Suppr超能文献

婴儿可能的严重感染的治疗:在马拉维对60日龄以下婴儿进行的一项关于肠外注射苄青霉素和庆大霉素与头孢曲松对比的开放性随机安全性试验。

The Treatment of Possible Severe Infection in Infants: An Open Randomized Safety Trial of Parenteral Benzylpenicillin and Gentamicin Versus Ceftriaxone in Infants <60 days of Age in Malawi.

作者信息

Molyneux Elizabeth M, Dube Queen, Banda Francis M, Chiume Msandeni, Singini Isaac, Mallewa Macpherson, Schwalbe Edward C, Heyderman Robert S

机构信息

From the *Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, †Department of Pediatrics, Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, and ‡John Hopkins Research Unit College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi; §Department of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; ¶Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi; and ‖Division of Infection & Immunity, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017 Dec;36(12):e328-e333. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001576.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization recommends benzylpenicillin and gentamicin as antimicrobial treatment for infants with sepsis in low-income settings, and ceftriaxone or cefotaxime as an alternative. In a meta-analysis from 13 low-income settings, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella spp. and Escherichia coli accounted for 55% of infants with sepsis. In a review of bacterial meningitis, resistance to third generation cephalosporins was >50% of all isolates, and 44% of Gram-negative isolates were gentamicin resistant. However, ceftriaxone may cause neonatal jaundice, and gentamicin may cause deafness. Therefore, we compared parenteral benzylpenicillin plus gentamicin with ceftriaxone as first-line treatment, assessing outcome and adverse events.

METHODS

This was an open randomized trial carried out in the Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi, from 2010 to 2013. Infants <60 days of age with possible severe sepsis received either benzylpenicillin and gentamicin or ceftriaxone. Adverse events and outcomes were recorded until 6 months post discharge.

RESULTS

Three-hundred forty-eight infants were included in analyses. Outcome in the benzylpenicillin and gentamicin and ceftriaxone groups was similar; deaths were 13.7% and 16.5% and sequelae were 14.5% and 11.2%, respectively. More infants in the penicillin/gentamicin group required phototherapy: 15% versus 5%, P = 0.03. Thirteen (6%) survivors had bilateral hearing loss. There was no difference between the treatment groups. By 6 months post discharge, 11 more infants had died, and 17 more children were found to have sequelae.

CONCLUSIONS

Ceftriaxone and gentamicin are safe for infants in our setting. Infants should receive long-term follow-up as many poor outcomes occurred after hospital discharge.

摘要

背景

世界卫生组织建议在低收入环境中,将苄星青霉素和庆大霉素作为败血症婴儿的抗菌治疗药物,头孢曲松或头孢噻肟作为替代药物。在一项来自13个低收入环境的荟萃分析中,金黄色葡萄球菌、克雷伯菌属和大肠杆菌占败血症婴儿的55%。在一项细菌性脑膜炎综述中,对第三代头孢菌素的耐药率在所有分离株中>50%,44%的革兰氏阴性分离株对庆大霉素耐药。然而,头孢曲松可能会导致新生儿黄疸,庆大霉素可能会导致耳聋。因此,我们比较了静脉注射苄星青霉素加庆大霉素与头孢曲松作为一线治疗的效果,评估了治疗结果和不良事件。

方法

这是一项在马拉维布兰太尔伊丽莎白女王中央医院于2010年至2013年进行的开放性随机试验。年龄<60天、可能患有严重败血症的婴儿接受苄星青霉素和庆大霉素或头孢曲松治疗。记录不良事件和治疗结果,直至出院后6个月。

结果

348名婴儿纳入分析。苄星青霉素和庆大霉素组与头孢曲松组的治疗结果相似;死亡率分别为13.7%和16.5%,后遗症发生率分别为14.5%和11.2%。青霉素/庆大霉素组需要光疗的婴儿更多:分别为15%和5%,P = 0.03。13名(6%)幸存者有双侧听力丧失。治疗组之间无差异。出院后6个月时,又有11名婴儿死亡,另有17名儿童被发现有后遗症。

结论

在我们的环境中,头孢曲松和庆大霉素对婴儿是安全的。由于许多不良后果发生在出院后,婴儿应接受长期随访。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Antibiotic regimens for early-onset neonatal sepsis.新生儿早发性败血症的抗生素治疗方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 17;5(5):CD013837. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013837.pub2.
5
Antibiotic regimens for late-onset neonatal sepsis.晚发型新生儿败血症的抗生素治疗方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 8;5(5):CD013836. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013836.pub2.

本文引用的文献

10
Safety of ceftriaxone sodium at extremes of age.头孢曲松钠在极端年龄时的安全性。
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2008 Sep;7(5):515-23. doi: 10.1517/14740338.7.5.515.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验