Suppr超能文献

工作中客观测量的坐姿与腰痛有关吗?DPhacto 队列的横断面研究。

Is objectively measured sitting at work associated with low-back pain? A cross sectional study in the DPhacto cohort.

机构信息

National Research Centre for the Working Environment (NRCWE), Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jan 1;44(1):96-105. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3680. Epub 2017 Oct 27.

Abstract

Objectives Low-back pain (LBP) is a substantial health challenge due to the risk for long-term sickness absence and early retirement. Several biomechanical exposures at work, including sitting, have been suggested to increase the risk for LBP. The objectives of this study were to determine (i) the extent to which temporal patterns and total amount of objectively measured sitting is associated with LBP intensity and (ii) whether selected modifiers influence these associations. Methods This cross sectional study uses baseline data from the Danish PHysical ACTivity cohort with Objective measurements (DPhacto) of physical activities in the cleaning, transport and manufacturing sectors. Peak intensity of LBP was collected by questionnaire on a 0-10 scale and sitting was expressed in terms of total duration and temporal pattern, ie, time spent in brief bursts (≤5 minutes), moderate periods (>5-≤20 minutes), and prolonged periods of sitting (>20 minutes); both during work and whole day (waking hours only). Associations were determined using linear regression in models accounting for moderation and confounding. Factors evaluated as moderators or confounders were assessed by questionnaire. Results The population consisted of 704 participants. No significant associations were found between total duration or temporal patterns of sitting and LBP intensity, neither during work nor for the whole day. Body mass index (BMI) significantly moderated the association between sitting and LBP; participants with a high and low BMI showing a negative and positive association, respectively. Conclusion Sitting was not independently associated with peak LBP intensity, suggesting other exposures are more powerful risk factors for LBP.

摘要

目的

下背痛(LBP)是一个严重的健康挑战,因为它存在长期病假和提前退休的风险。一些工作中的生物力学暴露,包括坐姿,已被认为会增加 LBP 的风险。本研究的目的是确定(i)客观测量的坐姿的时间模式和总时间与 LBP 强度的关联程度,以及(ii)是否有特定的修饰因素影响这些关联。

方法

这是一项横断面研究,使用丹麦物理活动队列与客观测量(DPhacto)的清洁、运输和制造部门的体力活动的基线数据。LBP 强度的峰值通过问卷在 0-10 刻度上收集,坐姿以总持续时间和时间模式表示,即短时间(≤5 分钟)、中等时间(>5-≤20 分钟)和长时间(>20 分钟)坐着的时间;既包括工作时间,也包括全天(仅清醒时间)。使用线性回归模型,考虑到修饰和混杂因素,确定了这些关联。通过问卷评估被评估为修饰或混杂因素的因素。

结果

该人群由 704 名参与者组成。在工作和全天(仅清醒时间)中,坐姿的总时间或时间模式与 LBP 强度之间均无显著关联。体重指数(BMI)显著修饰了坐姿与 LBP 之间的关联;高 BMI 和低 BMI 的参与者分别显示出负相关和正相关。

结论

坐姿与 LBP 的峰值强度没有独立关联,这表明其他暴露因素是 LBP 的更有力的危险因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验