Jankowski Konrad S, Díaz-Morales Juan Francisco, Vollmer Christian
Department of Psychology, University of Warsaw, 00-183 Warsaw, Poland.
Department of Social Psychology, Work and Individual Differences, Faculty of Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, 28223 Madrid, Spain.
J Intell. 2023 Jan 11;11(1):13. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11010013.
Research suggests the existence of an association between chronotype and intellectual performance, but the nature of this link remains unclear. Studies conducted in a laboratory setting point to the (better performance at a person's preferred time of day) for fluid intelligence, but not for crystallized intelligence, whereas studies that have analyzed students' grades suggest that the effect exists for both. In the present study, we aimed to verify the synchrony effect by applying direct measures of crystallized intelligence, fluid intelligence, and subjective sleepiness-alertness in a sample of high school students during their morning or afternoon class. The results revealed a synchrony effect for crystallized, but not for fluid intelligence. During morning class, students with a morning chronotype performed better than evening chronotypes on a test of crystallized intelligence, whereas during afternoon class there was no difference between chronotypes. The association resulted from decreased performance during morning class in evening chronotypes that improved during afternoon class and constant performance in morning chronotypes. These effects were independent of sleepiness-alertness levels. The results suggest that individual differences between chronotypes may be important for tasks performed during morning classes, but not during afternoon ones, and that performance across school days may depend on time of day in evening chronotypes.
研究表明,昼夜节律类型与智力表现之间存在关联,但这种联系的本质尚不清楚。在实验室环境中进行的研究表明,(在个人偏好的一天中的时间表现更好)在流体智力方面成立,但在晶体智力方面不成立,而分析学生成绩的研究表明,两者都存在这种影响。在本研究中,我们旨在通过在高中生样本的上午或下午课堂上直接测量晶体智力、流体智力和主观困倦警觉性来验证同步效应。结果显示,晶体智力存在同步效应,但流体智力不存在。在上午的课程中,具有早晨昼夜节律类型的学生在晶体智力测试中的表现优于晚上昼夜节律类型的学生,而在下午的课程中,不同昼夜节律类型之间没有差异。这种关联是由于晚上昼夜节律类型的学生在上午课程中的表现下降,而在下午课程中有所改善,以及早晨昼夜节律类型的学生表现保持不变。这些影响与困倦警觉水平无关。结果表明,昼夜节律类型之间的个体差异可能对上午课程中的任务很重要,但对下午课程中的任务不重要,并且整个上学日的表现可能取决于晚上昼夜节律类型的一天中的时间。