• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 FRAIL 量表进行虚弱筛查:与表型标准的比较。

Screening for Frailty With the FRAIL Scale: A Comparison With the Phenotype Criteria.

机构信息

Division of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil; Institute and Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, USP, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine of Jundiaí, Jundiaí, Brazil.

Institute and Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, USP, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jul 1;18(7):592-596. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2017.01.009
PMID:28279607
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reliable and valid frailty screening instruments are lacking. The aim of the present study was to compare the diagnostic properties of the FRAIL-BR with Fried's frailty phenotype (CHS), which has not been done.

METHODS

Cross-sectional observational study of 124 older adults aged 60 or older from 2 university-based geriatric outpatient units in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. In ROC analyses, we evaluated different cutoff points and AUC areas of the FRAIL-BR compared with the CHS criteria. Also, components of both diagnostic strategies had head-to-head comparisons whenever possible.

RESULTS

The sample was composed mostly of overweight (mean BMI = 29.5 kg/m) women (83%) with mean age of 78.6 (±7.1) years. Prevalence of frailty varied according to the FRAIL-BR (23.3%) and the CHS criteria (14.5%) (P = .04). A cutoff of 3 points in the FRAIL-BR presented a sensitivity of 28% and specificity of 90% (P = .049). A cutoff of 2 points resulted in a sensitivity of 54% and specificity of 73% (P = .01). Comparisons of 4 FRAIL-BR items (ie, weight loss, aerobic capacity, fatigue, and physical resistance) to the respective CHS components showed an independent diagnostic property of all measures, with the exception for weight loss.

CONCLUSION

The FRAIL scale can be used as a screening instrument for frailty (time and cost-effective).

摘要

背景

目前缺乏可靠且有效的衰弱筛查工具。本研究旨在比较 FRAIL-BR 与 Fried 衰弱表型(CHS)的诊断特性,而这在以前尚未进行过。

方法

这是一项在巴西圣保罗州 2 所大学老年门诊单位的 124 名 60 岁及以上老年人中进行的横断面观察性研究。在 ROC 分析中,我们评估了 FRAIL-BR 与 CHS 标准相比的不同截断点和 AUC 面积。此外,只要有可能,两种诊断策略的组成部分都进行了直接比较。

结果

该样本主要由超重(平均 BMI 为 29.5 kg/m)的女性(83%)组成,平均年龄为 78.6(±7.1)岁。根据 FRAIL-BR(23.3%)和 CHS 标准(14.5%),衰弱的患病率有所不同(P=0.04)。FRAIL-BR 的截断值为 3 分时,灵敏度为 28%,特异性为 90%(P=0.049)。截断值为 2 分时,灵敏度为 54%,特异性为 73%(P=0.01)。对 FRAIL-BR 的 4 项指标(即体重减轻、有氧运动能力、疲劳和身体抵抗力)与相应的 CHS 成分进行比较显示,除体重减轻外,所有指标均具有独立的诊断特性。

结论

FRAIL 量表可作为一种用于筛查衰弱的工具(省时且具有成本效益)。

相似文献

1
Screening for Frailty With the FRAIL Scale: A Comparison With the Phenotype Criteria.使用 FRAIL 量表进行虚弱筛查:与表型标准的比较。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jul 1;18(7):592-596. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
2
Feasibility and Factor Structure of the FRAIL Scale in Older Adults.衰弱量表在老年人中的可行性和因子结构。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;18(4):367.e11-367.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.12.067. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
3
Measuring frailty in clinical practice: a comparison of physical frailty assessment methods in a geriatric out-patient clinic.临床实践中的衰弱评估:老年门诊中不同身体衰弱评估方法的比较。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Nov 13;17(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0623-0.
4
Peak Expiratory Flow as an Index of Frailty Syndrome in Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.呼气峰值流量作为老年人衰弱综合征的指标:一项横断面研究。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2020;24(9):993-998. doi: 10.1007/s12603-020-1423-3.
5
Prevalence of frailty and its association with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and resource utilization in a population of Singaporean older adults.在新加坡老年人群体中,衰弱的流行情况及其与社会人口学和临床特征的关系,以及与资源利用的关系。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Oct;17(10):1444-1454. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12891. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
6
German translation, cross-cultural adaptation and diagnostic test accuracy of three frailty screening tools : PRISMA-7, FRAIL scale and Groningen Frailty Indicator.三种衰弱筛查工具的德语翻译、跨文化调适及诊断测试准确性:PRISMA-7、衰弱量表和格罗宁根衰弱指标
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Apr;51(3):282-292. doi: 10.1007/s00391-017-1295-2. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
7
Assessment of vulnerable older adults' physical function according to the Japanese Long-Term Care Insurance (LTCI) system and Fried's criteria for frailty syndrome.根据日本长期护理保险(LTCI)系统和 Fried 衰弱综合征标准评估脆弱老年人的身体功能。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012 Sep-Oct;55(2):385-91. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2011.10.004. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
8
Assessment of frailty in Saudi community-dwelling older adults: validation of measurements.沙特社区居住老年人的衰弱评估:测量方法的验证
Ann Saudi Med. 2019 May-Jun;39(3):197-204. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2019.197. Epub 2019 May 30.
9
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Short Physical Performance Battery for Detecting Frailty in Older People.简易体能测试对于检测老年人虚弱的诊断准确性。
Phys Ther. 2020 Jan 23;100(1):90-98. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzz154.
10
Screening for frailty in older adults using a self-reported instrument.使用自我报告工具对老年人进行衰弱筛查。
Rev Saude Publica. 2015;49:2. doi: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2015049005516. Epub 2015 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a risk identification model for frailty in stroke survivors: new evidence from CHARLS.中风幸存者衰弱风险识别模型的开发与验证:来自中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS)的新证据
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 27;25(1):2939. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24198-7.
2
Association between Life's Essential 8 and frailty among the United States older people.美国老年人生命必需的八项要素与衰弱之间的关联。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 16;13:1554687. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1554687. eCollection 2025.
3
Predictive value of preoperative frailty combined with Controlling Nutritional Status score for postoperative lung infection in breast cancer patients.
术前衰弱联合控制营养状况评分对乳腺癌患者术后肺部感染的预测价值
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 4;104(27):e43037. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043037.
4
Unsupervised Frailty Intervention by Digitalized Exercise Coaching: A Feasibility Study.数字化运动指导的无监督衰弱干预:一项可行性研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jun 12;25(12):3674. doi: 10.3390/s25123674.
5
Frailty risk prediction models in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from China.维持性血液透析患者衰弱风险预测模型:来自中国研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Ren Fail. 2025 Dec;47(1):2500663. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2025.2500663. Epub 2025 May 26.
6
Prediction model for delirium in advanced cancer patients receiving palliative care: development and validation.接受姑息治疗的晚期癌症患者谵妄预测模型:开发与验证
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Feb 13;24(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01683-9.
7
Association between frailty, as measured by the FRAIL scale, and 1-year mortality in older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.通过FRAIL量表测量的衰弱与接受髋部骨折手术的老年患者1年死亡率之间的关联。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jan 30;25(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05716-z.
8
External Validation of the Walter Index for Posthospitalization Mortality Prediction in Older Adults.老年人住院后死亡率预测的沃尔特指数的外部验证
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2455475. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.55475.
9
Scale-based screening and assessment of age-related frailty.基于量表的与年龄相关的衰弱筛查和评估。
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 18;12:1424613. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1424613. eCollection 2024.
10
Frailty over the rainbow: a cross-sectional study of LGBT+ adults aged over 50 years.彩虹之上的衰弱:一项针对50岁以上LGBT+成年人的横断面研究。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2024 Dec 16;22:eAO0937. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0937. eCollection 2024.