Barton Debra L, Schroeder Kelliann C Fee, Banerjee Tanima, Wolf Sherry, Keith Timothy Z, Elkins Gary
1University of Michigan, School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI 2Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 3University of Texas, Austin, TX 4Baylor University, Waco, TX.
Menopause. 2017 Jul;24(7):774-782. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000837.
The need for effective nonhormonal treatments for hot flash management without unwanted side effects continues. The primary aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the effect of combining a nonhormonal pharmacologic agent with a behavioral treatment for hot flash reduction.
Seventy-one postmenopausal women were randomized to one of four groups: venlafaxine 75 mg + hypnosis (VH) versus venlafaxine 75 mg + sham hypnosis (VSH) versus a placebo pill + hypnosis (PH) versus placebo pill + sham hypnosis (PSH). Women recorded hot flash severity and frequency in a daily diary, in real time. The intrapatient difference in hot flash score (frequency × severity) at 8 weeks was analyzed using a General Estimating Equation model, using VSH as the referent arm, controlling for baseline hot flashes.
The active arms including PH or VH were not statistically significantly different than VSH (P = 0.34, P = 0.05, respectively). Women in each active arm reported hot flash reductions of about 50%, with the PSH group reporting a 25% reduction. Women receiving the PSH reported statistically significantly smaller reductions in hot flash score than women in the referent VSH arm (P = 0.001). There were no significant negative side effects during the course of the study.
Hypnosis alone reduced hot flashes equal to venlafaxine alone, but the combination of hypnosis and venlafaxine did not reduce hot flashes more than either treatment alone. More research is needed to clarify whether combining hypnosis with a different antidepressant would provide synergistic benefits.
对于潮热管理,持续需要有效的无不良副作用的非激素治疗方法。这项初步研究的主要目的是评估一种非激素药物与一种行为疗法联合使用对减少潮热的效果。
71名绝经后女性被随机分为四组之一:文拉法辛75毫克+催眠(VH)组、文拉法辛75毫克+假催眠(VSH)组、安慰剂片+催眠(PH)组、安慰剂片+假催眠(PSH)组。女性实时在每日日记中记录潮热的严重程度和频率。使用广义估计方程模型分析8周时潮热评分(频率×严重程度)的患者内差异,以VSH组作为对照臂,并控制基线潮热情况。
包括PH组或VH组在内的治疗组与VSH组相比,在统计学上无显著差异(分别为P = 0.34,P = 0.05)。每个治疗组的女性报告潮热减少约50%,而PSH组报告减少25%。接受PSH组的女性报告潮热评分的降低在统计学上显著小于对照VSH组的女性(P = 0.001)。在研究过程中没有明显的负面副作用。
单独使用催眠减少潮热的效果与单独使用文拉法辛相当,但催眠与文拉法辛联合使用在减少潮热方面并不比单独使用任何一种治疗方法更有效。需要更多的研究来阐明将催眠与不同的抗抑郁药联合使用是否会产生协同效益。