van de Vreede Else-Marie, van den Berg Floor, Jahangiri Parsa, Caliskan Kadir, Mattace-Raso Francesco
Department of Geriatric Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 20;12(1):29. doi: 10.3390/jcm12010029.
Background: Implantation of continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (LVAD’s) has been increasingly used in patients with advanced heart failure (HF). Little is known about the non-invasive hemodynamics and the relationship with adverse events in this specific group of patients. We aimed to identify any differences in non-invasive hemodynamics in patients with an LVAD in different age categories and to investigate if there is an association with major adverse events. Methods: In this observational cross-sectional study, HF patients with a continuous flow LVAD were included. Non-invasive hemodynamic parameters were measured with a validated, automated oscillometric blood pressure monitor. The occurrences of adverse events were registered by reviewing the medical records of the patients. An independent-samples T-test and Chi-square test were used to compare different groups of patients. Results: Forty-seven patients were included; of these, only 12 (25.6%) had a successful measurement. Heart rate, heart rate-adjusted augmentation index, and pulse wave velocity were higher in the ≥55 years of age LVAD group compared to the <55 years of age LVAD group (all p < 0.05). Stroke volume was significantly lower in the ≥55 years of age LVAD group compared to the <55 years of age LVAD group (p = 0.015). Patients with adverse events such as cardiovascular events, GI-bleeding, or admission to a hospital had lower central pulse pressure (cPP) than patients without any adverse event. Conclusion: Older LVAD patients have a significantly higher heart rate, heart rate-adjusted augmentation index, and pulse wave velocity and a significantly lower stroke volume compared to participants aged < 55 years. The pulsatile component of blood pressure was decreased in patients with adverse events.
连续流左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入术在晚期心力衰竭(HF)患者中的应用越来越广泛。对于这一特定患者群体的无创血流动力学及其与不良事件的关系知之甚少。我们旨在确定不同年龄组LVAD患者无创血流动力学的差异,并研究其与主要不良事件的相关性。方法:在这项观察性横断面研究中,纳入了植入连续流LVAD的HF患者。使用经过验证的自动示波血压监测仪测量无创血流动力学参数。通过查阅患者的病历记录不良事件的发生情况。采用独立样本T检验和卡方检验比较不同组别的患者。结果:共纳入47例患者;其中只有12例(25.6%)成功测量。≥55岁LVAD组的心率、心率校正增强指数和脉搏波速度高于<55岁LVAD组(均p<0.05)。≥55岁LVAD组的每搏输出量显著低于<55岁LVAD组(p=0.015)。发生心血管事件、胃肠道出血或住院等不良事件的患者的中心脉压(cPP)低于无任何不良事件的患者。结论:与<55岁的参与者相比,老年LVAD患者的心率、心率校正增强指数和脉搏波速度显著更高,每搏输出量显著更低。发生不良事件的患者血压的搏动成分降低。