Kosek Eva, Rosen Annelie, Carville Serena, Choy Ernest, Gracely Richard H, Marcus Hanke, Petzke Frank, Ingvar Martin, Jensen Karin B
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Stockholm Spine Center, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Pain. 2017 Jul;18(7):835-843. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.02.434. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
Knowledge about placebo mechanisms in patients with chronic pain is scarce. Fibromyalgia syndrome (FM) is associated with dysfunctions of central pain inhibition, and because placebo analgesia entails activation of endogenous pain inhibition, we hypothesized that long-term exposure to FM pain would negatively affect placebo responses. In our study we examined the placebo group (n = 37, mean age 45 years) from a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigating the effects of milnacipran or placebo. Twenty-two patients were classified as placebo nonresponders and 15 as responders, according to the Patient Global Impression of Change scale. Primary outcome was the change in pressure pain sensitivity from baseline to post-treatment. Secondary outcomes included ratings of clinical pain (visual analog scale), FM effect (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire), and pain drawing. Among placebo responders, longer FM duration was associated with smaller reductions in pressure pain sensitivity (r = .689, P = .004), but not among nonresponders (r = -.348, P = .112). In our study we showed that FM duration influences endogenous pain regulation, because pain levels and placebo-induced analgesia were negatively affected. Our results point to the importance of early FM interventions, because endogenous pain regulation may still be harnessed at that early time. Also, placebo-controlled trials should take FM duration into consideration when interpreting results.
This study presents a novel perspective on placebo analgesia, because placebo responses among patients with chronic pain were analyzed. Long-term exposure to fibromyalgia pain was associated with lower placebo analgesia, and the results show the importance of taking pain duration into account when interpreting the results from placebo-controlled trials.
关于慢性疼痛患者的安慰剂机制的知识匮乏。纤维肌痛综合征(FM)与中枢性疼痛抑制功能障碍有关,由于安慰剂镇痛需要激活内源性疼痛抑制,我们推测长期暴露于FM疼痛会对安慰剂反应产生负面影响。在我们的研究中,我们检查了一项为期12周的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验中的安慰剂组(n = 37,平均年龄45岁),该试验研究了米那普明或安慰剂的效果。根据患者总体变化印象量表,22名患者被分类为安慰剂无反应者,15名患者为反应者。主要结局是从基线到治疗后的压力疼痛敏感性变化。次要结局包括临床疼痛评分(视觉模拟量表)、FM效应(纤维肌痛影响问卷)和疼痛绘图。在安慰剂反应者中,FM持续时间越长,压力疼痛敏感性降低越小(r = 0.689,P = 0.004),但在无反应者中并非如此(r = -0.348,P = 0.112)。在我们的研究中,我们表明FM持续时间会影响内源性疼痛调节,因为疼痛水平和安慰剂诱导的镇痛受到负面影响。我们的结果指出了早期FM干预的重要性,因为在早期仍可利用内源性疼痛调节。此外,安慰剂对照试验在解释结果时应考虑FM持续时间。
这项研究提出了关于安慰剂镇痛的新观点,因为分析了慢性疼痛患者的安慰剂反应。长期暴露于纤维肌痛疼痛与较低的安慰剂镇痛相关,结果表明在解释安慰剂对照试验结果时考虑疼痛持续时间的重要性。