• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护病房简化死亡率评分(SMS-ICU):床边临床预测规则的制定与验证方案

Simplified Mortality Score for the Intensive Care Unit (SMS-ICU): protocol for the development and validation of a bedside clinical prediction rule.

作者信息

Granholm Anders, Perner Anders, Krag Mette, Hjortrup Peter Buhl, Haase Nicolai, Holst Lars Broksø, Marker Søren, Collet Marie Oxenbøll, Jensen Aksel Karl Georg, Møller Morten Hylander

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Centre for Research in Intensive Care, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 9;7(3):e015339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015339.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015339
PMID:28279999
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5353313/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Mortality prediction scores are widely used in intensive care units (ICUs) and in research, but their predictive value deteriorates as scores age. Existing mortality prediction scores are imprecise and complex, which increases the risk of missing data and decreases the applicability bedside in daily clinical practice. We propose the development and validation of a new, simple and updated clinical prediction rule: the Simplified Mortality Score for use in the Intensive Care Unit (SMS-ICU).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

During the first phase of the study, we will develop and internally validate a clinical prediction rule that predicts 90-day mortality on ICU admission. The development sample will comprise 4247 adult critically ill patients acutely admitted to the ICU, enrolled in 5 contemporary high-quality ICU studies/trials. The score will be developed using binary logistic regression analysis with backward stepwise elimination of candidate variables, and subsequently be converted into a point-based clinical prediction rule. The general performance, discrimination and calibration of the score will be evaluated, and the score will be internally validated using bootstrapping. During the second phase of the study, the score will be externally validated in a fully independent sample consisting of 3350 patients included in the ongoing Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in the Intensive Care Unit trial. We will compare the performance of the SMS-ICU to that of existing scores.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

We will use data from patients enrolled in studies/trials already approved by the relevant ethical committees and this study requires no further permissions. The results will be reported in accordance with the Transparent Reporting of multivariate prediction models for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) statement, and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal.

摘要

引言

死亡率预测评分在重症监护病房(ICU)和研究中被广泛应用,但随着评分时间的推移,其预测价值会下降。现有的死亡率预测评分不精确且复杂,这增加了数据缺失的风险,并降低了在日常临床实践中的床边适用性。我们提议开发并验证一种新的、简单且更新的临床预测规则:用于重症监护病房的简化死亡率评分(SMS-ICU)。

方法与分析

在研究的第一阶段,我们将开发并进行内部验证一种临床预测规则,该规则可预测ICU入院时的90天死亡率。开发样本将包括4247名急性入住ICU的成年危重症患者,这些患者来自5项当代高质量的ICU研究/试验。该评分将使用二元逻辑回归分析并通过向后逐步排除候选变量来开发,随后转换为基于点数的临床预测规则。将评估该评分的总体性能、区分度和校准度,并使用自抽样法进行内部验证。在研究的第二阶段,该评分将在一个完全独立的样本中进行外部验证,该样本由正在进行的ICU应激性溃疡预防试验中纳入的3350名患者组成。我们将比较SMS-ICU与现有评分的性能。

伦理与传播

我们将使用已获相关伦理委员会批准的研究/试验中患者的数据,本研究无需进一步的许可。结果将按照个体预后或诊断多变量预测模型的透明报告(TRIPOD)声明进行报告,并提交给同行评审期刊。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b675/5353313/7f43d95e2ccb/bmjopen2016015339f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b675/5353313/7f43d95e2ccb/bmjopen2016015339f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b675/5353313/7f43d95e2ccb/bmjopen2016015339f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Simplified Mortality Score for the Intensive Care Unit (SMS-ICU): protocol for the development and validation of a bedside clinical prediction rule.重症监护病房简化死亡率评分(SMS-ICU):床边临床预测规则的制定与验证方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 9;7(3):e015339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015339.
2
Development and internal validation of the Simplified Mortality Score for the Intensive Care Unit (SMS-ICU).重症监护病房简化死亡率评分(SMS-ICU)的开发与内部验证。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Mar;62(3):336-346. doi: 10.1111/aas.13048. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
3
External validation of the Simplified Mortality Score for the Intensive Care Unit (SMS-ICU).简化重症监护病房死亡率评分(SMS-ICU)的外部验证。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 Oct;63(9):1216-1224. doi: 10.1111/aas.13422. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
4
Customization and external validation of the Simplified Mortality Score for the Intensive Care Unit (SMS-ICU) in Brazilian critically ill patients.巴西危重症患者重症监护病房简化死亡率评分(SMS-ICU)的定制和外部验证。
J Crit Care. 2020 Oct;59:94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.05.016. Epub 2020 May 29.
5
A novel mortality prediction model for the current population in an adult intensive care unit.一种针对成人重症监护病房当前患者群体的新型死亡率预测模型。
Heart Lung. 2018 Jan-Feb;47(1):10-15. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2017.10.009.
6
Predicting Mortality in Low-Income Country ICUs: The Rwanda Mortality Probability Model (R-MPM).预测低收入国家重症监护病房的死亡率:卢旺达死亡率概率模型(R-MPM)。
PLoS One. 2016 May 19;11(5):e0155858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155858. eCollection 2016.
7
Performance of the Obstetric Early Warning Score in critically ill patients for the prediction of maternal death.产科早期预警评分在危重症患者中预测孕产妇死亡的效能
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan;216(1):58.e1-58.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.103. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
8
The Challenge of Predicting Pressure Ulcers in Critically Ill Patients. A Multicenter Cohort Study.预测危重症患者压疮的挑战。一项多中心队列研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Oct;13(10):1775-1783. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201603-154OC.
9
SEVERITAS: An externally validated mortality prediction for critically ill patients in low and middle-income countries.SEVERITAS:一种针对中低收入国家危重症患者的外部验证死亡率预测模型。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Nov;131:103959. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.103959. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
10
Early hospital mortality prediction of intensive care unit patients using an ensemble learning approach.基于集成学习方法的重症监护病房患者早期住院病死率预测。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Dec;108:185-195. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of restrictive fluid therapy on the time to resolution of hyperlactatemia in ICU patients with septic shock. A secondary post hoc analysis of the CLASSIC randomized trial.限制液体疗法对 ICU 脓毒性休克患者乳酸清除时间的影响。CLASSIC 随机试验的事后二次分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 May;50(5):678-686. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07385-9. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
2
Replacing protein via enteral nutrition in a stepwise approach in critically ill patients: the REPLENISH randomized clinical trial protocol.采用逐步递进式肠内营养方案来补充蛋白质治疗危重症患者:REPLENISH 随机临床试验方案。
Trials. 2023 Jul 30;24(1):485. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07507-6.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Predictive Performance of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II and the Initial Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score in Acutely Ill Intensive Care Patients: Post-Hoc Analyses of the SUP-ICU Inception Cohort Study.简化急性生理学评分(SAPS)II和初始序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分对急重症监护患者的预测性能:SUP-ICU初始队列研究的事后分析
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 22;11(12):e0168948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168948. eCollection 2016.
2
Restricting volumes of resuscitation fluid in adults with septic shock after initial management: the CLASSIC randomised, parallel-group, multicentre feasibility trial.限制初始治疗后脓毒性休克成人复苏液量:CLASSIC 随机、平行组、多中心可行性试验。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Nov;42(11):1695-1705. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4500-7. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
3
Is research from databases reliable? No.
来自数据库的研究可靠吗?不可靠。
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Jan;45(1):115-117. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5073-4. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
Construction and internal validation of a new mortality risk score for patients admitted to the intensive care unit.重症监护病房收治患者新型死亡风险评分的构建与内部验证
Int J Clin Pract. 2016 Nov;70(11):916-922. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12851. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
4
Stress ulcer prophylaxis with a proton pump inhibitor versus placebo in critically ill patients (SUP-ICU trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.危重症患者使用质子泵抑制剂与安慰剂进行应激性溃疡预防(SUP-ICU试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Apr 19;17(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1331-3.
5
A calibration hierarchy for risk models was defined: from utopia to empirical data.定义了风险模型的校准层次结构:从理想状态到经验数据。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;74:167-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.12.005. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
6
In-hospital vs. 30-day mortality in the critically ill - a 2-year Swedish intensive care cohort analysis.危重症患者的院内死亡率与30天死亡率——一项为期2年的瑞典重症监护队列分析
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Aug;59(7):846-58. doi: 10.1111/aas.12554. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
7
Prevalence and outcome of gastrointestinal bleeding and use of acid suppressants in acutely ill adult intensive care patients.急性危重病成年重症监护患者的胃肠道出血发生率和结局以及抑酸剂的使用情况。
Intensive Care Med. 2015 May;41(5):833-45. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3725-1. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
8
Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement.透明报告个体预后或诊断的多变量预测模型(TRIPOD):TRIPOD 声明。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 7;350:g7594. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7594.
9
Lower versus higher hemoglobin threshold for transfusion in septic shock.较低与较高血红蛋白阈值用于感染性休克患者输血。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 9;371(15):1381-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406617. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
10
Standards for definitions and use of outcome measures for clinical effectiveness research in perioperative medicine: European Perioperative Clinical Outcome (EPCO) definitions: a statement from the ESA-ESICM joint taskforce on perioperative outcome measures.围手术期医学临床有效性研究结局指标的定义和使用标准:欧洲围手术期临床结局(EPCO)定义:欧洲麻醉学会-欧洲重症监护医学学会围手术期结局指标联合工作组声明
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Feb;32(2):88-105. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000118.