Lilienthal Hellmuth, Dieter Hermann H, Hölzer Jürgen, Wilhelm Michael
Department of Hygiene, Social and Environmental Medicine, Ruhr University of Bochum, Universitätsstr. 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany.
retired; formerly: Federal Environment Agency (Umweltbundesamt) of Germany, Department Toxicology of Drinking Water and Swimming Pool Water, Wörlitzer Platz 1, 06844 Dessau-Roßlau, Germany.
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2017 Jun;220(4):766-775. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
The detection of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in surface and drinking water from various countries raised the attention to the presence of these chemicals in environmental probes and led to several regulatory actions to limit exposure in human beings. There was particular concern about perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), due to their former wide-spread use. Recently, several institutions published revisions of former regulatory or recommended maximum concentrations in drinking water and food, which are markedly lower than the former values. The present short overview describes the current regulations for PFAS and compares them with the outcome of several experimental studies in laboratory animals at low-level exposure to PFOA and PFOS. In addition, regulations for short-chain PFAS are presented which, due to lack of toxicological information, are evaluated according to the concepts of Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) or the Health-related Indication Values (HRIV).
在各国地表水和饮用水中检测到全氟烷基物质(PFAS),这引发了人们对环境样本中这些化学物质存在情况的关注,并促使采取了多项监管行动来限制人类接触。由于全氟辛酸(PFOA)和全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)曾被广泛使用,人们对它们尤为关注。最近,几家机构发布了饮用水和食品中先前监管或推荐的最大浓度的修订版,这些修订值明显低于先前的值。本简短综述描述了PFAS的现行法规,并将其与在低水平接触PFOA和PFOS的实验动物中进行的几项实验研究结果进行了比较。此外,还介绍了短链PFAS的法规,由于缺乏毒理学信息,这些法规是根据毒理学关注阈值(TTC)或健康相关指示值(HRIV)的概念进行评估的。