Willén A, Junestedt C, Rodhe L, Pell M, Jönsson H
Department of Energy and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7032, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden E-mail:
Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Box 210 60, SE-100 31 Stockholm, Sweden.
Water Sci Technol. 2017 Mar;75(5-6):1034-1050. doi: 10.2166/wst.2016.584.
Sewage sludge (SS) contains beneficial plant nutrients and organic matter, and therefore application of SS on agricultural land helps close nutrient loops. However, spreading operations are restricted to certain seasons and hence the SS needs to be stored. Storage and land application of SS are both potential sources of greenhouse gases and ammonia, leading to global warming, acidification and eutrophication. Covering the stored SS, treating it with urea and choosing the correct time for land application all have the potential to reduce emissions from the system. Using life cycle assessment (LCA), this study compares storage and land application options of SS in terms of global warming potential (GWP), acidification potential, eutrophication potential and primary energy use. The system with covered storage has the lowest impact of all categories. Systems with autumn application are preferable to spring application for all impact categories but, when nitrate leaching is considered, spring application is preferable in terms of eutrophication and primary energy use and, for some SS treatments, GWP. Ammonia addition reduces nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions during storage, but increases these emissions after land application. Storage duration has a large impact on GWP, while amount of chemical nitrogen fertiliser substituted has a large impact on primary energy use.
污水污泥含有对植物有益的养分和有机物,因此将污水污泥施用于农田有助于封闭养分循环。然而,污泥撒施作业仅限于特定季节,因此污水污泥需要储存。污水污泥的储存和土地施用都是温室气体和氨的潜在排放源,会导致全球变暖、酸化和富营养化。覆盖储存的污水污泥、用尿素处理以及选择正确的土地施用时间都有可能减少系统的排放。本研究采用生命周期评估(LCA)方法,从全球变暖潜势(GWP)、酸化潜势、富营养化潜势和一次能源使用等方面比较了污水污泥的储存和土地施用方案。覆盖储存系统在所有类别中的影响最小。对于所有影响类别而言,秋季施用的系统优于春季施用的系统,但考虑硝酸盐淋失时,就富营养化和一次能源使用而言,春季施用更优,对于某些污水污泥处理方式,就全球变暖潜势而言也是如此。添加氨可减少储存期间的一氧化二氮和氨排放,但会增加土地施用后的这些排放。储存持续时间对全球变暖潜势有很大影响,而替代化学氮肥的量对一次能源使用有很大影响。