Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO)-Sustainable Health, 2400 Mol, Belgium.
German Environment Agency (UBA), 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 21;15(10):2085. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102085.
The European Union's 7th Environmental Action Programme (EAP) aims to assess and minimize environmental health risks from the use of hazardous chemicals by 2020. From this angle, policy questions like whether an implemented policy to reduce chemical exposure has had an effect over time, whether the health of people in specific regions or subpopulations is at risk, or whether the body burden of chemical substances (the internal exposure) varies with, for example, time, country, sex, age, or socio-economic status, need to be answered. Indicators can help to synthesize complex scientific information into a few key descriptors with the purpose of providing an answer to a non-expert audience. Human biomonitoring (HBM) indicators at the European Union (EU) level are unfortunately lacking. Within the Horizon2020 European Human Biomonitoring project HBM4EU, an approach to develop European HBM indicators was worked out. To learn from and ensure interoperability with other European indicators, 15 experts from the HBM4EU project (German Umweltbundesamt (UBA), Flemish research institute VITO, University of Antwerp, European Environment Agency (EEA)), and the World Health Organization (WHO), European Core Health Indicator initiative (ECHI), Eurostat, Swiss ETH Zurich and the Czech environmental institute CENIA, and contributed to a workshop, held in June 2017 at the EEA in Copenhagen. First, selection criteria were defined to evaluate when and if results of internal chemical exposure measured by HBM, need to be translated into a European HBM-based indicator. Two main aspects are the HBM indicator's relevance for policy, society, health, and the quality of the biomarker data (availability, comparability, ease of interpretation). Secondly, an approach for the calculation of the indicators was designed. Two types of indicators were proposed: 'sum indicators of internal exposure' derived directly from HBM biomarker concentrations and 'indicators for health risk', comparing HBM concentrations to HBM health-based guidance values (HBM HBGVs). In the latter case, both the percentage of the studied population exceeding the HBM HBGVs (PE) and the extent of exceedance (EE), calculated as the population's exposure level divided by the HBM HBGV, can be calculated. These indicators were applied to two examples of hazardous chemicals: bisphenol A (BPA) and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), which both have high policy and societal relevance and for which high quality published data were available (DEMOCOPHES, Swedish monitoring campaign). European HBM indicators help to summarize internal exposure to chemical substances among the European population and communicate to what degree environmental policies are successful in keeping internal exposures sufficiently low. The main aim of HBM indicators is to allow follow-up of chemical safety in Europe.
欧盟第七个环境行动计划(EAP)旨在到 2020 年评估和尽量减少危险化学品使用对环境健康造成的风险。从这个角度来看,需要回答一些政策问题,例如实施的减少化学物质暴露的政策是否随着时间的推移产生了效果,特定地区或亚人群的健康是否存在风险,或者化学物质的体内负荷(内部暴露)是否随时间、国家、性别、年龄或社会经济地位等因素而变化。指标可以帮助将复杂的科学信息综合成几个关键描述符,以便为非专业受众提供答案。不幸的是,欧盟层面的人类生物监测(HBM)指标还不存在。在“地平线 2020 年欧洲人类生物监测”项目 HBM4EU 中,制定了开发欧盟 HBM 指标的方法。为了借鉴和确保与其他欧洲指标的互操作性,来自 HBM4EU 项目(德国联邦环境署(UBA)、佛兰芒研究机构 VITO、安特卫普大学、欧洲环境署(EEA))、世界卫生组织(WHO)、欧洲核心健康指标倡议(ECHI)、欧盟统计局(Eurostat)、瑞士苏黎世联邦理工学院(ETH Zurich)和捷克环境研究所(CENIA)的 15 名专家参与了 2017 年 6 月在哥本哈根 EEA 举行的研讨会。首先,定义了选择标准,以评估通过 HBM 测量的内部化学暴露的结果何时以及是否需要转化为基于欧盟的 HBM 指标。两个主要方面是 HBM 指标对政策、社会、健康的相关性,以及生物标志物数据的质量(可用性、可比性、易于解释)。其次,设计了一种用于计算指标的方法。提出了两种类型的指标:直接从 HBM 生物标志物浓度得出的“内部暴露综合指标”,以及“健康风险指标”,将 HBM 浓度与 HBM 健康基准值(HBM HBGVs)进行比较。在后一种情况下,可以计算超过 HBM HBGVs(PE)的研究人群百分比和超过程度(EE),计算方法为研究人群的暴露水平除以 HBM HBGV。这些指标应用于两种危险化学品的示例:双酚 A(BPA)和全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFASs),这两种物质都具有很高的政策和社会相关性,并且有高质量的已发表数据可用(DEMOCOPHES、瑞典监测活动)。欧盟 HBM 指标有助于总结欧洲人口对化学物质的体内暴露情况,并说明环境政策在将体内暴露保持在足够低的水平方面取得了多大的成功。HBM 指标的主要目的是允许对欧洲的化学物质安全进行后续监测。