a Department of Psychiatry , University of Arizona.
b Department of Psychology , Yale University School of Medicine.
J Pers Assess. 2019 Mar-Apr;101(2):150-158. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1411917. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
The Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale (LEAS) has received considerable support as a reliable and valid measure of individual differences in emotional awareness (EA) since the original report involving 40 participants (Lane, Quinlan, Schwartz, Walker, & Zeitlin, 1990 ). However, the hypothesized developmental nature of EA (conceptualized as a cognitive skill) has thus far only been examined in that 1 early study. Here we report multiple regression analyses on the entire sample of 94 participants who completed the LEAS as part of that original study, as well as the same developmental and affective measures used in the original report. We first observed that different developmental measures, including the Object Relations Inventory and the Sentence Completion Test of Ego Development, accounted for unique portions of the variance in LEAS scores. We also observed that higher LEAS scores were associated with greater within-category variance in the self-reported positive and guilt- and shame-related emotions people reported experiencing on a typical day. Based on these findings, we introduce a 3-dimensional cognitive-developmental framework that LEAS scores plausibly track, including (a) the transition from focusing on external/physical to internal/psychological characteristics, (b) greater conceptual complexity, and (c) self-other differentiation. We then discuss the implications of this framework for understanding the nature of EA and for future research.
情绪意识水平量表(LEAS)自最初涉及 40 名参与者的报告(Lane、Quinlan、Schwartz、Walker 和 Zeitlin,1990)以来,作为衡量个体情绪意识(EA)差异的可靠且有效的工具,已经得到了广泛的支持。然而,EA 的假设发展性质(被概念化为一种认知技能)迄今为止仅在该早期研究中进行了检验。在这里,我们对作为原始研究一部分完成 LEAS 的 94 名参与者的整个样本进行了多元回归分析,以及与原始报告中使用的相同的发展和情感测量。我们首先观察到,不同的发展测量方法,包括客体关系量表和自我发展的句子完成测验,解释了 LEAS 分数变异的独特部分。我们还观察到,较高的 LEAS 分数与个体报告在典型一天中体验到的积极情绪以及与内疚和羞耻相关的情绪的自我报告内类别方差的增加有关。基于这些发现,我们引入了一个 3 维认知发展框架,LEAS 分数可能会追踪到该框架,包括(a)从关注外部/物理特征到内部/心理特征的转变,(b)更高的概念复杂性,以及(c)自我-他人分化。然后,我们讨论了该框架对于理解 EA 的本质以及未来研究的意义。