• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重返职场的员工:将职业发展文献扩展到包括“回巢”就业。

Employees on the rebound: Extending the careers literature to include boomerang employment.

机构信息

Scheller College of Business, Georgia Institute of Technology.

Department of Management, California State University, Chico.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2017 Jun;102(6):890-909. doi: 10.1037/apl0000200. Epub 2017 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1037/apl0000200
PMID:28277728
Abstract

As employee careers have evolved from linear trajectories confined within 1 organization to more dynamic and boundaryless paths, organizations and individuals alike have increasingly considered reestablishing prior employment relationships. These "boomerang employees" follow career paths that feature 2 or more temporally separated tenures in particular organizations ("boomerang organizations"). Yet, research to date is mute on how or to what extent differences across boomerang employees' career experiences, and the learning and knowledge developed at and away from boomerang organizations, meaningfully impact their performance following their return. Addressing this omission, we extend a careers-based learning perspective to construct a theoretical framework of a parsimonious, yet generalizable, set of factors that influence boomerang employee return performance. Results based on a sample of boomerang employees and employers in the same industry (professional basketball) indicate that intra- and extraorganizational knowledge construction and disruptions, as well as transition events, are significantly predictive of boomerangs' return performance. Comparisons with 2 matched samples of nonboomerang employees likewise suggest distinctive patterns in the performance of boomerang employees. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

随着员工职业轨迹从局限于单一组织内的线性发展演变为更具动态性和无界性的路径,组织和个人都越来越多地考虑重新建立之前的雇佣关系。这些“回巢员工”遵循职业轨迹,在特定组织中经历了 2 次或更多次时间上分开的任期(“回巢组织”)。然而,迄今为止的研究对于回巢员工的职业经历差异,以及在回巢组织内外获得的学习和知识如何以及在何种程度上对他们返回后的表现产生有意义的影响,仍然没有定论。为了解决这一遗漏,我们扩展了基于职业的学习视角,构建了一个理论框架,该框架包含了一组简化但具有普遍性的因素,这些因素影响着回巢员工的返回绩效。基于同一行业(职业篮球)的回巢员工和雇主的样本的结果表明,组织内和组织间的知识构建和中断,以及过渡事件,对回巢者的返回绩效有显著的预测作用。与 2 个匹配的非回巢员工样本的比较也同样表明了回巢员工绩效的独特模式。

相似文献

1
Employees on the rebound: Extending the careers literature to include boomerang employment.重返职场的员工:将职业发展文献扩展到包括“回巢”就业。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Jun;102(6):890-909. doi: 10.1037/apl0000200. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
2
Employers' and employees' views on responsibilities for career management in nursing: a cross-sectional survey.雇主与雇员对护理职业管理责任的看法:一项横断面调查。
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Jan;71(1):78-89. doi: 10.1111/jan.12473. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
3
[Return to Work Strategies of Employees who Experienced Depression: Employers and HR's Perspectives].[经历过抑郁症的员工的重返工作岗位策略:雇主和人力资源部门的观点]
Sante Ment Que. 2017 Fall;42(2):173-196.
4
Multisource feedback, human capital, and the financial performance of organizations.多源反馈、人力资本与组织财务绩效。
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Nov;101(11):1569-1584. doi: 10.1037/apl0000125. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
5
The Generative Mechanism of Boomerang Intention: From the Perspective of Legacy Identification.回旋镖意图的生成机制:基于遗产识别的视角
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 24;12:807887. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.807887. eCollection 2021.
6
How policy on employee involvement in work reintegration can yield its opposite: employee experiences in a Canadian setting.员工参与工作再融入政策如何产生相反的效果:加拿大的员工经验。
Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Apr;35(7):527-37. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.704123. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
7
Get that next job-how to break out of the postdoc trap.获得下一份工作——如何摆脱博士后困境。
Mol Biol Cell. 2015 Nov 1;26(21):3700-3. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E15-05-0264.
8
Analysis of factors affecting employee satisfaction: A case study from Pakistan.影响员工满意度的因素分析:来自巴基斯坦的案例研究。
Work. 2015;52(1):137-52. doi: 10.3233/WOR-152039.
9
Boomerang academics: why we left academia for industry, but then came back.回旋镖学者:我们为何离开学术界投身行业,但后来又回来了。
Nature. 2023 Sep;621(7980):S99-S101. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-03000-x.
10
Human resource management and unit performance in knowledge-intensive work.知识密集型工作中的人力资源管理与单位绩效。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Aug;102(8):1222-1236. doi: 10.1037/apl0000216. Epub 2017 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The Generative Mechanism of Boomerang Intention: From the Perspective of Legacy Identification.回旋镖意图的生成机制:基于遗产识别的视角
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 24;12:807887. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.807887. eCollection 2021.