• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理清导师共识和建议贴近度的影响。

Disentangling the effects of advisor consensus and advice proximity.

作者信息

Wanzel Stella K, Schultze Thomas, Schulz-Hardt Stefan

机构信息

Department of Economic and Social Psychology, Georg-August University Göttingen.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Oct;43(10):1669-1675. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000396. Epub 2017 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1037/xlm0000396
PMID:28287767
Abstract

When advice comes from interdependent sources (e.g., from advisors who use the same database), less information should be gained as compared to independent advice. On the other hand, since individuals strive for consistency, they should be more confident in consistent compared to conflicting advice, and interdependent advice should be more consistent than independent advice. In a study investigating the differential effects of interdependent versus independent advice on a judge's accuracy and confidence (Yaniv, Choshen-Hillel, & Milyavsky, 2009), advice interdependence was confounded with another variable, namely closeness of the advice to the judge's estimate. Interdependent advice was not only more consistent than independent advice but also closer to the judge's first estimate. The present study aimed at disentangling the effects of consensus and closeness of the advice by adding a third experimental condition in which interdependent (and, hence, consistent) advice was far from the judge's own estimate. We found that, as suggested by Yaniv et al., accuracy gains were indeed a consequence of advisor interdependence. However, in contrast to Yaniv et al.'s conclusions, confidence in the correctness of one's estimates was mostly a function of the advice's proximity to the participants' initial estimations, thereby indicating a social validation effect. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

当建议来自相互依赖的来源时(例如,来自使用相同数据库的顾问),与独立建议相比,所获得的信息应该更少。另一方面,由于个体追求一致性,与相互冲突的建议相比,他们应该对一致的建议更有信心,并且相互依赖的建议应该比独立建议更一致。在一项调查相互依赖与独立建议对法官准确性和信心的不同影响的研究中(亚尼夫、乔申 - 希勒尔和米利亚夫斯基,2009年),建议的相互依赖性与另一个变量混淆在一起,即建议与法官估计的接近程度。相互依赖的建议不仅比独立建议更一致,而且更接近法官的首次估计。本研究旨在通过增加第三种实验条件来厘清建议的一致性和接近程度的影响,在该条件下,相互依赖(因此也是一致)的建议与法官自己的估计相差甚远。我们发现,正如亚尼夫等人所指出的,准确性的提高确实是顾问相互依赖的结果。然而,与亚尼夫等人的结论相反,对自己估计正确性的信心主要是建议与参与者初始估计接近程度的函数,从而表明了一种社会验证效应。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》

相似文献

1
Disentangling the effects of advisor consensus and advice proximity.理清导师共识和建议贴近度的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Oct;43(10):1669-1675. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000396. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
2
Factors affecting the acceptance of expert advice.影响专家建议接受度的因素。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2005 Sep;44(Pt 3):443-61. doi: 10.1348/014466604X17092.
3
Neural activity tracking identity and confidence in social information.神经活动追踪社会信息中的身份和置信度。
Elife. 2023 Feb 10;12:e71315. doi: 10.7554/eLife.71315.
4
Spurious consensus and opinion revision: why might people be more confident in their less accurate judgments?虚假共识与观点修正:为什么人们对不太准确的判断反而更有信心?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Mar;35(2):558-63. doi: 10.1037/a0014589.
5
Do judges prefer advisors with dependent or independent errors? Investigating judges' advice selection and advice weighting.法官更喜欢有依赖误差还是独立误差的顾问?调查法官的建议选择和建议权重。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Jul;151(7):1636-1654. doi: 10.1037/xge0001153. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
6
Beyond the black letter of the law: an empirical study of an individual judge's decision process for civil commitment hearings.超越法律条文:对一名法官在民事强制住院听证会上决策过程的实证研究
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1997;25(1):79-94.
7
Young children heed advice selectively.幼儿有选择地听从建议。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Oct;138:71-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 May 30.
8
The role of decision confidence in advice-taking and trust formation.决策信心在采纳建议和建立信任方面的作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Mar;150(3):507-526. doi: 10.1037/xge0000960. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
9
Sleep Deprivation and Advice Taking.睡眠剥夺与接受建议
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 25;6:24386. doi: 10.1038/srep24386.
10
[The effects of judge's roles on probability judgment].[法官角色对概率判断的影响]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1997 Jun;68(2):79-87. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.68.79.

引用本文的文献

1
A meta-analysis of the weight of advice in decision-making.决策中建议权重的荟萃分析。
Curr Psychol. 2023 Oct;42(28):24516-24541. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03573-2. Epub 2022 Aug 9.