Lataro Renata Maria, Silva Luiz Eduardo Virgilio, Silva Carlos Alberto Aguiar, Salgado Helio Cesar, Fazan Rubens
Department of Physiology, School of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Physiol. 2017 Jun 1;595(11):3319-3330. doi: 10.1113/JP274065. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
The integrity of the baroreflex control of sympathetic activity in heart failure (HF) remains under debate. We proposed the use of the sequence method to assess the baroreflex control of renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA). The sequence method assesses the spontaneous arterial pressure (AP) fluctuations and their related changes in heart rate (or other efferent responses), providing the sensitivity and the effectiveness of the baroreflex. Effectiveness refers to the fraction of spontaneous AP changes that elicits baroreflex-mediated variations in the efferent response. Using three different approaches, we showed that the baroreflex sensitivity between AP and RSNA is not altered in early HF rats. However, the sequence method provided evidence that the effectiveness of baroreflex in changing RSNA in response to AP changes is markedly decreased in HF. The results help us better understand the baroreflex control of the sympathetic nerve activity.
In heart failure (HF), the reflex control of the heart rate is known to be markedly impaired; however, the baroreceptor control of the sympathetic drive remains under debate. Applying the sequence method to a series of arterial pressure (AP) and renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA), we demonstrated a clear dysfunction in the baroreflex control of sympathetic activity in rats with early HF. We analysed the baroreflex control of the sympathetic drive using three different approaches: AP vs. RSNA curve, cross-spectral analysis and sequence method between AP and RSNA. The sequence method also provides the baroreflex effectiveness index (BEI), which represents the percentage of AP ramps that actually produce a reflex response. The methods were applied to control rats and rats with HF induced by myocardial infarction. None of the methods employed to assess the sympathetic baroreflex gain were able to detect any differences between the control and the HF group. However, rats with HF exhibited a lower BEI compared to the controls. Moreover, an optimum delay of 1 beat was observed, i.e. 1 beat is required for the RSNA to respond after AP changing, which corroborates with the findings related to the timing between these two variables. For delay 1, the BEI of the controls was 0.45 ± 0.03, whereas the BEI of rats with HF was 0.29 ± 0.09 (P < 0.05). These data demonstrate that while the gain of the baroreflex is not affected in early HF, its effectiveness is markedly decreased. The analysis of the spontaneous changes in AP and RSNA using the sequence method provides novel insights into arterial baroreceptor reflex function.
心力衰竭(HF)中压力反射对交感神经活动的控制完整性仍存在争议。我们提出使用序列法评估肾交感神经活动(RSNA)的压力反射控制。序列法评估自发性动脉压(AP)波动及其相关的心率变化(或其他传出反应),提供压力反射的敏感性和有效性。有效性是指引起传出反应中压力反射介导变化的自发性AP变化的比例。通过三种不同方法,我们发现早期HF大鼠中AP与RSNA之间的压力反射敏感性未改变。然而,序列法提供的证据表明,HF时压力反射改变RSNA以响应AP变化的有效性显著降低。这些结果有助于我们更好地理解交感神经活动的压力反射控制。
已知在心力衰竭(HF)中,心率的反射控制明显受损;然而,压力感受器对交感神经驱动的控制仍存在争议。将序列法应用于一系列动脉压(AP)和肾交感神经活动(RSNA),我们证明早期HF大鼠交感神经活动压力反射控制存在明显功能障碍。我们使用三种不同方法分析交感神经驱动的压力反射控制:AP与RSNA曲线、交叉谱分析以及AP与RSNA之间的序列法。序列法还提供压力反射有效性指数(BEI),其代表实际产生反射反应的AP斜坡的百分比。这些方法应用于对照大鼠和心肌梗死诱导的HF大鼠。用于评估交感神经压力反射增益的方法均未能检测到对照组与HF组之间的任何差异。然而,与对照组相比,HF大鼠的BEI较低。此外,观察到最佳延迟为1个心动周期,即AP变化后RSNA需要1个心动周期做出反应,这与这两个变量之间时间关系的研究结果一致。对于延迟1,对照组的BEI为0.45±0.03,而HF大鼠的BEI为0.29±0.09(P<0.05)。这些数据表明,虽然早期HF时压力反射增益未受影响,但其有效性显著降低。使用序列法分析AP和RSNA的自发性变化为动脉压力感受器反射功能提供了新的见解。