Westreich Daniel
From the Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, UNC-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Epidemiology. 2017 Jul;28(4):525-528. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000648.
Interest in implementation science and recent calls for consequentialist epidemiology urge epidemiologists to produce work more immediately applicable to public health practice. A clear vocabulary for such approaches is lacking. Here, we present a potential taxonomy of causal effects, distinguishing between "exposure effects" more relevant to patients and individuals; and "population intervention effects" more relevant to public health policy. We discuss this range of effects using figures and a simple numerical example.
对实施科学的关注以及近期对结果主义流行病学的呼吁促使流行病学家开展更直接适用于公共卫生实践的工作。目前缺乏适用于此类方法的清晰词汇表。在此,我们提出一种因果效应的潜在分类法,区分与患者和个体更相关的“暴露效应”,以及与公共卫生政策更相关的“人群干预效应”。我们通过图表和一个简单的数值示例来讨论这一系列效应。