• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新诊断血液系统恶性肿瘤患者及其非正式照护者之间的共同决策与信息提供:并非“一刀切”。

Shared decision-making and providing information among newly diagnosed patients with hematological malignancies and their informal caregivers: Not "one-size-fits-all".

作者信息

Rood J A J, Nauta I H, Witte B I, Stam F, van Zuuren F J, Manenschijn A, Huijgens P C, Verdonck-de Leeuw I M, Zweegman S

机构信息

Department of Hematology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Internal medicine, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Psychooncology. 2017 Dec;26(12):2040-2047. doi: 10.1002/pon.4414. Epub 2017 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1002/pon.4414
PMID:28264148
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To optimize personalized medicine for patients with hematological malignancies (HM), we find that knowledge on patient preferences with regard to information provision and shared decision-making (SDM) is of the utmost importance. The aim of this study was to investigate the SDM preference and the satisfaction with and need for information among newly diagnosed HM patients and their informal caregivers, in relation to sociodemographic and clinical factors, cognitive coping style, and health related quality of life.

METHODS

Newly diagnosed patients and their caregivers were asked to complete the Hematology Information Needs Questionnaire, the Information Satisfaction Questionnaire, and the Threatening Medical Situations Inventory. Medical records were consulted to retrieve sociodemographic and clinical factors and comorbidity by means of the ACE-27.

RESULTS

Questionnaires were completed by 138 patients and 95 caregivers. Shared decision-making was preferred by the majority of patients (75%) and caregivers (88%), especially patients treated with curative intent (OR = 2.7, P = .041), and patients (OR = 1.2, P < .001) and caregivers (OR = 1.2, P = .001) with a higher monitoring cognitive coping style (MCCS). Among patients, total need for information was related to MCCS (P = .012), and need for specific information was related to MCCS and several clinical factors. Importantly, dissatisfaction with the information they received was reported by a third of the patients and caregivers, especially patients who wanted SDM (χ  = 7.3, P = .007), and patients with a higher MCCS (OR = 0.94, P = .038).

CONCLUSION

The majority of HM patients want to be involved in SDM, but the received information is not sufficient. Patient-tailored information is urgently needed, to improve SDM.

摘要

目的

为优化血液系统恶性肿瘤(HM)患者的个性化医疗,我们发现了解患者在信息提供和共同决策(SDM)方面的偏好至关重要。本研究旨在调查新诊断的HM患者及其非正式照护者的SDM偏好、对信息的满意度和需求,并探讨其与社会人口学和临床因素、认知应对方式以及健康相关生活质量的关系。

方法

要求新诊断的患者及其照护者完成血液学信息需求问卷、信息满意度问卷和威胁性医疗情况量表。通过查阅病历,利用ACE - 27获取社会人口学和临床因素以及合并症信息。

结果

138名患者和95名照护者完成了问卷调查。大多数患者(75%)和照护者(88%)倾向于共同决策,尤其是接受根治性治疗的患者(OR = 2.7,P = 0.041),以及具有较高监测认知应对方式(MCCS)的患者(OR = 1.2,P < 0.001)和照护者(OR = 1.2,P = 0.001)。在患者中,信息总需求与MCCS相关(P = 0.012),特定信息需求与MCCS和若干临床因素相关。重要的是,三分之一的患者和照护者对所获信息不满意,尤其是那些希望进行共同决策的患者(χ = 7.3,P = 0.007),以及MCCS较高的患者(OR = 0.94,P = 0.038)。

结论

大多数HM患者希望参与共同决策,但所获信息不足。迫切需要针对患者量身定制信息,以改善共同决策。

相似文献

1
Shared decision-making and providing information among newly diagnosed patients with hematological malignancies and their informal caregivers: Not "one-size-fits-all".新诊断血液系统恶性肿瘤患者及其非正式照护者之间的共同决策与信息提供:并非“一刀切”。
Psychooncology. 2017 Dec;26(12):2040-2047. doi: 10.1002/pon.4414. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
2
Cognitive coping style (monitoring and blunting) and the need for information, information satisfaction and shared decision making among patients with haematological malignancies.血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的认知应对方式(监控与钝化)、信息需求、信息满意度及共同决策
Psychooncology. 2015 May;24(5):564-71. doi: 10.1002/pon.3699. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
3
Perceived need for information among patients with a haematological malignancy: associations with information satisfaction and treatment decision-making preferences.血液系统恶性肿瘤患者对信息的感知需求:与信息满意度及治疗决策偏好的关联
Hematol Oncol. 2015 Jun;33(2):85-98. doi: 10.1002/hon.2138. Epub 2014 May 9.
4
How Does a Shared Decision-Making (SDM) Intervention for Oncologists Affect Participation Style and Preference Matching in Patients with Breast and Colon Cancer?针对肿瘤学家的共同决策(SDM)干预措施如何影响乳腺癌和结肠癌患者的参与方式及偏好匹配?
J Cancer Educ. 2018 Jun;33(3):708-715. doi: 10.1007/s13187-016-1146-7.
5
When do cancer patients regret their treatment decision? A path analysis of the influence of clinicians' communication styles and the match of decision-making styles on decision regret.癌症患者何时会后悔他们的治疗决定?一项关于临床医生沟通方式及决策风格匹配对决策后悔影响的路径分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 May;99(5):739-46. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.11.019. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
6
Cancer patients' perspective on shared decision-making and decision aids in oncology.癌症患者对肿瘤学中共同决策和决策辅助的看法。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Jun;147(6):1725-1732. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03579-6. Epub 2021 Mar 7.
7
Barriers and facilitators for shared decision making in older patients with multiple chronic conditions: a systematic review.老年多病共存患者共同决策的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Feb 6;21(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02050-y.
8
Does the use of shared decision-making consultation behaviors increase treatment decision-making satisfaction among Chinese women facing decision for breast cancer surgery?使用共同决策咨询行为是否会提高面临乳腺癌手术决策的中国女性对治疗决策的满意度?
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Feb;94(2):243-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.11.006. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
9
Inpatient satisfaction with medical information received from caregivers: an observational study on the effect of social deprivation.住院患者对从医护人员处获得的医疗信息的满意度:一项关于社会剥夺影响的观察性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 23;17(1):769. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2728-8.
10
Shared decision making and other variables as correlates of satisfaction with health care decisions in a United States national survey.在一项美国全国性调查中,共享决策和其他变量与医疗保健决策满意度的相关性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jul;88(1):100-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.02.010. Epub 2012 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Heterogeneity and associated factors of information needs among patients with hematological malignancies in China: a latent profile analysis.中国血液系统恶性肿瘤患者信息需求的异质性及相关因素:一项潜在类别分析
Support Care Cancer. 2025 May 29;33(6):511. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09558-8.
2
Measuring readiness for nurse-led shared decision making in clinical practice: development and first testing of the RSDM-N scale.衡量临床实践中护士主导的共同决策准备情况:RSDM-N量表的开发与首次测试
BMC Nurs. 2025 Apr 14;24(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03070-4.
3
Information preferences of patients with chronic blood cancer: A qualitative investigation.
慢性血液病患者的信息偏好:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 20;19(8):e0293772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293772. eCollection 2024.
4
The association of cognitive coping style with patient preferences in a patient-led follow-up study among colorectal cancer survivors.在一项由患者主导的结直肠癌幸存者随访研究中,认知应对方式与患者偏好之间的关联。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Aug 1;32(8):564. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08758-y.
5
Experiences of treatment decision-making among older newly diagnosed adults with acute myeloid leukemia: a qualitative descriptive study.老年初诊急性髓系白血病患者治疗决策体验的定性描述性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Feb 28;32(3):197. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08397-3.
6
Patient readiness for shared decision making about treatment: Conceptualisation and development of the Ready.患者对治疗的共同决策准备:概念化和 Ready 的发展。
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e13995. doi: 10.1111/hex.13995.
7
Balancing risks and rewards: How hematologists discuss uncertainty in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes.权衡风险与回报:血液学家如何讨论异基因造血细胞移植结果中的不确定性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2024 Jun;123:108177. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108177. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
8
Communication Strategies of Transplant Hematologists in High-Risk Decision-Making Conversations.移植血液学家在高风险决策对话中的沟通策略。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2024 Apr;20(4):538-548. doi: 10.1200/OP.23.00574. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
9
Psychological empowerment and quality of life in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients: A quantitative study.心理赋权与造血干细胞移植患者的生活质量:一项定量研究。
Nurs Open. 2023 Dec;10(12):7611-7621. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2000. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
10
Experiences of Using Patient Decision Aids for Decisions About Cancer Treatment: A Meta-Aggregation of Qualitative Studies.使用患者决策辅助工具进行癌症治疗决策的经验:定性研究的元聚合
Cancer Nurs. 2025;48(2):81-88. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000001263. Epub 2023 Jul 11.