• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球冠状动脉支架注册研究中的结果和实践的地区差异。

Outcomes and regional differences in practice in a worldwide coronary stent registry.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, University Hospitals Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Department of Cardiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Heart. 2022 Jul 27;108(16):1310-1318. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320116.

DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320116
PMID:35012960
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9340045/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to assess the performance of a new generation thin-strut sirolimus-eluting coronary stent with abluminal biodegradable polymer in an all comer population. The secondary objective was to detail differences in contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) practice worldwide.

METHODS

e-Ultimaster was an all-comer, prospective, global registry (NCT02188355) with independent event adjudication enrolling patients undergoing PCI with the study stent. The primary outcome measure was target lesion failure (TLF) at 1 year, defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction and clinically driven target lesion revascularisation. Data were stratified according to 4 geographical regions.

RESULTS

A total of 37 198 patients were enrolled (Europe 69.2%, Asia 17.8%, Africa/Middle East 6.6% and South America/Mexico 6.5%) and 1-year follow-up was available for 35 389 patients (95.1%). One-year TLF occurred in 3.2% of the patients, ranging from 2% (Africa/Middle East) to 4.1% (South America/Mexico). In patients with acute coronary syndrome, potent P2Y inhibitors were prescribed in 48% of patients at discharge, while at 1 year 72% were on any dual antiplatelet therapy. Lipid-lowering treatment was administered in 80.9% and 75.5% of patients at discharge and 1 year, respectively. Regional differences in the profile of the treated patients as well as in PCI practice were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

In this investigation with worldwide representation, contemporary PCI using a new generation thin-strut sirolimus-eluting coronary stent with abluminal biodegradable polymer was associated with low 1-year TLF across clinical presentations and continents. Suboptimal adherence to current recommendations around antiplatelet and lipid lowering treatments was detected.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是评估新一代带有可降解外膜的薄壁西罗莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架在所有患者人群中的表现。次要目的是详细介绍全球经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)实践中的差异。

方法

e-Ultimaster 是一项在所有患者中进行的前瞻性全球注册研究(NCT02188355),由独立的事件裁决机构进行,招募接受研究支架 PCI 的患者。主要终点是 1 年时的靶病变失败(TLF),定义为心脏死亡、靶血管心肌梗死和临床驱动的靶病变血运重建的复合终点。数据按 4 个地理区域进行分层。

结果

共纳入 37198 例患者(欧洲 69.2%,亚洲 17.8%,非洲/中东地区 6.6%,南美/墨西哥 6.5%),35389 例患者(95.1%)可获得 1 年随访。1 年时 TLF 发生率为 3.2%,范围为 2%(非洲/中东地区)至 4.1%(南美/墨西哥)。在急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,出院时 48%的患者使用了强效 P2Y12 抑制剂,而 1 年后,72%的患者接受了任何双联抗血小板治疗。出院时和 1 年后,分别有 80.9%和 75.5%的患者接受降脂治疗。报告了不同地区患者治疗情况和 PCI 实践的差异。

结论

在这项具有全球代表性的研究中,新一代带有可降解外膜的薄壁西罗莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架的当代 PCI 与各种临床表现和大陆的 1 年 TLF 发生率低相关。检测到抗血小板和降脂治疗的当前推荐方案的依从性欠佳。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9340045/f84bfe64107a/heartjnl-2021-320116f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9340045/461133f5a34c/heartjnl-2021-320116f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9340045/9be859f38eb4/heartjnl-2021-320116f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9340045/47f0a8be4f8e/heartjnl-2021-320116f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9340045/f84bfe64107a/heartjnl-2021-320116f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9340045/461133f5a34c/heartjnl-2021-320116f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9340045/9be859f38eb4/heartjnl-2021-320116f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9340045/47f0a8be4f8e/heartjnl-2021-320116f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9340045/f84bfe64107a/heartjnl-2021-320116f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Outcomes and regional differences in practice in a worldwide coronary stent registry.全球冠状动脉支架注册研究中的结果和实践的地区差异。
Heart. 2022 Jul 27;108(16):1310-1318. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320116.
2
Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (BIOSTEMI): a single-blind, prospective, randomised superiority trial.生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与耐久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的比较(BIOSTEMI):一项单盲、前瞻性、随机优效性试验。
Lancet. 2019 Oct 5;394(10205):1243-1253. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31877-X. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
3
Very thin strut biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents in allcomers with coronary artery disease (BIO-RESORT): a three-arm, randomised, non-inferiority trial.非常薄的支撑物可生物降解聚合物依维莫司洗脱和西罗莫司洗脱支架与全人群冠心病使用耐用聚合物佐他莫司洗脱支架(BIO-RESORT):一项三臂、随机、非劣效试验。
Lancet. 2016 Nov 26;388(10060):2607-2617. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31920-1. Epub 2016 Oct 30.
4
Ultrathin-strut, biodegradable-polymer, sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin-strut, durable-polymer, everolimus-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary revascularisation: 5-year outcomes of the BIOSCIENCE randomised trial.超薄支架、可生物降解聚合物、西罗莫司洗脱支架与薄支架、耐用聚合物、依维莫司洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉血运重建:BIOSCIENCE 随机试验 5 年结果。
Lancet. 2018 Sep 1;392(10149):737-746. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31715-X. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
5
Ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent for percutaneous coronary revascularisation (BIOSCIENCE): a randomised, single-blind, non-inferiority trial.超薄支架可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与耐用聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉血运重建(BIOSCIENCE):一项随机、单盲、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2014 Dec 13;384(9960):2111-22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61038-2. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
6
1-Year Clinical Outcomes of All-Comer Patients Treated With the Dual-Therapy COMBO Stent: Primary Results of the COMBO Collaboration.所有患者接受双联治疗 COMBO 支架治疗后的 1 年临床结果:COMBO 合作的主要结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct 8;11(19):1969-1978. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.04.038.
7
Ultrathin, Biodegradable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent vs Thin, Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent.超亲水性、可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与薄型、持久聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jul 11;15(13):1324-1334. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.05.028.
8
1-Year Clinical Outcomes of All Comers Treated With 2 Bioresorbable Polymer-Coated Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of the COMBO and Ultrathin-Strut Orsiro Stents.全人群患者接受 2 款生物可吸收聚合物涂层依维莫司洗脱支架治疗 1 年的临床结局:COMBO 和 Ultrathin-Strut Orsiro 支架倾向性评分匹配比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Apr 13;13(7):820-830. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.11.023.
9
Randomized Comparison of a Biodegradable Polymer Ultrathin Strut Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With a Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The SORT OUT VII Trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中可生物降解聚合物超薄支柱西罗莫司洗脱支架与可生物降解聚合物比伐卢定洗脱支架的随机对照比较:SORT OUT VII试验
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul;9(7). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003610.
10
Thin, Very Thin, or Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable or Durable Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents: 3-Year Outcomes of BIO-RESORT.薄、极薄或超薄支架,生物可降解或耐用聚合物涂层药物洗脱支架:BIO-RESORT 的 3 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 9;12(17):1650-1660. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.054. Epub 2019 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Early Invasive Strategy on Left Ventricular Function Recovery in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients in Pakistan.早期侵入性策略对巴基斯坦急性心肌梗死患者左心室功能恢复的影响。
Cureus. 2024 Aug 25;16(8):e67778. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67778. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Treatment of Ostial Right Coronary Artery Narrowings: Outcomes From the Multicenter Prospective e-ULTIMASTER Registry.右冠状动脉开口狭窄的治疗:多中心前瞻性e-ULTIMASTER注册研究的结果
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Feb 25;2(3):100604. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.100604. eCollection 2023 May-Jun.
3
Impact of the number of modifiable risk factors on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: An analysis from the e-Ultimaster registry.

本文引用的文献

1
Medical Treatment in Coronary Patients: Is there Still a Gender Gap? Results from European Society of Cardiology EUROASPIRE V Registry.冠心病患者的治疗:是否仍存在性别差距?来自欧洲心脏病学会 EUROASPIRE V 注册研究的结果。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2021 Aug;35(4):801-808. doi: 10.1007/s10557-020-07095-6. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
2
Regional variation in patients and outcomes in the GLOBAL LEADERS trial.全球领导者试验中患者及结局的地区差异
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Feb 1;324:30-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.09.039. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
3
Comparative Trends in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Japan and the United States, 2013 to 2017.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后可改变危险因素数量对临床结局的影响:来自e-Ultimaster注册研究的分析
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 Feb 26;51:101370. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101370. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
Predicting target lesion failure following percutaneous coronary intervention through machine learning risk assessment models.通过机器学习风险评估模型预测经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的靶病变失败情况。
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2023 Aug 31;4(6):433-443. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztad051. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Impact of multisite artery disease on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: an analysis from the e-Ultimaster registry.多部位动脉疾病对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后临床结局的影响:来自 e-Ultimaster 登记研究的分析。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2023 Jun 21;9(4):417-426. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcac043.
2013 至 2017 年日本与美国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的对比趋势。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Sep 15;76(11):1328-1340. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.037.
4
2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation.2020年欧洲心脏病学会非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南
Eur Heart J. 2021 Apr 7;42(14):1289-1367. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575.
5
Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease.稳定型冠心病的初始侵入性或保守治疗策略。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 9;382(15):1395-1407. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915922. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
6
Total and Cause-Specific Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Observations From the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease Registry.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的全因死亡率和特定病因死亡率:来自阿尔伯塔省冠心病注册结局评估项目的观察结果
CJC Open. 2019 Jun 8;1(4):182-189. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2019.05.003. eCollection 2019 Jul.
7
2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes.2019年欧洲心脏病学会慢性冠状动脉综合征诊断和管理指南
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):407-477. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425.
8
2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk.2019年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲动脉粥样硬化学会血脂异常管理指南:通过血脂修饰降低心血管风险
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 1;41(1):111-188. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455.
9
'Ten commandments' for the 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南的“十诫”
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):79-80. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy855.
10
Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome in Chinese Military Hospitals, 2011-2014: a retrospective observational study of a national registry.2011-2014 年中国军队医院急性冠脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项全国注册登记的回顾性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 24;8(10):e023133. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023133.