Hatirli Hüseyin, Yasa Bilal, Yasa Elif
Izmir Katip Celebi University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry.
Private practitioner.
Dent Mater J. 2018 Jan 30;37(1):15-23. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2016-234. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
The aim of the study was to evaluate microleakage and the penetration-depths of different fissure-sealant materials applied with/without enameloplasty after cyclic aging. One-hundred-sixty mandibular molars were divided into non-invasive and enameloplasty preparation groups and eight material subgroups, including: flowable composites (microhyrid, nanohybrid, and nanofilled), three resin-based (unfilled, filled, and highly-filled), a giomer-based, and a glass-ionomer-based fissure sealant. Specimens were subjected to two-year cyclic chewing and brushing simulation. After 5% basic-fuchsin dye penetration, specimens were sectioned and scored under stereomicroscope. Kruskal-Wallis statistical data showed that preparation type significantly affected the penetration of all tested materials (p<0.05), but not significantly affected microleakage (p>0.05). Flowable composites showed the best and the glass-ionomer-based sealant showed the worst penetration and microleakage. Slight preparation of fissures is not important in microleakage. However, enameloplasty significantly enhanced the depth of penetration of the sealants. Flowable composites offer promising results at the fissure sealing.
本研究的目的是评估在循环老化后,使用或不使用釉质成形术应用不同窝沟封闭材料时的微渗漏情况和渗透深度。160颗下颌磨牙被分为非侵入性组和釉质成形术预备组以及八个材料亚组,包括:可流动复合树脂(微混合、纳米混合和纳米填充)、三种树脂基(无填料、有填料和高填料)、一种玻璃离子omer基和一种基于giomer的窝沟封闭剂。对样本进行为期两年的循环咀嚼和刷牙模拟。在5%碱性品红染料渗透后,将样本切片并在立体显微镜下评分。Kruskal-Wallis统计数据表明,预备类型显著影响所有测试材料的渗透情况(p<0.05),但对微渗漏没有显著影响(p>0.05)。可流动复合树脂显示出最佳效果,而玻璃离子omer基封闭剂的渗透和微渗漏情况最差。轻微的窝沟预备对微渗漏并不重要。然而,釉质成形术显著提高了封闭剂的渗透深度。可流动复合树脂在窝沟封闭方面提供了有前景的结果。