• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心肌梗死后稳定期患者长期口服抗血小板治疗:来自稳定型冠状动脉疾病长期风险、临床管理及医疗资源利用(TIGRIS)观察性研究的见解

Longer-term oral antiplatelet use in stable post-myocardial infarction patients: Insights from the long Term rIsk, clinical manaGement and healthcare Resource utilization of stable coronary artery dISease (TIGRIS) observational study.

作者信息

Goodman Shaun G, Nicolau Jose C, Requena Gema, Maguire Andrew, Blankenberg Stefan, Chen Ji Yan, Granger Christopher B, Grieve Richard, Pocock Stuart J, Simon Tabassome, Yasuda Satoshi, Vega Ana Maria, Brieger David

机构信息

Terrence Donnelly Heart Centre, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2017 Jun 1;236:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.02.062. Epub 2017 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.02.062
PMID:28268087
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe contemporary patient characteristics and treatment patterns, including antithrombotic management, of post-myocardial infarction (MI) stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients at high atherothrombotic risk from different geographical regions.

METHODS

Patients ≥50years with prior MI 1-3years ago and ≥1 risk factor (age ≥65years, diabetes, 2nd prior MI >1yr ago, multivessel CAD, creatinine clearance 15-<60ml/min) were enrolled by 369 physicians (96% cardiologists) in 25 countries (2013-14) in the prospective TIGRIS study (NCT01866904).

RESULTS

9225 patients were enrolled (median 1.8years) post-MI: 52% with prior ST-elevation MI, median age 67years, 24% women, 67% Caucasian, 55% had ≥2 additional qualifying risk factors, 14% current smokers, 67% overweight/obese, 34% with blood pressure ≥140/90mmHg. 81% underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; 66% with drug-eluting stents) for the index MI. 75% of patients had been discharged on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT; acetylsalicylic acid [ASA]+ADP receptor inhibitor [ADPri]), mainly clopidogrel (75%). 63% had discontinued antiplatelet treatment (60% ADPri) around 1year, most commonly by physician recommendation (90%). At enrolment, 97% were taking an antithrombotic drug, most commonly ASA (88%), with 27% on DAPT (median duration 1.6years); continued DAPT >1year was highest (39%) in Asia-Pacific and lowest (12%) in Europe.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite guideline recommendations, 1 in 4 post-MI patients did not receive DAPT for ~1year. In contrast to guideline recommendations supporting newer ADPris, clopidogrel was mainly prescribed. Prior to recent RCT data supporting DAPT >1year post-MI/PCI, >1 in 4 patients have continued on DAPT, though with substantial international variability.

摘要

目的

描述来自不同地理区域的具有高动脉粥样硬化血栓形成风险的心肌梗死(MI)后稳定型冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者的当代患者特征和治疗模式,包括抗栓治疗管理。

方法

在2013 - 2014年,来自25个国家的369名医生(96%为心脏病专家)纳入了前瞻性TIGRIS研究(NCT01866904)中年龄≥50岁、1 - 3年前有过心肌梗死且有≥1个危险因素(年龄≥65岁、糖尿病、1年多以前的第二次心肌梗死、多支冠状动脉疾病、肌酐清除率15 - <60ml/min)的患者。

结果

9225例患者在心肌梗死后入组(中位时间1.8年):52%有过ST段抬高型心肌梗死病史,中位年龄67岁,24%为女性,67%为白种人,55%有≥2个其他符合条件的危险因素,14%为当前吸烟者,67%超重/肥胖,34%血压≥140/90mmHg。81%因首次心肌梗死接受了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI;66%使用药物洗脱支架)。75%的患者出院时接受双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT;阿司匹林[ASA]+ADP受体抑制剂[ADPri]),主要是氯吡格雷(75%)。63%的患者在大约1年时停用了抗血小板治疗(60%停用ADP受体抑制剂),最常见的是根据医生建议(90%)。在入组时,97%的患者正在服用抗栓药物,最常见的是阿司匹林(88%),27%接受双联抗血小板治疗(中位持续时间1.6年);双联抗血小板治疗持续>1年的比例在亚太地区最高(39%),在欧洲最低(12%)。

结论

尽管有指南推荐,但四分之一的心肌梗死后患者在约1年时间内未接受双联抗血小板治疗。与支持使用更新的ADP受体抑制剂的指南推荐相反,氯吡格雷是主要的处方药物。在最近支持心肌梗死/经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双联抗血小板治疗>1年的随机对照试验数据之前,四分之一以上的患者持续接受双联抗血小板治疗,尽管存在显著的国际差异。

相似文献

1
Longer-term oral antiplatelet use in stable post-myocardial infarction patients: Insights from the long Term rIsk, clinical manaGement and healthcare Resource utilization of stable coronary artery dISease (TIGRIS) observational study.心肌梗死后稳定期患者长期口服抗血小板治疗:来自稳定型冠状动脉疾病长期风险、临床管理及医疗资源利用(TIGRIS)观察性研究的见解
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Jun 1;236:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.02.062. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
2
6- versus 24-month dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents in patients nonresistant to aspirin: the randomized, multicenter ITALIC trial.在对阿司匹林无抵抗的患者中植入药物洗脱支架后,6 个月与 24 个月双联抗血小板治疗的随机、多中心 ITALIC 试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Mar 3;65(8):777-786. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.11.008. Epub 2014 Nov 16.
3
Dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with a long coronary artery lesion over 30 mm: Determinants and impact on prognosis.30毫米以上长冠状动脉病变患者的双联抗血小板治疗:决定因素及对预后的影响
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Apr;108(4):235-43. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2014.11.004. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
4
Myocardial Infarction Risk After Discontinuation of Thienopyridine Therapy in the Randomized DAPT Study (Dual Antiplatelet Therapy).随机双抗血小板治疗(DAPT)研究中停用噻吩吡啶类药物治疗后的心肌梗死风险
Circulation. 2017 May 2;135(18):1720-1732. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024835. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
5
Risk of Early Adverse Events After Clopidogrel Discontinuation in Patients Undergoing Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: An Individual Participant Data Analysis.短期双联抗血小板治疗后停用氯吡格雷患者发生早期不良事件的风险:一项个体参与者数据分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Aug 28;10(16):1621-1630. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.001.
6
Adjunctive cilostazol versus double-dose clopidogrel after drug-eluting stent implantation: the HOST-ASSURE randomized trial (Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Stenosis-Safety & Effectiveness of Drug-Eluting Stents & Anti-platelet Regimen).支架置入术后联合西洛他唑与氯吡格雷双倍剂量治疗:HOST-ASSURE 随机试验(优化药物洗脱支架治疗策略以确保安全性和有效性及抗血小板方案的冠状动脉狭窄的协调性研究)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Sep;6(9):932-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.022.
7
Longitudinal treatment patterns with ADP receptor inhibitors after myocardial infarction: Insights from the Canadian Observational AntiPlatelet sTudy.心肌梗死后使用ADP受体抑制剂的纵向治疗模式:来自加拿大抗血小板观察性研究的见解。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Feb 1;228:459-464. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.240. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
8
Zotarolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stents in uncertain drug-eluting stent candidates.在不确定是否适合药物洗脱支架的患者中,使用佐他莫司洗脱支架与裸金属支架。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Mar 3;65(8):805-815. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.11.053.
9
Randomized Angiographic and Intravascular Ultrasound Comparison of Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy vs Triple-Antiplatelet Therapy to Reduce Neointimal Tissue Proliferation in Diabetic Patients.双抗血小板治疗与三联抗血小板治疗减少糖尿病患者新生内膜组织增殖的随机血管造影和血管内超声比较
J Invasive Cardiol. 2017 Mar;29(3):76-81.
10
Platelet reactivity and cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable coronary artery disease: the Stent Thrombosis In Belgium (STIB) trial.稳定性冠状动脉疾病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的血小板反应性与心血管事件:比利时支架血栓形成(STIB)试验
EuroIntervention. 2014 Jun;10(2):204-11. doi: 10.4244/EIJV10I2A34.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the long-term outcomes in chronic coronary syndrome patients with prior ST-segment and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: findings from the TIGRIS registry.比较有 ST 段抬高和非 ST 段抬高心肌梗死病史的慢性冠状动脉综合征患者的长期结局:来自 TIGRIS 登记研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 18;13(12):e070237. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070237.
2
Long-term outcomes among stable post-acute myocardial infarction patients living in rural versus urban areas: insights from the prospective, observational TIGRIS registry.稳定型急性心肌梗死后患者在农村与城市地区的长期预后比较:来自前瞻性、观察性 TIGRIS 注册研究的结果。
Open Heart. 2023 Aug;10(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002326.
3
Feasibility of Community Pharmacist-Initiated and Point-of-Care Genotype-Guided De-Escalation of Oral P2Y12 Inhibitors.
社区药师主导的基于基因型的即时降阶梯治疗口服 P2Y12 抑制剂的可行性。
Genes (Basel). 2023 Feb 25;14(3):578. doi: 10.3390/genes14030578.
4
Multimorbidity, functional impairment, and mortality in older patients stable after prior acute myocardial infarction: Insights from the TIGRIS registry.在先前急性心肌梗死后稳定的老年患者中,合并症、功能障碍和死亡率:来自 TIGRIS 登记研究的见解。
Clin Cardiol. 2022 Dec;45(12):1277-1286. doi: 10.1002/clc.23915. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
5
Outcomes and regional differences in practice in a worldwide coronary stent registry.全球冠状动脉支架注册研究中的结果和实践的地区差异。
Heart. 2022 Jul 27;108(16):1310-1318. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320116.
6
Atrial fibrillation and clinical outcomes 1 to 3 years after myocardial infarction.心房颤动和心肌梗死后 1 至 3 年的临床结局。
Open Heart. 2021 Dec;8(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001726.
7
Diabetes association with self-reported health, resource utilization, and prognosis post-myocardial infarction.糖尿病与心肌梗死后自我报告的健康状况、资源利用和预后的关系。
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Dec;43(12):1352-1361. doi: 10.1002/clc.23476. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
8
Long-term antithrombotic management patterns in Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome: 2-year observations from the EPICOR Asia study.亚洲急性冠脉综合征患者的长期抗血栓治疗模式:EPICOR Asia 研究的 2 年观察结果。
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Sep;43(9):999-1008. doi: 10.1002/clc.23400. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
9
Personalised Approaches to Improving the Effect of Anti-platelet Agents: Where Do We Stand?改善抗血小板药物疗效的个性化方法:我们目前的进展如何?
Eur Cardiol. 2019 Dec 18;14(3):179-180. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2019.14.3.GE1. eCollection 2019 Dec.
10
Predicting risk of cardiovascular events 1 to 3 years post-myocardial infarction using a global registry.利用全球注册中心预测心肌梗死后 1 至 3 年内发生心血管事件的风险。
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Jan;43(1):24-32. doi: 10.1002/clc.23283. Epub 2019 Nov 12.