Martin Jeanne Sophie, Gaudreault Michael M, Perron Michel, Laberge Luc
Department of Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology, Laval University, Québec, Québec, Canada Centre de recherche de l'Institut en santé mentale de Québec, Québec, Canada.
ÉCOBES-Recherche et transfert, Cégep de Jonquière, Saguenay, Québec, Canada.
J Biol Rhythms. 2016 Apr;31(2):205-17. doi: 10.1177/0748730415625510. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
Adolescent maturation is associated with delays of the endogenous circadian phase. Consequently, early school schedules may lead to a mismatch between internal and external time, which can be detrimental to adolescent sleep and health. In parallel, chronotype is known to play a role in adolescent health; evening chronotype adolescents are at higher risk for sleep problems and lower academic achievement. In the summer of 2008, Kénogami High School (Saguenay, Canada) was destroyed by fire. Kénogami students were subsequently relocated to Arvida High School (situated 5.3 km away) for the 2008-2009 academic year. A dual school schedule was implemented, with Arvida students attending a morning schedule (0740-1305 h) and Kénogami students an afternoon schedule (1325-1845 h). This study aimed to investigate the effects of such school schedules and chronotype on sleep, light exposure, and daytime functioning. Twenty-four morning and 33 afternoon schedule students wore an actigraph during 7 days to measure sleep and light exposure. Academic achievement was obtained from school. Subjects completed validated questionnaires on daytime sleepiness, psychological distress, social rhythms, school satisfaction, alcohol, and chronotype. Overall, afternoon schedule students had longer sleep duration, lower sleepiness, and lower light exposure than morning schedule students. Evening chronotypes (E-types) reported higher levels of sleepiness than morning chronotypes (M-types) in both morning and afternoon schedules. Furthermore, M-types attending the morning schedule reported higher sleepiness than M-types attending the afternoon schedule. No difference was found between morning and afternoon schedule students with regard to academic achievement, psychological distress, social rhythms, school satisfaction, and alcohol consumption. However, in both schedules, M-type had more regular social rhythms and lower alcohol consumption. In summary, this study emphasizes that an early school schedule is associated with detrimental effects in terms of sleep deprivation and daytime sleepiness, even for M-types. Furthermore, irrespective of school schedule, E-type adolescents face an increased risk for poor daytime functioning.
青少年成熟与内源性昼夜节律相位延迟有关。因此,早期的学校作息时间可能导致内部时间与外部时间不匹配,这可能对青少年的睡眠和健康有害。同时,已知昼夜节律类型在青少年健康中起作用;晚睡型青少年睡眠问题风险更高,学业成绩更低。2008年夏天,加拿大萨格奈市的凯诺加米高中被大火烧毁。随后,凯诺加米高中的学生在2008 - 2009学年被重新安置到距离5.3公里外的阿尔维达高中。实施了双轨学校作息制度,阿尔维达高中的学生采用上午作息时间(0740 - 1305时),凯诺加米高中的学生采用下午作息时间(1325 - 1845时)。本研究旨在调查这种学校作息时间和昼夜节律类型对睡眠、光照暴露和日间功能的影响。24名上午作息和33名下午作息的学生佩戴活动记录仪7天,以测量睡眠和光照暴露情况。学业成绩从学校获取。受试者完成了关于日间嗜睡、心理困扰、社交节律、学校满意度、饮酒情况和昼夜节律类型的有效问卷。总体而言,下午作息的学生比上午作息的学生睡眠时间更长、嗜睡程度更低、光照暴露更少。在上午和下午作息时间中,晚睡型(E型)学生报告的嗜睡程度均高于早起型(M型)学生。此外,上午作息的M型学生报告的嗜睡程度高于下午作息的M型学生。在学业成绩、心理困扰、社交节律、学校满意度和饮酒量方面,上午和下午作息的学生之间未发现差异。然而,在两种作息时间中,M型学生的社交节律更规律,饮酒量更低。总之,本研究强调,即使对于M型学生,早期的学校作息时间在睡眠剥夺和日间嗜睡方面也存在有害影响。此外,无论学校作息时间如何,E型青少年面临日间功能不良风险增加的问题。