Kantovitz Kamila Rosamilia, Moreira Kelly Maria Silva, Pascon Fernanda Miori, Nociti Francisco Humberto, Machado Tabchoury Cinthia P, Puppin-Rontani Regina Maria
Department Pediatric Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pediatr Dent. 2016 Nov 15;38(7):472-476.
To evaluate the penetration ratio of filled and unfilled resin-based sealants on different enamel substrates and pit and fissure morphologies.
Forty-eight occlusal enamel blocks obtained from impacted human third molars were randomly divided (n equals eight) according to enamel substrates (sound; caries-like lesion; caries-like lesion plus topical fluoride application) and sealant material (FluroShield; Helioseal Clear Chroma). Sealants were applied on the enamel surface. The specimens were stored in 100 percent humidity for 24 hours at 37 degrees Celsius, sectioned in a buccal-lingual direction (at approximately 50 μm), and examined to determine the sealant penetration ratio (b x 100/a; a equals total fissure length and b equals sealant penetration length) and pit and fissure morphology (V-, U-, or Y-shaped). Statistical analysis was performed using Friedman and Kruskal-Wallis tests (P<0.05).
Enamel substrate and sealant material did not affect the sealant penetration ratio, with no interactions between these factors. Moreover, the morphology significantly affected the sealant penetration, with the "Y"-shaped fissures presenting the lowest sealant penetration ratio compared to "U-"shaped (P=0.0001) and "V-" shaped fissures (P=0.0018).
Pit and fissure morphology was a critical factor on sealant's penetration capacity; however, enamel substrate and sealant type did not affect sealant's penetration ratio.
评估填充和未填充的树脂基封闭剂在不同釉质基质及窝沟形态上的渗透比率。
从拔除的人类第三恒磨牙获取48个咬合面釉质块,根据釉质基质(健康;类龋损;类龋损加局部应用氟化物)和封闭剂材料(氟护盾;赫利欧封闭剂透明色度)随机分成8组。将封闭剂应用于釉质表面。标本在37摄氏度、湿度100%的条件下储存24小时,沿颊舌方向切片(约50μm),检查以确定封闭剂渗透比率(b×100/a;a等于窝沟总长度,b等于封闭剂渗透长度)及窝沟形态(V形、U形或Y形)。采用弗里德曼检验和克鲁斯卡尔 - 沃利斯检验进行统计分析(P<0.05)。
釉质基质和封闭剂材料不影响封闭剂渗透比率,这些因素之间无相互作用。此外,形态显著影响封闭剂渗透,与U形(P = 0.0001)和V形(P = 0.0018)窝沟相比,Y形窝沟的封闭剂渗透比率最低。
窝沟形态是影响封闭剂渗透能力的关键因素;然而,釉质基质和封闭剂类型不影响封闭剂的渗透比率。