Suppr超能文献

住院脑卒中患者重复脑血管成像的效用

Utility of Repeat Cerebrovascular Imaging among Hospitalized Stroke Patients.

作者信息

Raza Syed Ali, Javalkar Vijay, Dehkharghani Seena, Kudrimoti Archana, Saindane Amit, Mullins Mark, Nahab Fadi

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017 Jul;26(7):1588-1593. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.02.029. Epub 2017 Mar 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the frequency and clinical utility of repeat cerebrovascular imaging with computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the head after contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) of the head in acute stroke patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All stroke patients admitted to 2 academic medical centers from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2014 were identified as part of prospective radiology database if they underwent CE-MRA of the head followed by subsequent CTA of the head within 7 days. Two vascular neurologists blinded to CTA results retrospectively reviewed medical records including documented indications for imaging studies and clinical changes in patients to determine necessity of CTA.

RESULTS

Of 1355 acute stroke patients who underwent CE-MRA of the head, 195 (14%) patients underwent subsequent CTA of the head within 7 days, including 33 patients with nondiagnostic CE-MRA because of motion artifact. Of the remaining 162 (12%) patients, 69 (43%) were considered to have an unnecessary CTA of the head. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified (1) absence of new neurologic examination changes [OR 7.29; 95% CI 1.92-27.63] and (2) same documented indication for both studies [OR 6.47; 95% CI 3.04-13.78] as significant predictors of an unnecessary CTA. Changes in clinical management after CTA were significantly more common in necessary CTAs compared with studies determined to be unnecessary (42% versus 7%, P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

The utility of repeat cerebrovascular imaging with CTA of the head following a diagnostic CE-MRA is low when there is no change in neurologic examination or when ordered for the same indication.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究旨在评估急性卒中患者头部对比增强磁共振血管造影(CE-MRA)后,重复进行头部计算机断层血管造影(CTA)的频率及临床应用价值。

材料与方法

2012年1月1日至2014年12月31日期间入住两家学术医疗中心的所有卒中患者,若在7天内先接受了头部CE-MRA,随后又接受了头部CTA,则被纳入前瞻性放射学数据库。两名对CTA结果不知情的血管神经科医生回顾性审查病历,包括影像学检查的记录指征和患者的临床变化,以确定CTA的必要性。

结果

在1355例接受头部CE-MRA的急性卒中患者中,195例(14%)在7天内接受了后续头部CTA,其中33例因运动伪影导致CE-MRA诊断不明确。在其余162例(12%)患者中,69例(43%)被认为进行头部CTA不必要。多变量逻辑回归分析确定:(1)神经系统检查无新变化[比值比(OR)7.29;95%置信区间(CI)1.92 - 27.63]以及(2)两项检查记录的指征相同[OR 6.47;95% CI 3.04 - 13.78]是不必要CTA的显著预测因素。与被判定为不必要的检查相比,必要CTA后临床管理的改变明显更为常见(42%对7%,P <.0001)。

结论

当神经系统检查无变化或因相同指征进行检查时,诊断性CE-MRA后重复进行头部CTA脑血管成像的应用价值较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验