Estrela Carlos

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Instituto Tocantinense Presidente Antônio Carlos, Porto Nacional Tocantins, Brazil, e-mail:

Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Instituto Tocantinense Presidente Antônio Carlos, Porto Nacional Tocantins, Brazil.

出版信息

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Mar 1;18(3):198-204.

Abstract

AIM

This study analyzed the effect of the dimensions of the flute and shank in the first 4 mm of instrument tips on the deformation and dimensional changes of reciprocating instruments after root canal shaping (RCS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The reciprocating instruments used were Reciproc R25, R40, and R50; WaveOne Small, Primary, and Large; and Unicone #20, #25, and #40. Scanning electron microscopy images of the first 4 mm of the tip were acquired at 30× magnification before and after simulated curved root canals were shaped. Each instrument was used only once. The images were transferred to the AxioVision software to measure the flute area (μm), shank area (μm), flute length (μm), and cross-sectional diameter (μm). Student's t test for paired samples was used to compare differences before and after RCS, and analysis of variance followed by the Tukey test, to compare differences between instruments of similar sizes. The instruments were classified according to deformations after RCS.

RESULTS

Reciproc instruments had larger flutes and smaller shanks. The Reciproc R40 had significant differences in cross-sectional diameter at 0.5 mm from the tip. Reciproc had no plastic deformations. Unicone #20 instruments had significant differences in cross-sectional diameter at 1.5 and 3.0 mm from the tip, and #25 instruments had differences at 1.5 and 3.0 mm and in length of the second and third flutes. One #20 and three #40 instruments had plastic deformations. The differences in length of the first and fourth flutes of WaveOne Primary and in cross-sectional diameter at 2.0 mm from the tip of WaveOne Large were significant. Two of three WaveOne Large instruments had plastic deformations.

CONCLUSION

Reciproc instruments had greater flute areas and lengths and smaller shanks than Unicone and WaveOne instruments of similar sizes. Reciproc instruments had a greater flute-to-shank ratio. WaveOne instruments had the lowest flute-to-shank ratio. Unicone instruments had the most plastic deformations. Instruments with larger flutes and smaller shanks had fewer plastic deformations after curved RCS.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The knowledge of mechanical behavior before choosing the endodontic instrument may avoid fracture, regardless of the clinical condition, and it is essential to the success of root canal treatment.

摘要

目的

本研究分析了器械尖端前4mm处的凹槽和柄部尺寸对根管预备后往复式器械变形及尺寸变化的影响。

材料与方法

使用的往复式器械有Reciproc R25、R40和R50;WaveOne Small、Primary和Large;以及Unicone #20、#25和#40。在模拟弯曲根管预备前后,以30倍放大倍数获取器械尖端前4mm的扫描电子显微镜图像。每个器械仅使用一次。将图像传输至AxioVision软件,以测量凹槽面积(μm)、柄部面积(μm)、凹槽长度(μm)和横截面直径(μm)。采用配对样本的Student's t检验比较根管预备前后的差异,并采用方差分析及Tukey检验比较相似尺寸器械之间的差异。根据根管预备后的变形情况对器械进行分类。

结果

Reciproc器械的凹槽较大,柄部较小。Reciproc R40在距尖端0.5mm处的横截面直径有显著差异。Reciproc没有塑性变形。Unicone #20器械在距尖端1.5mm和3.0mm处的横截面直径有显著差异,#25器械在距尖端1.5mm和3.0mm处以及第二和第三凹槽长度方面有差异。1支#20和3支#40器械有塑性变形。WaveOne Primary的第一和第四凹槽长度以及WaveOne Large距尖端2.0mm处的横截面直径差异显著。3支WaveOne Large器械中有2支有塑性变形。

结论

与相似尺寸的Unicone和WaveOne器械相比,Reciproc器械的凹槽面积和长度更大,柄部更小。Reciproc器械的凹槽与柄部比例更大。WaveOne器械的凹槽与柄部比例最低。Unicone器械的塑性变形最多。在弯曲根管预备后,凹槽大、柄部小的器械塑性变形较少。

临床意义

在选择根管治疗器械之前了解其力学行为,无论临床情况如何,都可避免器械折断,这对根管治疗的成功至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验