Suppr超能文献

STEMS试点试验:一项试点整群随机对照试验,旨在研究在由全科医生主导的常规初级护理基础上,增加患者直接获得物理治疗服务,用于治疗患有肌肉骨骼疼痛的成年人。

STEMS pilot trial: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial to investigate the addition of patient direct access to physiotherapy to usual GP-led primary care for adults with musculoskeletal pain.

作者信息

Bishop Annette, Ogollah Reuben O, Jowett Sue, Kigozi Jesse, Tooth Stephanie, Protheroe Joanne, Hay Elaine M, Salisbury Chris, Foster Nadine E

机构信息

Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK.

Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 12;7(3):e012987. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012987.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Around 17% of general practitioner (GP) consultations are for musculoskeletal conditions, which will rise as the population ages. Patient direct access to physiotherapy provides one solution, yet adoption in the National Health Service (NHS) has been slow.

SETTING

A pilot, pragmatic, non-inferiority, cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) in general practice and physiotherapy services in the UK.

OBJECTIVES

Investigate feasibility of a main RCT.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients registered in participating practices and consulting with a musculoskeletal problem.

INTERVENTIONS

4 general practices (clusters) randomised to provide GP-led care as usual or the addition of a patient direct access to physiotherapy pathway.

OUTCOMES

Process outcomes and exploratory analyses of clinical and cost outcomes.

DATA COLLECTION

Participant-level data were collected via questionnaires at identification, 2, 6 and 12 months and through medical records.

BLINDING

The study statistician and research nurses were blinded to practice allocation.

RESULTS

Of 2696 patients invited to complete study questionnaires, 978 participated (intervention group n=425, control arm n=553) and were analysed. Participant recruitment was completed in 6 months. Follow-up rates were 78% (6 months) and 71% (12 months). No evidence of selection bias was observed. The direct access pathway was used by 90% of patients in intervention practices needing physiotherapy. Some increase in referrals to physiotherapy occurred from one practice, although waiting times for physiotherapy did not increase (28 days before, 26 days after introduction of direct access). No safety issues were identified. Clinical and cost outcomes were similar in both groups. Exploratory estimates of between group effect (using 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS)) at 6 months was -0.28 (95% CI -1.35 to 0.79) and at 12 months 0.12 (95% CI -1.27 to 1.51).

CONCLUSIONS

A full RCT is feasible and will provide trial evidence about the clinical and cost-effectiveness of patient direct access to physiotherapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN23378642.

摘要

引言

全科医生(GP)诊疗中约17%是关于肌肉骨骼疾病的,随着人口老龄化这一比例还会上升。患者直接获得物理治疗是一种解决办法,但在国民医疗服务体系(NHS)中的采用速度一直较慢。

背景

在英国全科医疗和物理治疗服务中进行的一项试点、务实、非劣效性、整群随机对照试验(RCT)。

目的

调查一项主要RCT的可行性。

参与者

在参与诊疗机构注册并因肌肉骨骼问题前来就诊的成年患者。

干预措施

4个全科诊疗机构(整群)随机分组,一组照常提供由全科医生主导的护理,另一组增加患者直接获得物理治疗的途径。

结果

过程性结果以及对临床和成本结果的探索性分析。

数据收集

通过在识别时、2个月、6个月和12个月时的问卷以及病历收集参与者层面的数据。

设盲

研究统计人员和研究护士对诊疗机构的分组情况不知情。

结果

在受邀填写研究问卷的2696名患者中,978名参与(干预组n = 425,对照组n = 553)并进行了分析。参与者招募在6个月内完成。随访率分别为78%(6个月)和71%(12个月)。未观察到选择偏倚的证据。干预诊疗机构中90%需要物理治疗的患者使用了直接获得物理治疗的途径。有一个诊疗机构转介到物理治疗的患者有所增加,不过物理治疗的等待时间没有增加(引入直接获得物理治疗途径前为28天,引入后为26天)。未发现安全问题。两组的临床和成本结果相似。6个月时组间效应(使用36项简短健康调查问卷(SF - 36)身体成分总结(PCS))的探索性估计值为 - 0.28(95%可信区间 - 1.35至0.79),12个月时为0.12(95%可信区间 - 1.27至1.51)。

结论

一项全面的RCT是可行的,将为患者直接获得物理治疗的临床和成本效益提供试验证据。

试验注册号

ISRCTN23378642。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8211/5353299/4c477af151f3/bmjopen2016012987f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验