• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)强制要求的医疗器械批准后研究的成本负担。

Assessing the cost burden of United States FDA-mandated post-approval studies for medical devices.

作者信息

Wimmer Neil J, Robbins Susan, Ssemaganda Henry, Yang Erin, Normand Sharon-Lise, Matheny Michael E, Herz Naomi, Rising Josh, Resnic Frederic S

机构信息

Christiana Care, Division of Cardiology, Newark, DE, USA.

Comparative Effectiveness Research Institute and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Lahey Clinic Foundation, Burlington, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Health Care Finance. 2016 Summer;2016(Spec Features).

PMID:28280294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5340422/
Abstract

Approved medical devices frequently undergo FDA mandated post-approval studies (PAS). However, there is uncertainty as to the value of PAS in assessing the safety of medical devices and the cost of these studies to the healthcare system is unknown. Since PAS costs are funded through device manufacturers who do not share the costs with regulators, we sought to estimate the total PAS costs through interviews with a panel of experts in medical device clinical trial design in order to design a general cost model for PAS which was then applied to the FDA PAS. A total of 277 PAS were initiated between 3/1/05 through 6/30/13 and demonstrated a median cost of $2.16 million per study and an overall cost of $1.22 billion over the 8.25 years of study. While these costs are funded through manufacturers, the ultimate cost is borne by the healthcare system through the medical device costs. Given concerns regarding the informational value of PAS, the resources used to support mandated PAS may be better allocated to other approaches to assure safety.

摘要

获批的医疗设备经常要接受美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)规定的批准后研究(PAS)。然而,PAS在评估医疗设备安全性方面的价值存在不确定性,而且这些研究对医疗保健系统的成本尚不清楚。由于PAS的费用由设备制造商承担,而制造商并不与监管机构分担成本,我们试图通过采访一组医疗设备临床试验设计专家来估算PAS的总成本,以便设计一个PAS的通用成本模型,然后将其应用于FDA的PAS。在2005年3月1日至2013年6月30日期间,共启动了277项PAS,每项研究的中位数成本为216万美元,在8.25年的研究期间总成本为12.2亿美元。虽然这些成本由制造商承担,但最终成本由医疗保健系统通过医疗设备成本来承担。鉴于对PAS信息价值的担忧,用于支持规定的PAS的资源可能更好地分配到其他确保安全的方法上。

相似文献

1
Assessing the cost burden of United States FDA-mandated post-approval studies for medical devices.评估美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)强制要求的医疗器械批准后研究的成本负担。
J Health Care Finance. 2016 Summer;2016(Spec Features).
2
Characteristics of Clinical Studies Conducted Over the Total Product Life Cycle of High-Risk Therapeutic Medical Devices Receiving FDA Premarket Approval in 2010 and 2011.2010 年和 2011 年 FDA 上市前批准的高风险治疗性医疗器械全产品生命周期临床试验特点。
JAMA. 2015 Aug 11;314(6):604-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.8761.
3
Assessing the safety and effectiveness of devices after US Food and Drug Administration approval: FDA-mandated postapproval studies.评估美国食品和药物管理局批准后设备的安全性和有效性:FDA 强制要求的上市后研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Nov;174(11):1773-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.4194.
4
How do Orthopaedic Devices Change After Their Initial FDA Premarket Approval?骨科器械在首次获得美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)上市前批准后会发生怎样的变化?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Apr;474(4):1053-68. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4634-x. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
5
Enrollment and monitoring of women in post-approval studies for medical devices mandated by the Food and Drug Administration.医疗器械上市后研究中的女性入组和监测:食品和药物管理局的强制要求。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 Mar;23(3):218-23. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4343. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
6
Incremental Revisions across the Life Span of Ophthalmic Devices after Initial Food and Drug Administration Premarket Approval, 1979-2015.1979 年至 2015 年初始食品和药物管理局上市前批准后眼科设备寿命期间的增量修订。
Ophthalmology. 2017 Aug;124(8):1237-1246. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.03.040. Epub 2017 May 10.
7
Marketing approval for the lithotripter.碎石机的上市许可。
Isr J Med Sci. 1986 Jul-Aug;22(7-8):519-23.
8
The nightmare of FDA clearance/approval to market: perception or reality?美国食品药品监督管理局批准上市的噩梦:是认知还是现实?
Technol Health Care. 1996 Sep;4(3):259-67.
9
Clinical Evidence Supporting US Food and Drug Administration Premarket Approval of High-Risk Otolaryngologic Devices, 2000-2014.2000 - 2014年支持美国食品药品监督管理局对高风险耳鼻喉科设备进行上市前批准的临床证据
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Feb;156(2):285-288. doi: 10.1177/0194599816684094. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
10
Mechanical devices and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval.机械设备与美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的批准。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu. 2006:123-7. doi: 10.1053/j.pcsu.2006.02.018.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-world data to support post-market safety and performance of embolization coils: evidence generation from a medical device manufacturer and data institute partnership.支持栓塞线圈上市后安全性和性能的真实世界数据:医疗器械制造商和数据研究所合作产生的证据。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02659-0.
2
Determining the value of the abdominal core health quality collaborative to support regulatory decisions.确定腹部核心健康质量合作组织的价值,以支持监管决策。
Hernia. 2024 Aug;28(4):1137-1144. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-02990-5. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
3
Flux-Type versus Concentration-Type Sensors in Transdermal Measurements.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the safety and effectiveness of devices after US Food and Drug Administration approval: FDA-mandated postapproval studies.评估美国食品和药物管理局批准后设备的安全性和有效性:FDA 强制要求的上市后研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Nov;174(11):1773-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.4194.
2
Postmarket surveillance for medical devices: America's new strategy.医疗器械上市后监测:美国的新策略。
BMJ. 2012 Oct 11;345:e6848. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e6848.
3
Postmarketing surveillance of medical devices--filling in the gaps.医疗器械上市后监测——填补空白
通量型传感器与浓度型传感器在经皮测量中的应用比较。
Biosensors (Basel). 2023 Aug 25;13(9):845. doi: 10.3390/bios13090845.
4
Characteristics of pivotal clinical trials of FDA-approved endovascular devices between 2000 and 2018: An interrupted time series analysis.2000年至2018年间美国食品药品监督管理局批准的血管内装置关键临床试验的特征:一项中断时间序列分析。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Feb 3;7(1):e67. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.10. eCollection 2023.
5
Estimated Cost of Developing a Therapeutic Complex Medical Device in the US.在美国开发治疗性综合医疗器械的估计成本。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2231609. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.31609.
6
Use of data from the Vascular Quality Initiative registry to support regulatory decisions yielded a high return on investment.利用血管质量倡议登记处的数据来支持监管决策产生了高投资回报率。
BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2020 Oct 30;2(1):e000039. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2020-000039. eCollection 2020.
7
Authors' response.作者回复。
BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2020 Oct 30;2(1):e000067. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2020-000067. eCollection 2020.
8
Postmarket surveillance of high-risk medical devices needs transparent, comprehensive and independent registries.高风险医疗器械的上市后监测需要透明、全面且独立的注册系统。
BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2020 Oct 30;2(1):e000065. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2020-000065. eCollection 2020.
9
Determining value of Coordinated Registry Networks (CRNs): a case of transcatheter valve therapies.确定协调注册网络(CRNs)的价值:以经导管瓣膜治疗为例。
BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2019 Jul 4;1(1):e000003. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2019-000003. eCollection 2019.
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 8;366(10):875-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1114865. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
4
Left to their own devices: breakdowns in United States medical device premarket review.放任自流:美国医疗器械上市前审查的崩溃。
PLoS Med. 2010 Jul 13;7(7):e1000280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000280.
5
American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association methodology for the selection and creation of performance measures for quantifying the quality of cardiovascular care.美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会用于选择和制定量化心血管护理质量的绩效指标的方法。
Circulation. 2005 Apr 5;111(13):1703-12. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000157096.95223.D7.
6
Medical device development: from prototype to regulatory approval.医疗设备开发:从原型到监管批准。
Circulation. 2004 Jun 29;109(25):3068-72. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000134695.65733.64.