Bjerke Benjamin T, Zuchelli Daniel M, Nemani Venu M, Emerson Ronald G, Kim Han Jo, Boachie-Adjei Oheneba
Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.
FOCOS Hospital, P.O. Box KD 779 Kanda, Accra, Ghana, Africa.
Spine Deform. 2017 Mar;5(2):117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2016.11.002.
Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring has become a standard tool for mitigating neurologic injury during spinal deformity surgery. Significant monitoring changes during deformity correction are relatively uncommon. This study characterizes precipitating factors for neurologic injury and relates significant events and postoperative neurologic prognosis.
All spinal deformity surgeries at a West African hospital over a 12-month period were reviewed. Patients were included if complete operative reports, monitoring data, and postoperative neurologic examinations were available for review. Surgical and systemic triggers of monitoring events were recorded and neurologic status was followed for 6 weeks postoperatively.
Eighty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. The average age was 14 years (3-28). The average kyphosis was 108° (54°-176°) and average scoliosis was 100° (48°-177°). There were 44 separate neurologic events in 34 patients (39%). The most common triggers were traction or positioning (16), posterior column osteotomies/vertebral column resections (9/1), and distraction, corrective maneuvers, or implant placement (12). On surgery completion, 100% (12/12) of events from non-osteotomy-related surgical procedures, 75% (12/16) of events from traction or positioning resolved; however, 0% (0/10) of events from osteotomies resolved completely. Eight percent (7/88) had new neurologic deficits postoperatively, all with intraoperative monitoring changes. In 6 of these 7 patients, the event was attributed to an osteotomy; in 1 patient the cause was not determined. At 6-week follow-up, all patients had some preserved motor function bilaterally with the ability to walk (ASIA D/E) or recovered completely.
Intraoperative signal changes were most frequently from traction or positioning. However, the most common cause of persistent neurologic deterioration and the only cause of postoperative neurologic deficit was the performance of osteotomies. Unlike traction- or instrument-related correction, osteotomies produce irreversible changes, from canal intrusion or sudden localized deformity change. The incidence of postoperative neurologic deficit is very low when the inciting cause is reversed; however, osteotomy-related events are irreversible, with a high incidence of associated lasting neurologic injury.
术中神经生理监测已成为脊柱畸形手术中减轻神经损伤的标准工具。畸形矫正过程中显著的监测变化相对少见。本研究对神经损伤的诱发因素进行了特征描述,并关联了重大事件与术后神经预后情况。
回顾了西非一家医院12个月内所有的脊柱畸形手术。若有完整的手术报告、监测数据及术后神经检查结果可供查阅,则纳入该患者。记录监测事件的手术及全身诱发因素,并在术后6周对神经状态进行随访。
88例患者符合纳入标准。平均年龄为14岁(3 - 岁)。平均后凸畸形为108°(54° - 176°),平均脊柱侧凸为100°(48° - 177°))。34例患者(39%)发生了44次独立的神经事件。最常见的诱发因素是牵引或体位摆放(16次)、后路椎体截骨术/脊柱切除术(9/1次)以及撑开、矫正操作或植入物置入(12次)。手术结束时,非截骨相关手术操作导致的事件中有100%(12/12)、牵引或体位摆放导致的事件中有75%(12/16)得到缓解;然而,截骨术导致的事件中0%(0/10)完全缓解。8%(7/88)的患者术后出现新的神经功能缺损,均伴有术中监测变化。在这7例患者中的6例中,事件归因于截骨术;1例患者的病因未明确。在6周随访时,所有患者双侧均保留了一定运动功能,能够行走(美国脊髓损伤协会分级D/E级)或完全恢复。
术中信号变化最常源于牵引或体位摆放。然而,持续性神经功能恶化的最常见原因以及术后神经功能缺损的唯一原因是截骨术的实施。与牵引或器械相关的矫正不同,截骨术会因椎管侵犯或突然的局部畸形改变而产生不可逆变化。当诱发原因得到纠正时,术后神经功能缺损的发生率非常低;然而,与截骨术相关的事件是不可逆的,伴有持久神经损伤的高发生率。 (注:原文中“3 - 岁”括号内表述有误,推测可能是“3 - 28岁”,译文已按此修正)