Emrick Preeti, Gentry Christine, Morowit Lauren
University of Maryland Center for Health and Homeland Security (CHHS), 500 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA.
Disaster Mil Med. 2016 Aug 31;2:13. doi: 10.1186/s40696-016-0023-6. eCollection 2016.
Despite the comparatively few cases of Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) that arose outside of Sierra Leone, Guinea, and Liberia in 2014, public health response partners around the world developed a patchwork of plans and policies to monitor thousands of people exposed to EVD, quarantine suspected cases, isolate confirmed cases, and close borders to prevent further spread of the disease. Deeply affected countries such as Sierra Leone, Guinea, and Liberia, as well as less affected countries such as the United States, Canada, and Australia developed special guidance regarding isolation and quarantine measures for EVD. The massive and well-publicized EVD response highlighted international challenges of public health laws and policies, many of which remain largely unchanged since their implementation. This article examines public health measures, including health surveillance and decedent disposition, and their effects on isolation and quarantine practices in six countries (Sierra Leone, Guinea, Liberia, United States, Canada, and Australia) in context of the 2014-2015 EVD response, and makes recommendations.
尽管2014年在塞拉利昂、几内亚和利比里亚以外出现的埃博拉病毒病(EVD)病例相对较少,但世界各地的公共卫生应对伙伴制定了一系列拼凑而成的计划和政策,以监测数千名接触过埃博拉病毒病的人员、隔离疑似病例、隔离确诊病例并关闭边境,防止疾病进一步传播。受影响严重的国家,如塞拉利昂、几内亚和利比里亚,以及受影响较小的国家,如美国、加拿大和澳大利亚,都制定了关于埃博拉病毒病隔离和检疫措施的特别指南。大规模且广为人知的埃博拉病毒病应对行动凸显了公共卫生法律和政策的国际挑战,其中许多自实施以来基本未变。本文考察了包括健康监测和死者处置在内的公共卫生措施,及其在2014 - 2015年埃博拉病毒病应对背景下对六个国家(塞拉利昂、几内亚、利比里亚、美国、加拿大和澳大利亚)隔离和检疫做法的影响,并提出建议。