Glanc Phyllis, Benacerraf Beryl, Bourne Tom, Brown Douglas, Coleman Beverly G, Crum Christopher, Dodge Jason, Levine Deborah, Pavlik Edward, Timmerman Dirk, Ueland Frederick R, Wolfman Wendy, Goldstein Steven R
Department of Radiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Ultrasound Med. 2017 May;36(5):849-863. doi: 10.1002/jum.14197. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
The First International Consensus Conference on Adnexal Masses was convened to thoroughly examine the state of the science and to formulate recommendations for clinical assessment and management. The panel included representatives of societies in the fields of gynecology, gynecologic oncology, radiology, and pathology and clinicians from Europe, Canada, and the United States. In the United States, there are approximately 9.1 surgeries per malignancy compared to the European International Ovarian Tumor Analysis center trials, with only 2.3 (oncology centers) and 5.9 (other centers) reported surgeries per malignancy, suggesting that there is room to improve our preoperative assessments. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin on "Management of Adnexal Masses," reaffirmed in 2015 (Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110:201-214), still states, "With the exception of simple cysts on a transvaginal ultrasound finding, most pelvic masses in postmenopausal women will require surgical intervention." The panel concluded that patients would benefit not only from a more conservative approach to many benign adnexal masses but also from optimization of physician referral patterns to a gynecologic oncologist in cases of suspected ovarian malignancies. A number of next-step options were offered to aid in management of cases with sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses. This process would provide an opportunity to improve risk stratification for indeterminate masses via the provision of alternatives, including but not limited to evidence-based risk-assessment algorithms and referral to an "expert sonologist" or to a gynecologic oncologist. The panel believed that these efforts to improve clinical management and preoperative triage patterns would ultimately improve patient care.
第一届附件包块国际共识会议召开,旨在全面审视科学现状,并制定临床评估与管理的建议。专家小组包括妇科、妇科肿瘤学、放射学和病理学领域学会的代表,以及来自欧洲、加拿大和美国的临床医生。在美国,每例恶性肿瘤的手术量约为9.1例,相比之下,欧洲国际卵巢肿瘤分析中心的试验中,每例恶性肿瘤报告的手术量仅为2.3例(肿瘤中心)和5.9例(其他中心),这表明我们的术前评估仍有改进空间。美国妇产科医师学会2015年重申的关于“附件包块管理”的实践公告(《妇产科学》2007年;110:201 - 214)仍指出,“除经阴道超声检查发现的单纯囊肿外,大多数绝经后女性的盆腔包块需要手术干预。”专家小组得出结论,患者不仅将从对许多良性附件包块采取更保守的方法中受益,而且在疑似卵巢恶性肿瘤的情况下,从优化医生转诊至妇科肿瘤学家的模式中受益。提供了一些后续步骤选项,以帮助管理超声检查结果不确定的附件包块病例。这一过程将通过提供替代方案,包括但不限于基于证据的风险评估算法以及转诊至“专家超声医师”或妇科肿瘤学家,为不确定包块改善风险分层提供机会。专家小组认为,这些改善临床管理和术前分诊模式的努力最终将改善患者护理。