Suppr超能文献

大学生的昼夜节律类型、上课时间与学业成绩

Chronotype, class times, and academic achievement of university students.

作者信息

Enright Tristan, Refinetti Roberto

机构信息

a Circadian Rhythm Laboratory, Department of Psychological Science , Boise State University , Boise , ID , USA.

出版信息

Chronobiol Int. 2017;34(4):445-450. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2017.1281287. Epub 2017 Mar 8.

Abstract

Numerous studies over the years have documented an effect of human chronotypes on physiological and psychological processes. Studies evaluating the impact of an individual's chronotype on his/her academic achievement have indicated that morning chronotypes have an academic advantage over evening chronotypes. However, these studies did not account for the time of day in which the participants were being evaluated. The goal of the present study was to examine whether morning chronotypes do have an academic advantage over evening chronotypes when the time of day of classes and exams is taken into consideration. We obtained morningness-eveningness scores and course grades from 207 university students who took classes (and exams) at different times of the day. We confirmed that morning chronotypes attain better grades than evening chronotypes, although the association is weak (r = 0.02). The difference persisted even after the time of day of classes and exams was taken into consideration. This is probably due to the fact that evening chronotypes are generally more sleep deprived than morning chronotypes as a result of the early schedule of most schools, which can impair their performance both early and late in the day.

摘要

多年来,大量研究记录了人类昼夜节律类型对生理和心理过程的影响。评估个体昼夜节律类型对其学业成绩影响的研究表明,早起型的人在学业上比晚睡型的人更具优势。然而,这些研究没有考虑对参与者进行评估的时间。本研究的目的是在考虑上课和考试时间的情况下,检验早起型的人在学业上是否确实比晚睡型的人更具优势。我们从207名在一天中不同时间上课(和考试)的大学生那里获取了晨型-夜型得分和课程成绩。我们证实,早起型的人比晚睡型的人成绩更好,尽管这种关联很弱(r = 0.02)。即使考虑了上课和考试的时间,这种差异仍然存在。这可能是因为由于大多数学校的上课时间较早,晚睡型的人通常比早起型的人睡眠不足更多,这可能会影响他们在一天中早晚的表现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验