Baneth Gad, Yasur-Landau Daniel, Gilad Matan, Nachum-Biala Yaarit
School of Veterinary Medicine, Hebrew University, P.O. Box 12, Rehovot, 76100, Israel.
Parasit Vectors. 2017 Mar 13;10(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2050-7.
Infection and clinical disease associated with Leishmania major and Leishmania tropica, two common agents of human cutaneous leishmaniosis, have rarely been reported in dogs. This study describes dogs infected with these Leishmania spp. prevalent in the Middle East and North Africa, and compares the serological response of dogs infected with Leishmania infantum, L. major or L. tropica to whole promastigote antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) of each species and to rK39 dipstick.
Leishmania major infection in a 5-month-old male dog was associated with alopecic and ulcerative periocular and limb skin lesions which responded to allopurinol treatment. Infection was detected by skin and blood polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and confirmed by DNA sequencing but the dog was seronegative. Leishmania tropica infection was detected in a 3-month-old female dog co-infected with Babesia vogeli and Anaplasma platys and with no skin lesions. PCR and DNA sequencing of the blood and parasite culture were positive for L. tropica. Sera from 11 dogs infected with L. infantum, L. major or L. tropica were reactive with all three Leishmania spp. antigens except for sera from a dog with L. major infection. No significant differences were found between reactivity of dog sera to the antigen of the infecting species, or to the other Leishmania spp. antigens. Sera from dogs infected with L. infantum and L. tropica were positive with the rK39 antigen kit, while dogs with L. major infection were seronegative.
Skin lesions in L. major infected dogs from this study and previous reports (n = 2) were ulcerative and located on the muzzle, feet and foot pads and not associated with generalized lymphadenomegaly and splenomegaly. In previous L. tropica infections, skin lesions were proliferative mucocutaneous in young dogs (n = 2), or associated with widespread dermatitis, lymphadenomegaly and splenomegaly in older dogs with similarity to L. infantum infection (n = 2). This study suggests that ELISA serology with whole promastigote antigen is not distinctive between L. infantum, L. major and L. tropica canine infections and that some L. major infections are not seropositive. PCR with DNA sequencing should be used to discriminate between canine infections with these three species.
人类皮肤利什曼病的两种常见病原体——硕大利什曼原虫和热带利什曼原虫感染及相关临床疾病在犬类中鲜有报道。本研究描述了感染中东和北非地区流行的这些利什曼原虫物种的犬类,并比较了感染婴儿利什曼原虫、硕大利什曼原虫或热带利什曼原虫的犬类对每种物种的全前鞭毛体抗原酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)以及rK39试纸条的血清学反应。
一只5月龄雄性犬感染硕大利什曼原虫,伴有脱毛性和溃疡性眼周及肢体皮肤病变,对别嘌呤醇治疗有反应。通过皮肤和血液聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测到感染,并经DNA测序确认,但该犬血清学检测为阴性。在一只同时感染伯氏巴贝斯虫和血小板无形体且无皮肤病变的3月龄雌性犬中检测到热带利什曼原虫感染。血液和寄生虫培养物的PCR及DNA测序显示热带利什曼原虫呈阳性。11只感染婴儿利什曼原虫、硕大利什曼原虫或热带利什曼原虫的犬的血清与所有三种利什曼原虫抗原均有反应,但一只感染硕大利什曼原虫的犬的血清除外。犬血清对感染物种抗原或其他利什曼原虫抗原的反应性之间未发现显著差异。感染婴儿利什曼原虫和热带利什曼原虫的犬的血清用rK39抗原检测试剂盒检测呈阳性,而感染硕大利什曼原虫的犬血清学检测为阴性。
本研究及先前报道(n = 2)中感染硕大利什曼原虫的犬的皮肤病变为溃疡性,位于口鼻部、足部和脚垫,与全身性淋巴结肿大和脾肿大无关。在先前的热带利什曼原虫感染中,幼犬(n = 2)的皮肤病变为增殖性黏膜皮肤病变,或与老年犬广泛的皮炎、淋巴结肿大和脾肿大有关,与婴儿利什曼原虫感染相似(n = 2)。本研究表明,全前鞭毛体抗原ELISA血清学在婴儿利什曼原虫、硕大利什曼原虫和热带利什曼原虫犬类感染之间并无特异性,且一些硕大利什曼原虫感染血清学检测不呈阳性。应使用DNA测序的PCR来区分这三种物种的犬类感染。