Lane-Fall Meghan B, Miano Todd A, Aysola Jaya, Augoustides John G T
1Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 2Center for Perioperative Outcomes Research and Transformation, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 3Center for Healthcare Improvement and Patient Safety, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 4Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 5Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Harold Amos Medical Faculty Development Program, Indianapolis, IN. 6NIH-NHLBI PRIDE Research in Implementation Science for Equity, San Francisco, CA. 7Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 8Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA. 9Office of Diversity and Inclusion, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Crit Care Med. 2017 May;45(5):822-827. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002322.
Diversity in the physician workforce is essential to providing culturally effective care. In critical care, despite the high stakes and frequency with which cultural concerns arise, it is unknown whether physician diversity reflects that of critically ill patients. We sought to characterize demographic trends in critical care fellows, who represent the emerging intensivist workforce.
We used published data to create logistic regression models comparing annual trends in the representation of women and racial/ethnic groups across critical care fellowship types.
United States Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education-approved residency and fellowship training programs.
Residents and fellows employed by Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education-accredited training programs from 2004 to 2014.
None.
From 2004 to 2014, the number of critical care fellows increased annually, up 54.1% from 1,606 in 2004-2005 to 2,475 in 2013-2014. The proportion of female critical care fellows increased from 29.5% (2004-2005) to 38.3% (2013-2014) (p < 0.001). The absolute number of black fellows increased each year but the percentage change was not statistically significantly different (5.1% in 2004-2005 vs 3.9% in 2013-2014; p = 0.92). Hispanic fellows increased in number from 124 (7.7%) in 2004-2005 to 216 (8.4%) in 2013-2014 (p = 0.015). The number of American Indian/Alaskan Native/Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander fellows decreased from 15 (1.0%) to seven (0.3%) (p < 0.001). When compared with population estimates, female critical care fellows and those from racial/ethnic minorities were underrepresented in all years.
The demographics of the emerging critical care physician workforce reflect underrepresentation of women and racial/ethnic minorities. Trends highlight increases in women and Hispanics and stable or decreasing representation of non-Hispanic underrepresented minority critical care fellows. Further research is needed to elucidate the reasons underlying persistent underrepresentation of racial and ethnic minorities in critical care fellowship programs.
医师队伍的多样性对于提供具有文化适应性的有效医疗至关重要。在重症监护领域,尽管文化问题出现的风险高且频繁,但尚不清楚医师的多样性是否反映了重症患者的多样性。我们试图描述重症监护专科住院医师(代表新兴的重症医学专业人员队伍)的人口统计学趋势。
我们使用已发表的数据创建逻辑回归模型,比较不同类型重症监护专科住院医师中女性和种族/族裔群体代表性的年度趋势。
美国研究生医学教育认证委员会认可的住院医师和专科住院医师培训项目。
2004年至2014年期间受美国研究生医学教育认证委员会认可的培训项目雇佣的住院医师和专科住院医师。
无。
2004年至2014年,重症监护专科住院医师数量逐年增加,从2004 - 2005年的1606人增加到2013 - 2014年的2475人,增幅为54.1%。女性重症监护专科住院医师的比例从29.5%(2004 - 2005年)增至38.3%(2013 - 2014年)(p < 0.001)。黑人专科住院医师的绝对数量逐年增加,但百分比变化无统计学显著差异(2004 - 2005年为5.1%,2013 - 2014年为3.9%;p = 0.92)。西班牙裔专科住院医师数量从2004 - 2005年的124人(7.7%)增至2013 - 2014年的216人(8.4%)(p = 0.015)。美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民/夏威夷原住民/太平洋岛民专科住院医师数量从15人(1.0%)降至7人(0.3%)(p < 0.001)。与人口估计数相比,女性重症监护专科住院医师以及来自种族/族裔少数群体的专科住院医师在各年份的比例均偏低。
新兴重症医学医师队伍的人口统计学特征反映出女性和种族/族裔少数群体的代表性不足。趋势显示女性和西班牙裔的人数增加,而非西班牙裔代表性不足的少数群体重症监护专科住院医师的人数稳定或减少。需要进一步研究以阐明种族和族裔少数群体在重症监护专科住院医师项目中代表性持续不足的原因。