• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

填充型和非填充型树脂类窝沟封闭剂成功率的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析

Comparison of the Success Rate of Filled and Unfilled Resin-Based Fissure Sealants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Bagheri Elmira, Sarraf Shirazi Alireza, Shekofteh Kiana

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Department of Dental Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Front Dent. 2022 Feb 8;19:10. doi: 10.18502/fid.v19i10.8855. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.18502/fid.v19i10.8855
PMID:35937149
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9294718/
Abstract

Incorporation of fillers might improve the physical properties of sealants. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the retention and caries development rate of filled and unfilled fissure sealants. This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and ISI Web of Knowledge were searched until October 24, 2019. The risk of bias (ROB) was assessed for the included studies based on the Cochrane collaboration common scheme for bias, and the meta-analysis was performed through a random effects model. The search resulted in 6,336 unrepeated relevant studies. After the title, abstract and full-text screening, 19 studies with 26 comparing groups were finally included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. According to the included studies, both retention rate and caries development in filled and unfilled resin-based sealants did not significantly differ within 2 years of follow-up. Since there was no significant difference in the retention rate and caries development between filled and unfilled sealants, it seems that the final decision should be made uniquely for each patient according to the type of fissure, patient's age, habits, etc.

摘要

添加填料可能会改善封闭剂的物理性能。本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了含填料和不含填料的窝沟封闭剂的保留率和龋齿发生率。本研究按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南进行。检索了截至2019年10月24日的PubMed、Scopus、Embase、Cochrane系统评价数据库和ISI科学网。根据Cochrane协作组的偏倚通用方案对纳入研究的偏倚风险进行评估,并通过随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。检索结果为6336项不重复的相关研究。经过标题、摘要和全文筛选,最终有19项研究、26个比较组纳入本系统评价和荟萃分析。根据纳入研究,含填料和不含填料的树脂基封闭剂在随访2年内的保留率和龋齿发生率均无显著差异。由于含填料和不含填料的封闭剂在保留率和龋齿发生率方面无显著差异,因此似乎应根据窝沟类型、患者年龄、习惯等因素为每个患者做出唯一的最终决定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb7/9294718/53c966161c8e/FID-19-10-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb7/9294718/79a0dc846139/FID-19-10-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb7/9294718/d7ebc5e2b41b/FID-19-10-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb7/9294718/2bfd749306bd/FID-19-10-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb7/9294718/8cf3f62d8575/FID-19-10-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb7/9294718/53c966161c8e/FID-19-10-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb7/9294718/79a0dc846139/FID-19-10-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb7/9294718/d7ebc5e2b41b/FID-19-10-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb7/9294718/2bfd749306bd/FID-19-10-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb7/9294718/8cf3f62d8575/FID-19-10-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb7/9294718/53c966161c8e/FID-19-10-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Success Rate of Filled and Unfilled Resin-Based Fissure Sealants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.填充型和非填充型树脂类窝沟封闭剂成功率的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Front Dent. 2022 Feb 8;19:10. doi: 10.18502/fid.v19i10.8855. eCollection 2022.
2
Retention of flowable composite resins in comparison to pit and fissure sealants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.可流动复合树脂与窝沟封闭剂的保留情况:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gen Dent. 2020 Jul-Aug;68(4):50-55.
3
Retention of resin-based filled and unfilled pit and fissure sealants: A comparative clinical study.树脂基填充和未填充窝沟封闭剂的保留情况:一项对比临床研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2015 Mar;6(Suppl 1):S18-23. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.152932.
4
Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in permanent teeth.用于预防恒牙龋齿的窝沟封闭剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 31;7(7):CD001830. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001830.pub5.
5
Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents.用于预防儿童和青少年恒牙龋齿的窝沟封闭剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(3):CD001830. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001830.pub2.
6
Sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth.用于预防恒牙龋齿的窝沟封闭剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28(3):CD001830. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001830.pub4.
7
Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in children and adolescents.窝沟封闭剂与氟化物漆预防儿童和青少年龋齿的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD003067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003067.pub2.
8
Do nanofillers provide better physicomechanical properties to resin-based pit and fissure sealants? A systematic review.纳米填料是否能为树脂型窝沟封闭剂提供更好的物理机械性能?系统评价。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023 Sep;145:106037. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106037. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
9
Flowable composite as fissure sealing material? A systematic review and meta-analysis.可流动复合树脂作为窝沟封闭材料?一项系统评价与Meta分析。
Br Dent J. 2018 Jan 26;224(2):92-97. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.40.
10
Caries-Preventive Effect of High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer and Resin-Based Fissure Sealants on Permanent Teeth: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.高粘度玻璃离子体和树脂基窝沟封闭剂对恒牙的防龋效果:临床试验的系统评价
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 22;11(1):e0146512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146512. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the clinical performance of self-adhering flowable composite and resin-based pit and fissure sealant: a randomized clinical trial in pediatric patients.自黏流动复合树脂与树脂型窝沟封闭剂临床性能比较:儿科患者的随机临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 14;24(1):943. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04449-6.
2
Clinical effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants in primary and permanent teeth of children and adolescents: an umbrella review.儿童和青少年乳牙和恒牙窝沟封闭剂的临床效果:伞式综述。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2024 Jun;25(3):289-315. doi: 10.1007/s40368-024-00876-9. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
3
Evaluation of the effectiveness of prophylactic sealing of pits and fissures of permanent teeth with fissure sealants - umbrella review.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Resin-based Sealants: A Clinical Study.疏水性和亲水性树脂基封闭剂的比较评估:一项临床研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Jul 1;20(7):812-817.
2
Effectiveness of Seven Types of Sealants: Retention after One Year.七种封闭剂的有效性:一年后的保留情况
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019 Mar-Apr;12(2):96-100. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1600.
3
The clinical effects of laser preparation of tooth surfaces for fissure sealants placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.激光预备窝沟封闭牙面的临床效果:系统评价和 Meta 分析。
窝沟封闭预防恒磨牙窝沟龋的效果评价——伞式综述。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Oct 27;23(1):806. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03499-6.
BMC Oral Health. 2019 Sep 2;19(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0892-4.
4
Retention and remineralization effect of moisture tolerant resin-based sealant and glass ionomer sealant on non-cavitated pit and fissure caries: Randomized controlled clinical trial.耐湿性树脂基密封剂和玻璃离子体密封剂对非窝沟龋的保留和再矿化效果:随机对照临床试验。
J Dent. 2019 Jul;86:69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.05.027. Epub 2019 May 25.
5
The Efficacy of Different Sealant Modalities for Prevention of Pits and Fissures Caries: A Randomized Clinical Trial.不同封闭剂预防窝沟龋的疗效:一项随机临床试验
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2019 Mar-Apr;9(2):119-128. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_80_18. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
6
Comparative Evaluation of Retention, Cariostatic Effect and Discoloration of Conventional and Hydrophilic Sealants - A Single Blinded Randomized Split Mouth Clinical Trial.传统型与亲水性窝沟封闭剂的保留率、防龋效果及变色情况的比较评估——一项单盲随机半口临床试验
Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Sep;9(Suppl 2):S233-S239. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_132_18.
7
Calcium phosphates as ion-releasing fillers in restorative resin-based materials.钙磷酸盐作为释放离子的填充剂在修复树脂基材料中的应用。
Dent Mater. 2019 Jan;35(1):3-14. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.08.288. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
8
Pit and Fissure Sealants-A Comprehensive Review.窝沟封闭剂——综述
Dent J (Basel). 2018 Jun 12;6(2):18. doi: 10.3390/dj6020018.
9
Comparative Evaluation of Penetration Ability of Three Pit and Fissure Sealants and Their Relationship with Fissure Patterns.三种窝沟封闭剂渗透能力的比较评估及其与窝沟形态的关系
J Dent (Shiraz). 2018 Jun;19(2):92-99.
10
The Use of Pit and Fissure Sealants-A Literature Review.窝沟封闭剂的应用——文献综述
Dent J (Basel). 2017 Dec 11;5(4):34. doi: 10.3390/dj5040034.