Hothersall J Daniel, Torella Rubben, Humphreys Sian, Hooley Monique, Brown Alastair, McMurray Gordon, Nickolls Sarah A
Pfizer, Neuroscience and Pain Research Unit UK, The Portway Building, Granta Park, Cambridge, CB21 6GS, United Kingdom; Heptares Therapeutics, BioPark, Broadwater Road, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, AL7 3AX, United Kingdom.
Pfizer, Neuroscience and Pain Research Unit UK, The Portway Building, Granta Park, Cambridge, CB21 6GS, United Kingdom.
Neuropharmacology. 2017 May 15;118:46-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
The development of G protein-biased agonists for the μ-opioid receptor (MOR) offers a clear drug discovery rationale for improved analgesia and reduced side-effects of opiate pharmacotherapy. However, our understanding of the molecular mechanisms governing ligand bias is limited, which hinders our ability to rationally design biased compounds. We have investigated the role of MOR binding site residues W320 and Y328 in controlling bias, by receptor mutagenesis. The pharmacology of a panel of ligands in a cAMP and a β-arrestin2 assay were compared between the wildtype and mutated receptors, with bias factors calculated by operational analysis using ΔΔlog(τ/K) values. [H]diprenorphine competition binding was used to estimate affinity changes. Introducing the mutations W320A and Y328F caused changes in pathway bias, with different patterns of change between ligands. For example, DAMGO increased relative β-arrestin2 activity at the W320A mutant, whilst its β-arrestin2 response was completely lost at Y328F. In contrast, endomorphin-1 gained activity with Y328F but lost activity at W320A, in both pathways. For endomorphin-2 there was a directional shift from cAMP bias at the wildtype towards more β-arrestin2 bias at W320A. We also observe clear uncoupling between mutation-driven changes in function and binding affinity. These findings suggest that the mutations influenced the balance of pathway activation in a ligand-specific manner, thus identifying residues in the MOR binding pocket that govern ligand bias. This increases our understanding of how ligand/receptor binding interactions can be translated into agonist-specific pathway activation.
开发针对μ-阿片受体(MOR)的G蛋白偏向性激动剂为改善阿片类药物疗法的镇痛效果和减少副作用提供了明确的药物发现原理。然而,我们对控制配体偏向性的分子机制的理解有限,这阻碍了我们合理设计偏向性化合物的能力。我们通过受体诱变研究了MOR结合位点残基W320和Y328在控制偏向性中的作用。在野生型和突变型受体之间比较了一组配体在cAMP和β-抑制蛋白2检测中的药理学,使用ΔΔlog(τ/K)值通过操作分析计算偏向因子。使用[H]二丙诺啡竞争结合来估计亲和力变化。引入W320A和Y328F突变导致途径偏向性发生变化,不同配体的变化模式不同。例如,DAMGO在W320A突变体处增加了相对β-抑制蛋白2活性,而在Y328F处其β-抑制蛋白2反应完全丧失。相比之下,内吗啡肽-1在Y328F处获得活性,但在W320A处两条途径均丧失活性。对于内吗啡肽-2,存在从野生型的cAMP偏向性向W320A处更多β-抑制蛋白2偏向性的定向转变。我们还观察到功能的突变驱动变化与结合亲和力之间存在明显的解偶联。这些发现表明,突变以配体特异性方式影响途径激活的平衡,从而确定了MOR结合口袋中控制配体偏向性的残基。这增加了我们对配体/受体结合相互作用如何转化为激动剂特异性途径激活的理解。