From the Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule (RWTH) Aachen University, Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Aachen, Germany.
Anesthesiology. 2017 May;126(5):909-922. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001605.
One important explanation for the detrimental effects of conventional mechanical ventilation is the biotrauma hypothesis that ventilation may trigger proinflammatory responses that subsequently cause lung injury. This hypothesis has frequently been studied in so-called one-hit models (overventilation of healthy lungs) that so far have failed to establish an unequivocal link between inflammation and hypoxemic lung failure. This study was designed to develop a one-hit biotrauma model.
Mice (six per group) were ventilated for up to 7 h (positive end-expiratory pressure 2 cm H2O) and received 300 μl/h fluid support. Series_1: initial plateau pressures of 10, 24, 27, or 30 cm H2O. Series_2: ventilation with pressure release at 34 cm H2O and initial plateau pressure of 10, 24, 27, or 30 cm H2O. To study the significance of inflammation, the latter groups were also pretreated with the steroid dexamethasone.
Within 7 h, 20 of 24 mice ventilated with plateau pressure of 27 cm H2O or more died of a catastrophic lung failure characterized by strongly increased proinflammatory markers and a precipitous decrease in pulmonary compliance, blood pressure, and oxygenation. Pretreatment with dexamethasone reduced inflammation, but prolonged median survival time by 30 min.
Our findings demonstrate a sharp distinction between ventilation with 24 cm H2O that was well tolerated and ventilation with 27 cm H2O that was lethal for most animals due to catastrophic lung failure. In the former case, inflammation was benign and in the latter, a by-product that only accelerated lung failure. The authors suggest that biotrauma-when defined as a ventilation-induced and inflammation-dependent hypoxemia-is difficult to study in murine one-hit models of ventilation, at least not within 7 h. (Anesthesiology 2017; 126:909-22).
传统机械通气造成有害影响的一个重要解释是生物创伤假说,即通气可能引发促炎反应,随后导致肺损伤。该假说已在所谓的单次打击模型(健康肺过度通气)中进行了广泛研究,但迄今为止,尚未在炎症与低氧性肺衰竭之间建立明确的联系。本研究旨在建立单次打击生物创伤模型。
每组 6 只小鼠通气长达 7 小时(呼气末正压 2cmH2O),并接受 300μl/h 的液体支持。系列 1:初始平台压为 10、24、27 或 30cmH2O。系列 2:在压力释放为 34cmH2O 时进行通气,初始平台压为 10、24、27 或 30cmH2O。为了研究炎症的意义,后几组还用类固醇地塞米松进行预处理。
在 7 小时内,27cmH2O 或更高平台压通气的 24 只小鼠中有 20 只死于灾难性肺衰竭,其特征为强烈增加的促炎标志物和肺顺应性、血压和氧合急剧下降。地塞米松预处理可减少炎症,但将中位存活时间延长 30 分钟。
我们的发现表明,24cmH2O 的通气可以很好地耐受,而 27cmH2O 的通气则会导致大多数动物因灾难性肺衰竭而致命,两者之间存在明显区别。在前一种情况下,炎症是良性的,在后一种情况下,炎症只是加速肺衰竭的一种副产物。作者认为,生物创伤——当定义为通气引起的、依赖炎症的低氧血症时——在至少 7 小时内,很难在小鼠单次打击通气模型中进行研究。(麻醉学 2017;126:909-22)