• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衡量临床实践中护士主导的共同决策准备情况:RSDM-N量表的开发与首次测试

Measuring readiness for nurse-led shared decision making in clinical practice: development and first testing of the RSDM-N scale.

作者信息

Meng Meiqi, Chen Sihan, Yang Dan, Zhang Xiaoyan, Yang Yajuan, Wang Ziyan, Zhang Jingyuan, Li Xuejing, Hao Yufang

机构信息

School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.

Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Centre of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, China.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2025 Apr 14;24(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03070-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12912-025-03070-4
PMID:40229796
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11995544/
Abstract

OBJECT

To develop a scale to measure the organizational readiness for change (ORC) in nurse-led shared decision-making (SDM) in clinical practice of China, test its reliability and validity, and conduct an analysis of the current status of nurse-led SDM readiness.

METHODS

This study follows the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology guidance and has two phases. The first phase, based on ORC theory, an item pool was formed through literature review, qualitative interviews and group discussions. Two rounds of Delphi consultations were conducted to optimize items, developed an initial scale. Cognitive interviews were then conducted to understand the target population's comprehension of each item, addressing differences during the development process, resulting in the first scale version. In the second phase, the scale underwent reliability and validity testing, and the results were analyzed to assess the current status of nurse-led SDM readiness.

RESULTS

The final scale consists of 55 items across five dimensions.The overall Cronbach's α coefficient is 0.987, with a split-half reliability of 0.911, a test-retest reliability of 0.904, and an average content validity index of 0.989, indicating good reliability and validity. A field test was conducted among 496 nurses, revealing that the total score of nurses' SDM readiness ranged from 118 to 270, with an average of 209.79 ± 35.82.

CONCLUSION

The RSDM-N scale exhibits sufficient measurement qualities for assessing nurse-led SDM readiness in China, guiding the implementation of nurse-led SDM.

摘要

目的

开发一个量表,用以衡量中国临床实践中护士主导的共同决策(SDM)的组织变革准备度(ORC),测试其信效度,并对护士主导的SDM准备度现状进行分析。

方法

本研究遵循基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)方法学指南,分为两个阶段。第一阶段,基于ORC理论,通过文献回顾、质性访谈和小组讨论形成条目池。进行两轮德尔菲专家咨询以优化条目,形成初始量表。随后进行认知访谈,以了解目标人群对每个条目的理解,解决开发过程中的差异问题,形成第一版量表。第二阶段,对量表进行信效度测试,并对结果进行分析,以评估护士主导的SDM准备度现状。

结果

最终量表由五个维度的55个条目组成。总体Cronbach's α系数为0.987,分半信度为0.911,重测信度为0.904,平均内容效度指数为0.989,表明具有良好的信效度。对496名护士进行了现场测试,结果显示护士的SDM准备度总分在118至270分之间,平均分为209.79±35.82。

结论

RSDM-N量表在评估中国护士主导的SDM准备度方面具有足够的测量质量,可为护士主导的SDM实施提供指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8faf/11995544/7c6c62d8c64c/12912_2025_3070_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8faf/11995544/92c9d46fb4f2/12912_2025_3070_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8faf/11995544/7c6c62d8c64c/12912_2025_3070_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8faf/11995544/92c9d46fb4f2/12912_2025_3070_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8faf/11995544/7c6c62d8c64c/12912_2025_3070_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring readiness for nurse-led shared decision making in clinical practice: development and first testing of the RSDM-N scale.衡量临床实践中护士主导的共同决策准备情况:RSDM-N量表的开发与首次测试
BMC Nurs. 2025 Apr 14;24(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03070-4.
2
Development, validity, and reliability testing of a research readiness self-evaluation scale with nurses: A cross-sectional study.护士研究准备自我评估量表的开发、效度和信度测试:一项横断面研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Feb 7;104(6):e41385. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041385.
3
Development and validation of the nurses' touch comfort evaluation scale in China.中国护士触摸舒适度评估量表的研制与验证
BMC Nurs. 2025 Feb 14;24(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02804-8.
4
Patient readiness for shared decision making about treatment: Conceptualisation and development of the Ready.患者对治疗的共同决策准备:概念化和 Ready 的发展。
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e13995. doi: 10.1111/hex.13995.
5
Evaluation of reliability and validity regarding the Chinese version of Critical Cultural Competence Scale for clinical nurses.临床护士关键文化能力量表中文版的信度和效度评价。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Oct 28;47(10):1425-1434. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.210695.
6
Psychometric properties assessment of Chinese version of work readiness scale for graduate nurses (WRS-GN) and associated factors of work readiness: Two cross-sectional studies.中文版护士工作准备度量表(WRS-GN)的心理计量学特性评估及其工作准备度的相关因素:两项横断面研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Jun;89:104416. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104416. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
7
The Turkish version of the Casey-Fink Readiness for Practice Scale: A validity and reliability study.《凯西-芬克实践准备量表》土耳其语版的效度和信度研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Jul;70:103667. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103667. Epub 2023 May 18.
8
The biosafety incident response competence scale for clinical nursing staff: a development and validation study.临床护理人员生物安全事件应对能力量表的编制与验证研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 Mar 14;23(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01848-6.
9
Development and validation of two versions of the Nurse-Patient Mutuality in Chronic Illness scale.开发并验证慢性疾病护患互信量表的两个版本。
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Aug;79(8):3170-3182. doi: 10.1111/jan.15594. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
10
Measurement properties of self-reported clinical decision-making instruments in nursing: A COSMIN systematic review.护理中自我报告的临床决策工具的测量属性:一项COSMIN系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2023 Mar 16;5:100122. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100122. eCollection 2023 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and psychometric testing of the preceptors' orientation competence instrument (POCI).导师定向能力工具(POCI)的开发与心理测量学测试。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Oct;64:103445. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103445. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
2
Measurement of Practices-Knowledge-Attitudes of the Nursing Process: Systematic Review.护理过程实践-知识-态度测量:系统评价。
Invest Educ Enferm. 2021 Oct;39(3). doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v39n3e15.
3
Development and testing of the shared decision-making attitudes scale among nurses in Taiwan: a cross-sectional scale development study.
台湾地区护理人员共享决策态度量表的编制与测试:一项横断面量表研制研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 14;11(9):e044733. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044733.
4
Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in hospitals from policy to practice: a systematic review.医院中从政策到实践的共享决策的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2021 Jul 31;16(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01142-y.
5
A systematic review of healthcare professionals' core competency instruments.对医疗保健专业人员核心能力评估工具的系统评价。
Nurs Health Sci. 2021 Mar;23(1):87-102. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12804. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
6
The role of hospital nurses in shared decision-making about life-prolonging treatment: A qualitative interview study.医院护士在有关延长生命治疗的共同决策中的作用:一项定性访谈研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Jan;77(1):296-307. doi: 10.1111/jan.14549. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
7
Implementation Science in Practice.实践中的实施科学
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2021;27(2):100-101. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001241.
8
Exploring healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitudes and experiences of shared decision making in rheumatology.探讨风湿病学中医疗保健专业人员在共享决策方面的知识、态度和经验。
RMD Open. 2020 Jan;6(1). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001121.
9
Measures of Workplace Inclusion: A Systematic Review Using the COSMIN Methodology.工作场所包容性测量工具:使用 COSMIN 方法学的系统评价。
J Occup Rehabil. 2020 Sep;30(3):420-454. doi: 10.1007/s10926-020-09872-4.
10
Shared Decision Making: Effects of an Online Education Session on Knowledge, Attitudes, Adaptability, and Communication Skills Among Nurses.共同决策:在线教育课程对护士知识、态度、适应能力和沟通技巧的影响
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Dec 1;23(6):E93-E99. doi: 10.1188/19.CJON.E93-E99.