Suppr超能文献

分层初级保健与非分层保健治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛:来自 STarT MSK 可行性和试点集群随机对照试验的结果。

Stratified primary care versus non-stratified care for musculoskeletal pain: findings from the STarT MSK feasibility and pilot cluster randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.

Keele Clinical Trials Unit, School for Primary, Community and Social Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Keele University, Newcastle, UK.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Feb 11;21(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1074-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Musculoskeletal (MSK) pain from the five most common presentations to primary care (back, neck, shoulder, knee or multi-site pain), where the majority of patients are managed, is a costly global health challenge. At present, first-line decision-making is based on clinical reasoning and stratified models of care have only been tested in patients with low back pain. We therefore, examined the feasibility of; a) a future definitive cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT), and b) General Practitioners (GPs) providing stratified care at the point-of-consultation for these five most common MSK pain presentations.

METHODS

The design was a pragmatic pilot, two parallel-arm (stratified versus non-stratified care), cluster RCT and the setting was 8 UK GP practices (4 intervention, 4 control) with randomisation (stratified by practice size) and blinding of trial statistician and outcome data-collectors. Participants were adult consulters with MSK pain without indicators of serious pathologies, urgent medical needs, or vulnerabilities. Potential participant records were tagged and individuals sent postal invitations using a GP point-of-consultation electronic medical record (EMR) template. The intervention was supported by the EMR template housing the Keele STarT MSK Tool (to stratify into low, medium and high-risk prognostic subgroups of persistent pain and disability) and recommended matched treatment options. Feasibility outcomes included exploration of recruitment and follow-up rates, selection bias, and GP intervention fidelity. To capture recommended outcomes including pain and function, participants completed an initial questionnaire, brief monthly questionnaire (postal or SMS), and 6-month follow-up questionnaire. An anonymised EMR audit described GP decision-making.

RESULTS

GPs screened 3063 patients (intervention = 1591, control = 1472), completed the EMR template with 1237 eligible patients (intervention = 513, control = 724) and 524 participants (42%) consented to data collection (intervention = 231, control = 293). Recruitment took 28 weeks (target 12 weeks) with > 90% follow-up retention (target > 75%). We detected no selection bias of concern and no harms identified. GP stratification tool fidelity failed to achieve a-priori success criteria, whilst fidelity to the matched treatments achieved "complete success".

CONCLUSIONS

A future definitive cluster RCT of stratified care for MSK pain is feasible and is underway, following key amendments including a clinician-completed version of the stratification tool and refinements to recommended matched treatments.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Name of the registry: ISRCTN.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

  1. Date of registration: 06/04/2016.
摘要

背景

在初级保健中,最常见的五种表现(背部、颈部、肩部、膝盖或多部位疼痛)的肌肉骨骼(MSK)疼痛,大多数患者都是通过这种方式进行管理的,这是一个代价高昂的全球健康挑战。目前,一线决策是基于临床推理,而分层护理模式仅在腰痛患者中进行了测试。因此,我们检查了以下两点的可行性:a)未来的确定性集群随机对照试验(RCT),以及 b)全科医生(GP)在这五种最常见的 MSK 疼痛表现的就诊时提供分层护理。

方法

设计为实用的试点、两平行臂(分层与非分层护理)、集群 RCT,以及 8 个英国 GP 实践(4 个干预,4 个对照)的随机化(按实践规模分层)和试验统计学家和结果数据收集者的盲法。参与者是有 MSK 疼痛但没有严重病理、紧急医疗需求或脆弱性迹象的成年就诊者。潜在的参与者记录被标记,个人通过 GP 就诊时的电子病历(EMR)模板发送邮寄邀请。干预措施得到了 Keele STarT MSK 工具的 EMR 模板的支持(将分层为持续疼痛和残疾的低、中、高风险预后亚组)和推荐的匹配治疗方案。可行性结果包括探索招募和随访率、选择偏倚和 GP 干预的一致性。为了捕捉包括疼痛和功能在内的推荐结果,参与者完成了一份初始问卷、每月简短问卷(邮寄或短信)和 6 个月随访问卷。匿名的 EMR 审计描述了 GP 的决策。

结果

GP 筛选了 3063 名患者(干预组 1591 名,对照组 1472 名),完成了 EMR 模板,有 1237 名符合条件的患者(干预组 513 名,对照组 724 名)和 524 名参与者(42%)同意进行数据收集(干预组 231 名,对照组 293 名)。招募工作耗时 28 周(目标 12 周),随访保留率超过 90%(目标>75%)。我们没有发现令人担忧的选择偏倚,也没有发现任何危害。GP 分层工具的一致性未能达到事先设定的成功标准,而匹配治疗的一致性则达到了“完全成功”。

结论

经过包括临床医生完成的分层工具版本和对推荐的匹配治疗方案的改进等关键修订,为 MSK 疼痛进行分层护理的未来确定性集群 RCT 是可行的,目前正在进行中。

试验注册

注册名称:ISRCTN。

试验注册编号

15366334。注册日期:2016 年 4 月 6 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c3a/7014664/5561f70e0f66/12875_2019_1074_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验