Suppr超能文献

评估年龄相关性黄斑变性风险因素时的生存偏差:以吸烟暴露为例的教程

Survival Bias When Assessing Risk Factors for Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Tutorial with Application to the Exposure of Smoking.

作者信息

McGuinness Myra B, Karahalios Amalia, Kasza Jessica, Guymer Robyn H, Finger Robert P, Simpson Julie A

机构信息

a Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital , Melbourne , Australia.

b Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health , University of Melbourne , Melbourne , Australia.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2017 Aug;24(4):229-238. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2016.1276934. Epub 2017 Mar 13.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We illustrate the effect of survival bias when investigating risk factors for eye disease in elderly populations for whom death is a competing risk. Our investigation focuses on the relationship between smoking and late age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in an observational study impacted by censoring due to death.

METHODS

Statistical methodology to calculate the survivor average causal effect (SACE) as a sensitivity analysis is described, including example statistical computing code for Stata and R. To demonstrate this method, we examine the causal effect of smoking history at baseline (1990-1994) on the presence of late AMD at the third study wave (2003-2007) using data from the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study.

RESULTS

Of the 40,506 participants eligible for inclusion, 38,092 (94%) survived until the start of the third study wave, 20,752 (51%) were graded for AMD (60% female, aged 47-85 years, mean 65 ± 8.7 years). Late AMD was detected in 122 participants. Logistic regression showed strong evidence of an increased risk of late AMD for current smokers compared to non-smokers (adjusted naïve odds ratio 2.99, 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.74-5.13). Among participants expected to be alive at the start of follow-up regardless of their smoking status, the estimated SACE odds ratio comparing current smokers to non-smokers was at least 3.42 (95% CI 1.57-5.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival bias can attenuate associations between harmful exposures and diseases of aging. Estimation of the SACE using a sensitivity analysis approach should be considered when conducting epidemiological research within elderly populations.

摘要

目的

我们阐述了在以死亡为竞争风险的老年人群中研究眼病风险因素时生存偏倚的影响。我们的研究聚焦于一项因死亡删失而受影响的观察性研究中吸烟与晚期年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)之间的关系。

方法

描述了作为敏感性分析计算幸存者平均因果效应(SACE)的统计方法,包括用于Stata和R的示例统计计算代码。为证明此方法,我们使用墨尔本协作队列研究的数据,研究基线期(1990 - 1994年)吸烟史对第三次研究随访期(2003 - 2007年)晚期AMD存在情况的因果效应。

结果

在40506名符合纳入条件的参与者中,38092名(94%)存活至第三次研究随访期开始,20752名(51%)接受了AMD分级(60%为女性,年龄47 - 85岁,平均65±8.7岁)。122名参与者被检测出患有晚期AMD。逻辑回归显示,与不吸烟者相比,当前吸烟者患晚期AMD的风险增加有强有力的证据(调整后的朴素比值比为2.99,95%置信区间,CI,1.74 - 5.13)。在无论吸烟状况如何预计在随访开始时存活的参与者中,比较当前吸烟者与不吸烟者的估计SACE比值比至少为3.42(95% CI 1.57 - 5.15)。

结论

生存偏倚可减弱有害暴露与衰老相关疾病之间的关联。在老年人群中进行流行病学研究时,应考虑使用敏感性分析方法估计SACE。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验