Suppr超能文献

平板电脑和纸质文本的阅读速度与理解能力:来自阿拉伯语的证据。

Reading Rate and Comprehension for Text Presented on Tablet and Paper: Evidence from Arabic.

作者信息

Hermena Ehab W, Sheen Mercedes, AlJassmi Maryam, AlFalasi Khulood, AlMatroushi Maha, Jordan Timothy R

机构信息

Cognition and Neuroscience Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Zayed University Dubai, UAE.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 21;8:257. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00257. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

The effectiveness of tablet computers to supplement or replace paper-based text in everyday life has yet to be fully revealed. Previous investigations comparing reading performance using tablets and paper have, however, reported inconsistent results. Furthermore, the interpretability of some previous findings is limited by lack of experimental control over variables like text display conditions. In the current study, we investigated reading performance for text presented on tablet and paper. Crucially, the levels of luminance and contrast were matched precisely across tablet and paper. The study used Arabic text which differs substantially from the languages used previously to investigate effects of tablet and paper on reading, thus offering a distinctive test of the influence of these two media on reading performance. The results suggest that when text display conditions are well-matched, there is no reliable difference in reading performance between the two media. Also, neither the order of medium (reading from tablet or paper first), nor familiarity with using a tablet significantly influence reading performance. These results call into question previous suggestions that reading from tablets is linked to poorer reading performance, and demonstrate the benefits of controlling text display conditions. These findings are of interest to reading scientists and educators.

摘要

平板电脑在日常生活中补充或取代纸质文本的有效性尚未完全显现。然而,此前比较使用平板电脑和纸质材料阅读表现的研究报告结果并不一致。此外,一些先前研究结果的可解释性受到限制,因为缺乏对文本显示条件等变量的实验控制。在本研究中,我们调查了在平板电脑和纸质材料上呈现的文本的阅读表现。至关重要的是,平板电脑和纸质材料的亮度和对比度水平精确匹配。该研究使用的阿拉伯文本与之前用于研究平板电脑和纸质材料对阅读影响的语言有很大不同,因此为这两种媒介对阅读表现的影响提供了独特的测试。结果表明,当文本显示条件良好匹配时,两种媒介在阅读表现上没有可靠的差异。而且,阅读媒介的顺序(先从平板电脑还是纸质材料阅读)以及对使用平板电脑的熟悉程度都不会显著影响阅读表现。这些结果对之前认为从平板电脑阅读与较差阅读表现有关的观点提出了质疑,并证明了控制文本显示条件的益处。这些发现对阅读科学家和教育工作者来说很有意义。

相似文献

6
The Role of Short Vowels in Arabic Listening Comprehension.短元音在阿拉伯语听力理解中的作用
J Psycholinguist Res. 2019 Jun;48(3):699-712. doi: 10.1007/s10936-018-09626-7.
9
Interruptions disrupt reading comprehension.打断会干扰阅读理解。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Jun;144(3):704-9. doi: 10.1037/xge0000074. Epub 2015 Apr 13.

本文引用的文献

2
Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results.贝叶斯推断在不显著结果中的应用。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 29;5:781. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781. eCollection 2014.
10
Luminance and spatial attention effects on early visual processing.亮度和空间注意力对早期视觉处理的影响。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1995 Jul;2(3):189-205. doi: 10.1016/0926-6410(95)90008-x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验