Suppr超能文献

客观测量的坐姿和站姿与腰痛强度的关联:对建筑工人和医护人员的6个月随访

Associations of objectively measured sitting and standing with low-back pain intensity: a 6-month follow-up of construction and healthcare workers.

作者信息

Lunde Lars-Kristian, Koch Markus, Knardahl Stein, Veiersted Kaj Bo

机构信息

National Institute of Occupational Health, Gydas vei 8, 0336 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Scand J Work Environ Health. 2017 May 1;43(3):269-278. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3628. Epub 2017 Mar 8.

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to determine the associations between objectively measured sitting and standing duration and intensity of low-back pain (LBP) among Norwegian construction and healthcare workers. Methods One-hundred and twenty-four workers wore two accelerometers for 3-4 consecutive days, during work and leisure. Minutes of sitting and standing was calculated from accelerometer data. We obtained self-reported LBP intensity (0-3) at the time of objective measurement and after six months. We examined associations with linear mixed models and presented results per 100 minutes. Results For healthcare workers, the duration of sitting during work [β= -0.33, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) -0.55- -0.10] and during full-day (work + leisure) (β= -0.21, 95% CI -0.38- -0.04) was associated with baseline LBP intensity. Furthermore, minutes of sitting at work (β=-0.35, 95% CI -0.57- -0.13) and during the full day (β=-0.20, 95% CI -0.37- -0.04) were significantly associated with LBP intensity at six months. Associations were attenuated when adjusting for work-related mechanical and psychosocial covariates and objectively measured exposure during leisure time. No significant associations between sitting and LBP intensity were found for construction workers. Standing at work was not consistently associated with LBP intensity at baseline or after six months for any work sector. Conclusions This study suggests that a long duration of sitting at work is associated with lower levels of LBP intensity among healthcare workers. Standing duration had no consistent associations with LBP intensity.

摘要

目的 本研究旨在确定挪威建筑工人和医护人员中,客观测量的坐姿和站姿时长与下背痛(LBP)强度之间的关联。方法 124名工人在工作和休闲期间连续3至4天佩戴两个加速度计。根据加速度计数据计算坐姿和站姿的分钟数。我们在客观测量时以及六个月后获取了自我报告的LBP强度(0 - 3级)。我们使用线性混合模型检验关联,并每100分钟呈现结果。结果 对于医护人员,工作期间的坐姿时长[β = -0.33,95%置信区间(95%CI)-0.55 - -0.10]以及全天(工作 + 休闲)的坐姿时长(β = -0.21,95%CI -0.38 - -0.04)与基线LBP强度相关。此外,工作时的坐姿分钟数(β = -0.35,95%CI -0.57 - -0.13)和全天的坐姿分钟数(β = -0.20,95%CI -0.37 - -0.04)与六个月时的LBP强度显著相关。在调整与工作相关的机械和社会心理协变量以及休闲时间的客观测量暴露后,关联减弱。对于建筑工人,未发现坐姿与LBP强度之间存在显著关联。在任何工作部门,工作时的站姿在基线或六个月后均与LBP强度无一致关联。结论 本研究表明,工作时长时间坐着与医护人员较低水平的LBP强度相关。站姿时长与LBP强度无一致关联。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验