McLellan Deborah L, Williams Jessica A, Katz Jeffrey N, Pronk Nicolaas P, Wagner Gregory R, Cabán-Martinez Alberto J, Nelson Candace C, Sorensen Glorian
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Drs McLellan, Williams, Sorensen), Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts (Drs McLellan, Katz, Pronk, Wagner, Cabán-Martinez, Sorensen), University of Kansas, School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas (Dr Williams), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Katz), HealthPartners, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota (Dr Pronk), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH/CDC), Washington, District of Columbia (Dr Wagner), University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine Medical School, Miami, Florida (Dr Cabán-Martinez), and Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts (Ms Nelson).
J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Mar;59(3):289-294. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000949.
The aim of this study was to investigate relationships between worksite organizational characteristics (size, industrial sector, leadership commitment, and organizational supports) and integrated approaches to protecting and promoting worker health implemented in smaller enterprises.
We analyzed web-based survey data of Human Resource Managers at 114 smaller enterprises (<750 employees) to identify organizational factors associated with levels of integrated approaches among their worksites.
The companies' mean integration score was 13.6 (SD = 9.6) of a possible 44. In multivariate analyses, having a safety committee (P = 0.035) and top leadership support for health promotion (HP) (P = 0.004) were positively associated with higher integration scores.
Smaller enterprises in one U.S. region have relatively low levels of implementing integrated safety and promotion approaches. Having a safety committee and leadership support for HP may be important contributors to implementing integrated approaches in smaller enterprises.
本研究旨在调查工作场所组织特征(规模、工业部门、领导承诺和组织支持)与小企业实施的保护和促进工人健康的综合方法之间的关系。
我们分析了114家小企业(员工少于750人)的人力资源经理基于网络的调查数据,以确定与其工作场所综合方法水平相关的组织因素。
在满分44分的情况下,这些公司的平均综合得分是13.6分(标准差=9.6)。在多变量分析中,设有安全委员会(P=0.035)以及高层领导对健康促进的支持(P=0.004)与较高的综合得分呈正相关。
美国一个地区的小企业在实施安全与促进健康综合方法方面水平相对较低。设有安全委员会以及领导对健康促进的支持可能是小企业实施综合方法的重要因素。